I'll do my best to answer your "two or three" questions :-)
> 1. I have seen that the metadata asigned to Subject is stored like its hierarchy
> position, it means for example 184.108.40.206. This makes unusable for searching (I could
> understand that else Greenstone has to put the string linked with 1, the linked with
> 1.2 and so on), we want to use some standard theasurus for putting Subject, perhaps
> this is a more DC related question, how could I obtain a good solution combining the
> two problems, I mean giving the user the posibility to explore the theasurus tree, and
> searching by individuals words from the theasurus?
I'm not sure I entirely understand the problem... are you talking about allowing the user
to do this when they are browsing a built Greenstone collection? Or when they are
creating a Greenstone collection using the GLI?
> 2. How could I present in a Format a repetable field. Perhaps a document has 2 o 3
> authors and [dc.Creator] only puts the first (or is a format problem?)
Unfortunately this is a limitation of Greenstone's format statements. It is on our "to
do" list, and also on Stephen De Gabrielle's (who may get to it before we do!).
> 3. A very-very basic question (perhaps must read user-guide, have read only developer
> and configuration documents) how could I search for strimming terms, I mean to search
> "Zym%" and return Zimerman, Zimuslink, etc. Is in somewhere all the options (left
> strimming,right.. etc)
Greenstone offers "stemming", but not wildcard matching. You can turn stemming on by
going to the Preferences page and looking at the "word endings" option.
> 4. Last. I've seen at nzdl that the 2.41 comes with a combo-box to choice the via that
> access to the information, this could help us a lot because will be 4 or 5 ways to
> explore hierarchichal content, and have seen that could put authentication. The
> authentication could be used for some collections or for all the site? Could you tell
> when expect to release it?
I'm not sure when version 2.41 will be released, but I don't think it will be for at
least a month or two. You can get the most up-to-date source code (including these
changes) by getting Greenstone from CVS, however.
> 5. One more. Somebody has experienced making some integration between Zope and
> Greenstone? We plan to use Zope/Plone for the user identification, uploading the
> document, tracking of the process document, portal services and so on, and Greenstone
> for the Digital Library search...
I'm afraid I haven't even heard of Zope or Plone, so I can't help you with this one
sorry. Hopefully someone else on the list will have some thoughts.
Sorry I didn't have anything positive to say!