Cover Image
close this bookProtein-Energy Interactions (International Dietary Energy Consultative Group - IDECG, 1991, 437 pages)
close this folderQuantitative relationships between protein and energy metabolism: Influence of body composition
View the document(introductory text...)
View the documentAbstract
View the document1. Introduction
View the document2. Theoretical basis
View the document3. Constancy of tissue mobilisation
View the document4. Tissue mobilisation in the obese
View the document5. Allometric analysis
View the document6. Conclusions
View the documentReferences

4. Tissue mobilisation in the obese

A closer examination of the pattern of tissue mobilization during starvation in 'obese' and 'normal' subjects reveals some interesting features. Figure 3 shows the pattern of urinary nitrogen loss during the 31-day fast in a normal weight subject (60.6 kg) studied by BENEDICT (1915) and compares it with an obese subject (154 kg) studied by GILDER et al. (1967) and starved for a comparable period. After the first week, the obese subject lost less fasting urinary nitrogen than the normal weight subject.

This difference in nitrogen loss is further highlighted if we compare the P ratio of normal subjects (Table 1) with that of obese subjects (Table 2). The obese have a lower P ratio and appear to mobilise about 5% of their energy from protein breakdown, in contrast to normal weight subjects, who mobilised approximately 20% of their energy from protein breakdown. It therefore appears that normal weight and obese subjects respond differently during starvation, and that the adipose tissue exerts a profound influence on protein mobilisation.

Although there are no data on P ratio and direct body composition measures in humans, weight and height measured in subjects cited in Tables 1 and 2 were supplemented with single point measurements of BMR and nitrogen loss during fasting on seven more subjects. These values are shown in Figure 4. It can be seen that a close agreement exists between the P ratio and the BMI at the start of the fast. The Figure also shows GARROW's (1983) proposed relationship between BMI and body fat. It is clear from the graph that the P ratio declines in a curvilinear fashion with increasing adiposity. It therefore appears that the tendency to use protein as a fuel in starvation is much lower in the obese than the non-obese human, as has already been suggested by experiments on laboratory animals (HENRY, 1984).

Table 2. P ratio in obese human subjects during fasting

Subject No.

Initial body weight [kg]

Duration of fast [d]

Fasting urinary nitrogen [g/d]

BMR [kcal/d]

P ratio

1

123

38

3.90

1985

0.049

2

132

38

4.00

1707

0.058

3

147

38

3.27

1773

0.046

4

154

21

4.40

1740

0.063

5

190

21

4.56

2480

0.046

6

166

14

3.41

2100

0.040

7

73

14

2.83

1200

0.059

8

124

21

5.70

2328

0.061

9

120

18

3.20

1984

0.040

10

103

4

4.50

1509

0.074





Mean

0.0536






± 0.011


Figure 3. Mean fasting urinary nitrogen loss in normal weight and obese subjects.


Figure 4. Relationship between P ratio, W/H2 and percentage fat in humans.