![]() | Science and Technology in the Transformation of the World (UNU, 1982, 496 p.) |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Foreword |
![]() | ![]() | Opening addresses |
![]() | ![]() | Zivorad Kovacevic |
![]() | ![]() | Pavle Savic |
![]() | ![]() | Miroslav Pecujlic |
![]() | ![]() | Kinhide Mushakoji |
![]() | ![]() | The gear-box of priorities |
![]() | ![]() | Anouar Abdel-Malek |
![]() | ![]() | Le nécessaire et le possible dans la formation du mondial (Keynote Address) |
![]() | ![]() | Henri Lefebvre |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Première Partie: Le Mondial, Esquisse d'une Analyse |
![]() | ![]() | Deuxième Partie: L'Informationnel et sa Problématique a l'Echelle Mondiale |
![]() | ![]() | Conclusion |
![]() | ![]() | Session I: Science and technology as formative factors of contemporary civilization - from domination to liberation |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | Report on session I |
![]() | ![]() | Technology and society |
![]() | ![]() | Ralko Tomovic |
![]() | ![]() | Conclusion |
![]() | ![]() | Paradigmes scientifiques et auto-détermination humaine |
![]() | ![]() | Yves Barel |
![]() | ![]() | Science and the making of contemporary civilization |
![]() | ![]() | J. Leite Lopes |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | I. The physical image of the world |
![]() | ![]() | II. Science and underdevelopment in Latin America |
![]() | ![]() | III. Science and dependent development |
![]() | ![]() | IV. Endogenization of science in which society? |
![]() | ![]() | V. The aims of science |
![]() | ![]() | VI. Science for liberation |
![]() | ![]() | Notes |
![]() | ![]() | Session II: Technology generation and transfer - Transformation alternatives |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | Report on session II |
![]() | ![]() | The collective self-reliance of developing countries in the fields of science and technology |
![]() | ![]() | Slobodan Ristic |
![]() | ![]() | I. General considerations |
![]() | ![]() | II. Co-operation among developing countries in developing national potentials |
![]() | ![]() | Ill. The strengthening of the negotiating position of developing countries in science and technology |
![]() | ![]() | IV. Instead of a conclusion |
![]() | ![]() | Notes |
![]() | ![]() | Science and technology in Japanese history: university and society |
![]() | ![]() | Konji Kawano |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | I. Japan before the second world war |
![]() | ![]() | II. The change after the second world war |
![]() | ![]() | III. The significance of ''the age of local communities'' |
![]() | ![]() | Legal aspects of the transfer of technology in modern society |
![]() | ![]() | Vestry Besarovic |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | The relevance of the legal order to the transfer of technological knowledge |
![]() | ![]() | Some proposed measures on the national and international levels |
![]() | ![]() | Philosophy (concepts) of scientific and technological development |
![]() | ![]() | Vladimir Slambuk |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | I. Development and underdevelopment |
![]() | ![]() | II. Definition of some basic terms |
![]() | ![]() | III. Existing philosophies of scientific-technological development |
![]() | ![]() | IV. Self-reliance |
![]() | ![]() | Bibliography |
![]() | ![]() | Session III: Biology, medicine, and the future of mankind |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | Report on session III |
![]() | ![]() | La maîtrise de la vie: Pour quoi faire? |
![]() | ![]() | Bruno Ribes |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | I. Necessite et enjeux |
![]() | ![]() | II. La 'logique' du vivant |
![]() | ![]() | III. Quoi faire? |
![]() | ![]() | Restructuring a framework for assessment of science and technology as a driving power for social development: a biosociological approach |
![]() | ![]() | Yuji Mori |
![]() | ![]() | I. Introduction - The darwinian and ned-darwinian systems |
![]() | ![]() | II. Sociobiology or biosociology? how to view humans and their society |
![]() | ![]() | III. Three levels of production and consumption |
![]() | ![]() | IV. Needs |
![]() | ![]() | V. Science and technology as cultural phenomena |
![]() | ![]() | VI. The turning point of social development: space and time |
![]() | ![]() | Notes |
![]() | ![]() | Human aspects of medical sciences: Medical technology and the responsibility of the physician |
![]() | ![]() | Ljubisa Rakic |
![]() | ![]() | Session IV: The control of space and power |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | Report on session IV |
![]() | ![]() | Toward a clearer definition of the role of science and technology in transformation |
![]() | ![]() | Osama A. El-Kholy |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | I. A view of the problem from within |
![]() | ![]() | II. The view from without |
![]() | ![]() | III. Toward a clearer definition of the role of science and technology in transformation |
![]() | ![]() | Appendix I. |
![]() | ![]() | Appendix II. |
![]() | ![]() | Appendix III. |
![]() | ![]() | Notes |
![]() | ![]() | Science, technology, and politics in a changing world |
![]() | ![]() | José A. Silva Michelena |
![]() | ![]() | I. What kind of transformation? |
![]() | ![]() | II. The nature of the crisis |
![]() | ![]() | III. World political trends |
![]() | ![]() | IV. The role of science and technology |
![]() | ![]() | V. A proposition |
![]() | ![]() | Notes |
![]() | ![]() | The technology of repression and repressive technology: The social bearers and cultural consequences |
![]() | ![]() | Zoran Vidakovic |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | I. The vicious circle of repressive technology |
![]() | ![]() | II. The main social figures of repressive technology |
![]() | ![]() | III. Militarization of the economy and science: the birthplace of the metropolitan technocracy |
![]() | ![]() | IV. The genesis of the ''technocratic elite'' in dependent societies |
![]() | ![]() | Nuclear energy in Latin America: The Brazilian case |
![]() | ![]() | Luiz Pinguelli Rosa |
![]() | ![]() | I. The Brazilian nuclear programme and the treaty with the federal Republic of Germany |
![]() | ![]() | II. Perspectives on nuclear energy in Brazil |
![]() | ![]() | III. Nuclear energy and the prestige of national power |
![]() | ![]() | IV. The possibility of latin american nuclear co-operation |
![]() | ![]() | V. The position of brazil regarding nuclear proliferation |
![]() | ![]() | Appendices |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | Session V: From intellectual dependence to creativity |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | Report on session V |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Discussion |
![]() | ![]() | Summary |
![]() | ![]() | La apropiación y la recuperación de las ciencias sociales en el contexto de los proyectos culturales endógenos |
![]() | ![]() | Guillermo Bonfil Batalla |
![]() | ![]() | Introducción |
![]() | ![]() | I. El problema de la creatividad endógena en ciencias sociales. |
![]() | ![]() | Untitled |
![]() | ![]() | III. La formación de una intelectualidad India contemporánea. |
![]() | ![]() | IV. Notas para un proyecto de desarrollo endógeno de las ciencias sociales. |
![]() | ![]() | Notas |
![]() | ![]() | On the edge of a razor blade: the new historical blocs and socio-cultural alternatives in Europe |
![]() | ![]() | Miroslav Pecuilic and Zoran Vidakovic |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | I. The new janus - Two faces of science and technology |
![]() | ![]() | II. The pathology of power and science |
![]() | ![]() | III. The new protagonist - social movements and organic intelligentsia |
![]() | ![]() | IV. Dramatic birth of alternatives |
![]() | ![]() | V. Self-reliance and solidarity (autonomy and new universality) |
![]() | ![]() | Notes |
![]() | ![]() | Science and technology in the history of modern Japan: imitation or endogenous creativity? |
![]() | ![]() | Tetsuro Nakaoka |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Notes |
![]() | ![]() | Science and technology as an organic part of contemporary culture |
![]() | ![]() | Zvonimir Damjanovic |
![]() | ![]() | Joseph Needham's contribution to the history of science and technology in China |
![]() | ![]() | Gregory Blue |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Notes |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | General report on the seminar |
![]() | ![]() | Appendix: Position papers |
![]() | ![]() | Participants |
![]() | ![]() | From the charter of the United Nations University |
Vice-Rector, United Nations University
I have the pleasant obligation to express the gratitude of the UN University to the University of Belgrade, through its Rector, Prefessor Pecujlic, for having accepted to co-sponsor this seminar.
I want also to express, in the name of all the non-Yugoslav participants, our deep appreciation for the hospitality of our colleagues from this great country. I must not fail to insist on the fact that it is especially fortunate that we could hold this seminar in this country, which is indeed the meeting place between East and West, and North and South, since here we can best acquire a good sense about the transformation of the world.
Nowadays, science and technology are treated with a much more critical mind than before, mainly for the following two reasons.
Firstly, because science and technology tend to be monopolized by the major powers, monopolizing knowledge in view of their nuclear hegemony. This creates a hierarchical world order with the super-powers on the top and the developing countries on the bottom.
Secondly, because the R & D activities in science and technology tend to give a disproportionate advantage to big science and big technology through overly centralized management systems' often losing sight of the diversity of local needs and environmental conditions.
Yugoslavia, through its non-aligned position, takes a position clearly most relevant to the first aspect I have just mentioned. Through its experiment in self-management and decentralization, it provides also an interesting answer to the second problem mentioned above.
This is why the UN University is extremely happy to hold this seminar in this great country. The UN University tries to become an international scientific forum of researchers of different cultural backgrounds and ideologies, and who hold different paradigms. This is a difficult task, especially when it has to deal with problems so controversial as the one to be treated in this seminar.
Many international organizations which seek to produce reports at the end of their expert meetings are stressing the points of agreement, emphasizing consensus. The UN University encourages rather diversifying views and a frank and critical debate aiming at determining clearly the roots of divergence's. This approach, only possible within a university, must make the UN University a place where new alternative perspectives on the world in transformation can be formulated freely by the researchers collaborating with this institution.
This is why I urge all the participants of this meeting to feel free to disagree. We share, I hope, at least a common interest in ascertaining that science and technology serve humanity and guarantee its survival, and not that science and technology serve the cause of the destruction of human life, welfare, and development.
Being sure to agree on this essential point I call upon all the participants of this seminar to contribute, to sharpen this debate which is of special relevance in the UN calendar coming as it does after the UNCSTD Conference in Vienna. Thus it is at this historical moment that I call upon all the participants to put forth their reflections on Science and Technology in the Transformation of the World.