National environmental action plans
The development of national environmental resource management
strategies must be a national affair. The main instrument for this process is
the National Environmental Action Plan (NEAP). NEAPs are currently being
prepared or implemented with World Bank support by most African countries. They
should contain strategies for addressing all of the issues of the nexus. The
NEAP concept is multisectoral in approach, and oriented to bottom-up
participatory planning and implementation. It provides a framework for
integrating environmental concerns with social and economic planning within a
country. The objective is to identity priority areas and actions, develop
institutional awareness and processes, and mobilize popular participation
through an intensive consultation process with NGOs and community
representatives. Donor collaboration can also be effectively mobilized in this
manner.
A successful national approach to environmental concerns
involves several important steps:
· Establishing policies and legislation for resource
conservation and environmental protection that are integrated into the
macroeconomic framework and, if possible, assessing the costs of degradation.
These were, for example, estimated to be between 5 and 15 percent of GNP in
Madagascar and more than 5 percent of GDP in Ghana.
· Setting up the institutional
framework, usually involving a ministerial or higher-level environmental policy
body, developing mechanisms for coordination between agencies, building concern
in these agencies, balancing private and public sector concerns, decentralizing
environmental management, and assuring continuous contact with local people .The
preparation of regional land use plants could be an important component The
basic framework needed to guide the implementation of land tenure reform, forest
policy reform, and other elements discussed above can also be included in NEAPs.
· Strengthening national
capacity to carry out environmental assessments and establishing environmental
information systems. This can be done to some extent by restructuring wasting
data and making them available to users. Pilot demand-driven information systems
should also be initiated to strengthen national capacity to monitor and manage
environmental resources. Local and regional research capacity will be crucial to
the development of plant varieties and technologies which are truly adapted to
local conditions
· Developing human resources
through formal and on-the-job training; introducing environmental concerns into
educational curricula and agricultural extension messages; and increasing public
awareness through media coverage, general awareness campaigns, and extension
services.
· Establishing Geographical
Information Systems (GISs) that incorporate adequate environmental information.
Lack of operationally meaningful and reliable environmental data is a major
problem. It tends to result in misconceptions about natural resource problems
and the consequent risk that policy measures will be misdirected. Urgent needs
include assessments of forest cover, soil erosion and soil capability,
desertification risks and the distribution of human and livestock populations.
This is clearly an area in which donors can provide support and expertise and
governments need to act. It is important to develop national capacity to gather
and analyze information in-country: properly designed and operated .Geo
graphical Information Systems can be extremely helpful in this regard. GISs make
use of aerial photography, remote sensing, and actual ground inspections and
data collection GISs will be particularly useful not only to monitor the
progress of natural resource degradation and destruction, butmore
importantlyto assess land capability for venous uses and, thus, to provide
the basis for sound land use planning.
NEAPs are intended to be evolutionarydeveloping policies
through field experience as well as national-level analysis. They should lead to
the empowerment of the nongovernmental sector, not just by providing funds for
small scale community activities through national environmental funds' but also
by drawing large numbers of village and district representatives into
consultative forums A nongovernmental advisory body was part of the
institutional arrangements set up, for example, under the Lesotho NEAP.
Considerable external support has been provided for the NEAP
process, from bilateral and multilateral agencies and NGOs (such as the World
Wildlife Fund, the World Resources Institute, and the International Institute
for Environment and Development External expertise is made available to the
countries undertaking NEAP preparation, and aid agency polices are coordinated
in the process, with the NEAP forming the basis for coordination. Where NEAPs
have led to the preparation of national environmental investment plans (as in
Madagascar and Mauritius), donors have substantially oversubscribed the
programs. A National Environmental Action Plan can therefore become the major
preparatory instrument for addressing the issues discussed in this chapter.
Notes
1. An effort has been under way since 1986 to establish the
information base for sound water resource planning in Sub-Saharan Africa A
number of multilateral and bila teral agencies and donors (including the ADB,
UNDP, UNDTCD, WMO, the World Bank, the EEC and France) are collaborating in a
multiyear program,
Sub-Saharan Africa Hydrological Assessment, to assist all SSA
countries in creating or improving a sound hydrometric base for the purpose of
planning and evaluating water resource development programs and projects. This
effort covers surface water resources, hydrometeorology, and groundwater.
Initial reports for a number of countries are available from the World Bank's
Agriculture and Rural Development Department.
2. Climate change is likely to have significant impact on water
supplies and regional hydrological systems, particularly in regions already
facing water shortages. This makes prudent planning so much more important. Even
relatively small changes in precipitation and temperature can have significant
effects on the volume and tuning of runoff, especially in and semiarid regions
(Frederick 1993
63)