![]() | Obstacles to Tree Planting in Arid and Semi-Arid lands: Comparative Case Studies from India and Kenya (UNU, 1982, 63 p.) |
![]() | ![]() | Acknowledgements |
![]() | ![]() | Summary and conclusions |
![]() | ![]() | 1. Introduction and purpose of the study |
![]() | ![]() | The United Nations University programme |
![]() | ![]() | Objective of the study |
![]() | ![]() | Choice of study areas |
![]() | ![]() | Definitions and distribution of arid and semi-arid lands |
![]() | ![]() | Benefits of trees-the "4-E Package" |
![]() | ![]() | Recent trends in forestry |
![]() | ![]() | 2. India |
![]() | ![]() | Forestry policy, strategy, and organization |
![]() | ![]() | Selection of the study area |
![]() | ![]() | Resources and needs for forest products and services |
![]() | ![]() | Overcoming the major obstacles to tree planting |
![]() | ![]() | The Gujarat community forestry project |
![]() | ![]() | 3. Kenya |
![]() | ![]() | Land Tenure and use |
![]() | ![]() | Definition and distribution of the arid and semi-arid zones |
![]() | ![]() | Government policy on arid zone development |
![]() | ![]() | Forestry organization and policy |
![]() | ![]() | Rural afforestation and extension |
![]() | ![]() | Needs for forest products and services in the arid zone |
![]() | ![]() | Current programmes of afforestation in the arid zone |
![]() | ![]() | Overcoming the major obstacles to tree planting |
![]() | ![]() | 4. India and Kenya: Comparisons and contrasts |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Environmental and technical factors |
![]() | ![]() | Institutional factors |
![]() | ![]() | Social and economic factors |
![]() | ![]() | Appendix 1. Outline of a four-week training course in community forestry and extension at the commonwealth forestry institute Oxford |
![]() | ![]() | Appendix 2. Proposal for a 35-hour course in agro-forestry for agricultural students (third-year degree) |
![]() | ![]() | Appendix 3. Summer courses at the commonwealth forestry institute, Oxford |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | Other UNU publications |
Until the early 1970s little was known by Forest Department staff about any forests outside the gazetted forest areas, partly because of deficiencies in the legislation and partly because they were of very low priority. The arid areas were considered a problem for range management officers to deal with rather than foresters. Since 1975, however, the Forest Department has been engaged in a Rural Afforestation Extension Scheme (RAES). The ultimate aim is to have an advisory or extension forester in each of Kenya's 41 administrative districts, and to date some 26 districts have a measure of support from the Forest Department within the RAES.
The scheme began with the more highly populated districts where potential productivity was greater and where adjacent, indigenous forests existed. It has now spread to the ASAL in such districts as Turkana, Narok, Kajiado, Garissa, and Tana River. It is difficult to obtain precise figures on areas or trees planted, or on survival and yield of useful products, but the Forest Department is currently requesting a large component for the RAES to be included in the World Bank's Third Forestry Project Loan now in preparation. The objects are to prevent the uncontrolled destruction of existing vegetation and to enable rural populations to satisfy their requirements.