Pavle Savic
President, Academy of Sciences of Serbia
It is my privilege to welcome you with the wish that your efforts
should provide the greatest possible contribution in solving the problems laid
in the basis of our civilization. In other words, I wish you full success in the
task that you have undertaken to carry out as men of science, inspired by human
goals. Problems which are imposing themselves on every thoughtful creature of
our times and on which the destiny of the human race is depending, undoubtedly
are those which are the topic of this and other worldwide endeavours in our
times.
Let me explain in a few lines why I consider that questions with
which the seminar is dealing are not only of vital interest for the further
development of our civilization and its role in the humanization of society, but
as well of vital importance for its very survival. I have surveyed material
prepared for this seminar and studied it as carefully as I could, and I wouldn't
like to repeat what is written there for I want to save your precious time.
We all want, and in our vision of the future we strive, that our
image of the future should be more human than the total pre-history of
contemporary civilization. What premises for this vision do we have?
The main characteristics of the present times are the geometrical
progression of the birth rate and the increasing expansion of population of our
planet; and the exhaustion of classical energy resources, whereas energy
resources are the roots of development of every civilization. That means that we
are at a turning point between old and new civilizations, or, as Pecujlic would
say in his study, we are on the threshold of "the future which has begun."
In the analysis of the structure of our civilization we must point
to the great potential, both useful and destructive possibilities, of nuclear
energy, which already substitutes for classic resources and imposes itself by
its inexhaustible possibilities as the only possible successor of dying
civilization based upon exploitation of classical energy resources.
Our generation, and generations that are coming, have to carry a
heavy burden, because this change of civilizations causes revolutionary changes
in the structure of human society: in the still-powerful capitalist society with
its means of production vested in private property and a hired labour force
alienated from surplus labour, as stated by Marx in his scientific analysis,
while, on the other hand, socialist relations are accomplished and efforts are
being put forward in creating such relations in specific conditions created by
the history of each particular nation: when super-developed and extremely
underdeveloped human communities simultaneously exist; when millions of men,
women, and children are dying of starvation and diseases, and a minority enjoys
the benefits of accumulated wealth.
You know all this better than I do, because you are dealing with
these problems as specialists. Therefore, from the domain of sociology and
political economy, I shall move to the field I am more familiar with.
Besides the nuclear resources of energy which nowadays exist as a
reality, but are as well as a monopoly of super-powers, technology is using
electronics in different ways: lasers, cybernetic computers as a special
application of electronics, etc.
No reasonable man would expect, taking into consideration these
conditions of our times, that technological development by itself can remove the
increasing potential differences which from day to day threaten ever more to
cause a spark.
Furthermore, no reasonable man would expect that the increase of
population will stop by itself or that technological development by itself will
provide the humanization of human society. We must be well aware that only by
the conscious endeavours and active efforts of all progressive forces, by
agreements and regulations agreed upon and based on scientific results, may
threatening dangers to the survival of the human race be overcome. These dangers
are not only in the destructive power of nuclear weapons, in the event of their
application, but, although invisible at the first sight, far-reaching
consequences for the human race lie hidden in biological discoveries, genetic
mutations caused by chemical means, and pollution of the human environment by an
unreasonable struggle for profit. Even today the situation in the human
environment has been brought to an alarming state in technologically developed
countries, and especially in developing countries which are procuring obsolete
technology and thus becoming subject to neo-colonialistic dependence on
technologically developed countries.
In such a complex situation as the contemporary world is, we come
to the conclusion that it is necessary to organize endeavours of all progressive
forces in order to provide that scientific achievements serve the majority
instead of the minority. It is not a question of whether it should be done in
the interests of morality, but whether it should be done in the interests of
survival of the human race.
In order to be more explicit, I shall use an example from the
history of the Spartan people who, in order to survive, hurled from the Tarpeian
cliff all cripples, because they were only a dead weight and endangered the
survival of this people. Our civilization is facing the same problem; in the
interest of the human race's survival and the further development of productive
forces we must find a Tarpeian cliff from which not people but all obstacles on
the path to the aims of their more human life shall be hurled. That means,
firstly, to be aware that the interests of the people are above the interests of
individuals or particular castes; that social responsibility for the application
of scientific and technological achievements should be enhanced; that the
developed must endeavour to contribute to the development of the economically
and technologically underdeveloped in order to accelerate the process of
development of productive forces and to avoid the perilous consequences of
existing and increasing contradictions. I would like to stress the following
contradiction which governs the development of human society: the idea is born
individually, but it is put into practice by collective work. This means that a
man invents, but society undertakes the use, and responsibility for the use, of
discoveries and technological processes in the interest of the community. I
point to this in contrast to utopian and totally senseless tendencies to stop
the process of development of science and technology, to stop progress because
the world is going to perish because of new inventions.
It seems absurd, but it is true, One need only observe mass
movements against the erection of nuclear plants, movements that are developing
in technologically developed countries. It would be enough to inform people that
they are under full and responsible control of science. But they also frequently
undertake senseless endeavours to stop progress, to turn the historical course,
as at the time of the introduction of the first railway or electricity.
At the end, I would like to express my sincere belief that the
efforts which we put forward may make science and technology become the
properties of society as a whole, providing for the humanization of human
relations and creating the basis for a different, more human morality which
conforms more to the conscience and welfare of people than one based upon the
right of the stronger. I welcome you once more and wish you success in your
work.