Cover Image
close this bookThe political economy of the common market in milk and dairy products in the European Union. (FAO Economic and Social Development Paper - 142) (1997)
View the document(introduction...)
View the documentPreface
View the documentAcknowledgements
View the documentI. INTRODUCTION
View the documentII. THE THEORY OF ECONOMIC POLICY ANALYSIS
View the documentIII. THE DECISION-MAKING MACHINERY OF THE EU
View the documentIV. THE AIMS OF POLICY FOR AGRICULTURE AND THE MILK SECTOR
View the documentV. AN OUTLINE OF THE EU SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR MILK
View the documentVI. OTHER ASPECTS OF THE POLICY FOR THE MILK SECTOR
View the documentVII. THE IMPLEMENTATION FRAMEWORK OF THE EU MILK SUPPORT SYSTEM
Open this folder and view contentsVIII. PRACTICAL IMPLEMENTATION AND CONDUCT OF POLICY
Open this folder and view contentsIX. PRACTICAL CONDUCT IN THREE MEMBER STATES
View the documentX. ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF POLICY
View the documentXI. WTO/GATT AND THE FUTURE OF MILK POLICY
Open this folder and view contentsREFERENCES
Open this folder and view contentsANNEX I. MANY A SLIP: STUDYING POLICY DELIVERY SYSTEMS¹
View the documentAPPENDIX to ANNEX I

(introduction...)

by
Roland E. Williams
Surbiton, Surrey
United Kingdom

FAO ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT PAPER - 142

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Rome, 1997

Paper prepared for the Agriculture and Economic
Development Analysis Division
FAO Economic and Social Department

The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.

M-60
ISBN 92-5-104080-X

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. Applications for such permission, with a statement of the purpose and extent of the reproduction, should be addressed to the Director, Information Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00100 Rome, Italy.

© FAO 1997

This paper studies the policy delivery systems (PDSs) in the European Union (EU) for the implementation of the common dairy policy. It looks carefully at the stated aims and objectives of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and the dairy policy at the PDS Itself and at the conduct of policy. The analysis is based on four objective performance criteria: effectiveness (in fulfilment of aims), efficiency enforceability and equity. Analysis of both the price support members. Three case-studies illustrate how the common policy had to be partially adapted in Italy and the United Kingdom because of differences In the market and processing industry structure and show how the high level of efficiency of the PDS in the Netherlands affects the system throughout the EU. It is argued that the system is broadly effective in achieving the target price and that since the introduction of the quota policy it has been more effective (unexpectedly) in fulfilling the EU’s farm income alms. The policy has not been efficient at all times insofar as it encouraged overproduction of unwanted products with weak markets at supported prices. The policy has proved enforceable in its detail, although it has been necessary to rely on the European Court of Justice to settle difficult issues when political machinery has failed. In terms of equity the policy has strengthened the rural economy in some of the EU’s more remote areas, but it has also tolerated large differences around common price levels. The author shows how the aims of policy have tended to shift over time. The largest shift has come with the 1992 General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). which poses the biggest problem for the future of the EU dairy policy.