
| Activity, Energy Expenditure and Energy Requirements of Infants and Children (International Dietary Energy Consultative Group - IDECG, 1989, 412 pages) |
| Short- and long-term effects of low or restricted energy intakes on the activity of infants and children |
![]() | 3. Preschool children |
![]() |
|
3.3.1. Uganda
RUTISHAUSER and WHITEHEAD (1972) used a modified time-motion method to evaluate the physical activity of 20 black, undernourished children and 5 well-nourished children of European parents, 1.5 to 3 years old. The black children weighed less and were shorter than the Europeans. Their dietary energy intake was 67 ±14 kcal/kg/d, or 33% lower than current recommendations (FAO/WHO/UNU, 1985). Dietary intakes measured in two of the expatriate children averaged 109 kcal/kg/d.
During two consecutive 5-hour daytime periods, an observer recorded the activities performed by a child and classified them into six categories. Table 3 shows that the African children spent significantly more time sitting and standing, and less time walking and running than the European children.
Applying the energy cost of activities of older children and adults (PASSMORE and DURNIN, 1955; DURNIN and PASSMORE, 1967) to the time allocations shown in Table 3, Rutishauser and Whitehead estimated that the Ugandan children had a daily expenditure of 78 kcal/kg/d, while the European children spent 98 kcal/kg/d. Using the energy cost of activities measured in preschool children to avoid the errors of applying data from adults (TORUN 1983; TORUN et al., 1983), the daily energy expenditure of the Ugandan and European children can be calculated as 74 and 79 kcal/kg/d, respectively. This left the latter with more dietary energy available for growth and for physical activity during the unsupervised hours of the study.
Table 3. Estimated time allocation of native Ugandan and European children, 1.5-3 years old (mean + standard deviation)
|
Time allocated (minutes) | ||
|
Activity |
African |
European |
|
In bed a |
600 to 720 |
660 to 780 |
|
Lying down |
81 ±87 |
70 ±56 |
|
Being carried |
7 ±17 |
31 ±46 |
|
Sitting |
300 ±64 ** |
190 ±43 |
|
Standing |
265 ±93 * |
143 ±54 |
|
Walking |
108 ±46 ** |
234 ±54 |
|
Running |
17 ±17 ** |
54 ±32 |
a
Ranges estimated from mothers'
information.
Means differ: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.
Source: Calculated from RUTISHAUSER and WHITEHEAD, 1972.
3.3.2 Guatemala
TORUN and CHEW (unpublished) studied 69 boys and girls, 26 years old, who lived in a poor neighborhood in the outskirts of Guatemala city. The activities that they performed between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. were recorded and timed on two separate weekdays using a modified time-motion technique (TORUN, 1984). The 56 activities recorded were classified in six categories of physical effort, from sedentary to very heavy (Table 4).
Table 4. Activities performed by preschool children in a marginal area of Guatemala, and classified according to effort. The energy costs of the grouped activities were estimated as multiples of basal metabolic rate
|
Sedentary |
Light |
Moderate |
Moderately heavy |
Heavy |
Very heavy |
|
1.2 x BMR |
2.0 x BMR |
2.25 x BMR |
2.5 x BMR |
3.0 x BMR |
4.0 x BMR |
|
Carried by someone |
Bathe, wash |
Climb up and down |
Bounce on bed |
Carry garbage or water pail |
Run, hop and jump |
|
Eat |
Dress, undress |
Hang clothes |
Climb tree |
Cut firewood |
Run with a load |
|
Hurl stones with sling |
Hammer while sitting |
Miscellaneous play |
Dance, hoola-hoop |
Housechores squatting |
Run uphill |
|
Lie and play |
Lift light objects |
Run and stop (with a ball) |
Jump from a chair |
Running ball-games |
Walk fast uphill |
|
Lie or sit quietly |
Open doors or drawers |
Slide |
Ride scooter |
Swing suspendend from arms | |
|
Nap |
Push a hammock |
Spin around |
Ride tricycle or bicycle |
Walk fast, level ground | |
|
Play guitar |
Push or pull a cart |
Stand and carry something |
Somersaults | ||
|
Sit and play |
Push or pull a light toy |
Sweep floor |
Walk with a load | ||
|
Sit and carry something |
Squat or crawl |
Walk slowly level ground |
Walk slowly uphill | ||
|
Sit on swing |
Stand and play |
Walk with stick and hoop |
Wrestle | ||
|
Sleep late |
Throw a ball |
Wash clothes | |||
|
Stand quietly |
Walk with pauses | ||||
|
Stand and sit |
Source: TORUN and CHEW, unpublished observations.
Twenty-one children were considered mildly malnourished, based on weights-for-height between 81 and 90% of the NCHS/WHO median values, whereas 43 had between 91 and 110%, and 5 between 112 and 119% of the standard weights-for-height.
Compared with the well-nourished children, the malnourished spent 11.2% more time in sedentary activities, and 4.8, 1.7 and 2.5% less time in light, heavy and very heavy activities, respectively (Figure 4A). The longer time spent in light physical activities at the expense of those that demanded more energy became even clearer, when the activities were classified in only three categories of physical effort (Figure 4B).


Energy expenditure was estimated applying energy-cost factors of 1.2, 2, 2.25, 2.5, 3 and 4 times basal metabolic rate (X BMR) to the six categories of activities observed. Based on information provided by the mothers, sleeping time was added at 1.0 X BMR, and an energy expenditure of 1.52 or 1.43 X BMR was assumed for the balance of 25 hours. The children with weight-for-height > 90% of the NCHS median had an estimated expenditure of 81 kcal/kg/d, compared with 77 kcal/kg/d among the mildly malnourished.
Sixty of the 69 children were studied again, 2 and 4 months after the beginning of a nutritional education and supplementation program, on 2 separate weekdays each time (TORUN and CHEW, unpublished). At the end of the 4-month period, weight-for-height had increased by 3% or more in 23 children, remained stable within ±3% in 27, and decreased more than 3% in 10 children. An analysis was done of the time that those three groups of children dedicated before and after the intervention to activities that demanded different levels of physical effort.
Figure 5 shows that the children whose nutritional status improved, reduced the time dedicated to sedentary and light activities and significantly increased the time in moderate activities. On the other hand, the children whose nutritional status deteriorated, increased the time devoted to sedentary activities by reducing heavy activities.

The comparison between groups (Figure 5), showed that the children whose weight-for-height improved: (a) reduced the time spent in sedentary and light activities, in contrast with the other two groups, (b) increased the performance of moderate physical activities, and (c) continued with the same proportion of heavy activities, in contrast with the children who lost weight-for-height.