Annex: A tool for resettlement assistance planning
People-Oriented Assessment and Planning
A useful tool for assistance planners has been developed by
UNHCR. It is a "framework" or perspective which uncovers the most important
issues to be addressed in programs to aid the displaced. Originally designed to
improve the access of displaced women and their participation in programs, it
also addresses the needs of children and increases the opportunities for
displaced people to assume responsibility for their own management and to
optimize use of available resources.
When persons are displaced, their normal social and economic
roles are disrupted. Their roles and responsibilities may change constantly from
the moment of displacement into the final stages of recovery. Even if roles
stabilize in long-term displacement, the roles may still be thought of as
temporary and are adjusted as changes occur in the new location. It is vital to
understand the dynamics of the changes in a society as they will determine the
acceptance and success of any project. Even when return to the place of origin
is possible, the situation there is likely to have changed and will require
adjustment by the returnees.
There are three major ground rules for people-oriented planning.
· Displaced
persons must participate. As mentioned in the text of this
module, participation by the displaced men, women and children, is a major
factor in determining whether or not a project will be successful.
· Conduct a
socio-economic analysis for any project whether it is food distribution,
water and sanitation, agriculture, health or social services. This prevents
omission of some people from the program because their time or roles keep them
from participating (particularly women and children).
· Do not make
assumptions based on your own perceptions or stereotypes. Get first hand
information from the displaced about their past and current
situations.
There are three components of the people-oriented analytical
framework:
· Displaced
Population Profile and Context Analysis - A demographic assessment will
reveal the population profile, or how many families, individuals, male and
females, and vulnerable people make up the group. The context analysis then
delves deeper to find out factors which affect behavior such as community norms,
social hierarchy, religious beliefs, nature of the government, economic
conditions, political events, legal parameters, perceived attitudes of other
towards them and their attitudes toward relief workers.
· Activities
Analysis Two basic questions are important here: What were the
displaced doing before? and, What are they doing now? These questions focus on
all domestic, social and political activities, how often and where they were
performed and who carried out the major activities. These questions are crucial
in terms of protection to find out how community members traditionally protected
each other and how that might have changed.
· Use and Control
of Resources Analysis It is necessary to find out what resources
people controlled and used before they were displaced and what resources they
control and use now. It is important to distinguish between controlled
and used, for example, while displaced persons may have owned land
before, they may only be able to use someone else's land now. Resources include
skills, cultural ties, time, labor, education, etc.
Applying the framework. The above questions help to
determine the best response to meet needs of the displaced population both in
emergency situations and for resettlement and recovery. It helps assistance
agencies be alert to variables concerning age, gender and family status and
reminds planners that displaced persons are active, productive and resourceful
individuals rather than passive victims. It also provides a structure for
organizing information and choosing the best program design. For more details on
the process see these references:
Anderson, Mary B., Ann M Howarth (Brazeau) and Catherine
Overholt, "A Framework for People-Oriented Planning in Refugee Situations Taking
Account of Women, Men and Children, A Practical Planning Tool for Refugee
Workers" UNHCR, Geneva, December, 1992.
Emergency Needs and Resources Assessment Training Module,
UNHCR, Geneva.
Disaster Management Training Programme
To evaluate the effectiveness of this module we would appreciate
it if you would remove this survey form, complete it, and send it to the address
noted at the end. The information you provide will help us to improve a future
edition as well as other publications produced for DMTP.
Title of module ______________________________________________
Language:
English
Spanish
French
Portuguese
Arabic
Farsi
1. For what organization do you
work?_________________________
2. What is your job
title?____________________________________
3. In what country do you
work?______________________________
4. For what purpose did you use the
module?
___Training workshop. Was the workshop
U.N. sponsored?
Yes
No
What was
your role in the workshop?
Trainee
Trainer
Other (specify)__
___Self-study
___As a
reference document
___Other (please
specify)___________________________________
5. Is the subject matter of the module relevant to
your work?
Yes
No
Please comment:
_______________________________________
6. Do you feel that the training material was useful
to your disaster management responsibilities?
Yes
No Please
comment:_____________________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
7. Did you find the writing style:
overly simplistic or
too
technical?
Please comment:
_______________________________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
8. Does the module adequately cover the subject?
Yes
No
What could be added, deleted or changed
to increase the effectiveness of the
module?
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
9. What would you identify as the strengths or
limitations of the module?
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
10. Please answer the following questions about the
module.
|
|
|
Did the questions help you better understand the module's
content? |
Yes
|
No
|
Did the case studies adequately illustrate and clarify the
module's content? |
Yes
|
No
|
Were technical terms clearly defined? |
Yes
|
No
|
Do the text fulfill the learning objectives stated at the
beginning of each chapter? |
Yes
|
No
|
Was the graphic presentation effective (page layout, use of
figures and illustrations)? |
Yes
|
No
|
Would you recommend this module to your colleagues? |
Yes
|
No
|
11. Is there any information in the module that you
think is factually incorrect, incomplete or outdated?
Yes
No If Yes please specify, citing page numbers where
possible.
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
12. Do you know of any case studies that you think
would better explain the concepts contained in the module? Please give us a
reference or as full a description as possible.
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
If you are a trainer and have used the Trainer's Guide,
please answer the following questions in addition to those on the preceding
page.
1. How much did you use the Trainer's Guide for this
module in designing your training session?
Completely
Substantially
Some
Not at all
How much do you expect to use it in the future?
Completely
Substantially
Some
Not at
all
2. Did you use the "overhead transparencies"
provided with the module?
Yes
No
Would you expect to use them in the
future?
Yes
No
How could the
"overhead transparencies" be improved?
_________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
3. Did you use the "learning experiences" in the
Trainer's Guide for this module?
Yes
No
Would you expect to use them in the
future?
Yes
No
How could the
learning experiences be improved?
_____________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
4. Did you design additional "learning experiences"?
Yes
No
If Yes please provide a brief
description of the activities.
________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
5. Did you use the case studies in the module?
Yes
No
How could the case studies be improved?
____________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
Thank you for taking time to fill
out and return this survey. Please send to:
DMTP, DHA-Geneva, Palais de Nations, CH-1211 Geneva 10,
Switzerland
Fax 41-22-788
8221