
| Country Report Parallel Research Programme - ICRC Worldwide Consultation on the Rules of War (International Committee of the Red Cross , 1999, 38 p.) |
| (introduction...) |
| Executive summary |
| The settings |
![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | Colombia |
![]() | Bosnia-Herzegovina |
![]() | Philippines |
| Broad areas of comparability |
![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | Barrier between combatants and civilians |
![]() | Practices putting civilians at risk |
![]() | Treatment of captured combatants |
![]() | Child combatants |
![]() | Why norms of war are not observed |
![]() | Expectations for the future |
| Areas of divergence and possible bias |
![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | Awareness of and views on the Geneva Conventions |
![]() | Prosecution of war criminals |
![]() | Awareness of the ICRC |
![]() | Reported war experiences |
![]() | Projected behaviour in war |
| Concluding assessment |
| Annex 1: General methodology |
| Annex 2: Questionnaire* |
For the great majority of questions asked in the ICRC consultation on limits in war, there is no consistent bias evident in the results. Based on this parallel research test, there is good reason to have confidence in the findings for the 12 countries central to this consultation.