Cover Image
close this bookEnergy and Protein requirements, Proceedings of an IDECG workshop, November 1994, London, UK, Supplement of the European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (International Dietary Energy Consultative Group - IDECG, 1994, 198 pages)
close this folderAppendix Criteria for valid nitrogen balance measurement of protein requirements
View the document(introductory text...)
View the documentLong-term studies
View the documentAnalysis of multilevel short-term balance studies
View the documentReferences

References

Huang PC, Chong HE & Rand W (1972): Obligatory urinary and faecal nitrogen losses in young Chinese men. J. Nutr. 102, 16051613.

Rand WM, Uauy R & Scrimshaw NS (1984): Protein energy requirement studies in developing countries: results of international research. Fd Nutr. Bull. Suppl. 10.

Scrimshaw NS, Bistrian BR, Brunser O. Elia M, Jackson AA, Jian Z-M, Kinney JM, Rosenberg IH & Wolfe RR (1991): Effect of disease on desirable protein/energy ratios. In Protein-energy interaction, eds NS Scrimshaw & B Schürch pp 385-398. Lausanne: IDECG.

UNU/WHP (1979): Protein energy requirements under conditions prevailing in developing countries: current knowledge and research needs. Fd Nutr. Bull. Suppl. 1.

European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Directions to Contributors

Manuscripts should be sent to either:

Professor JS Garrow
Dr JC Seidell
The Dial House
Head Department of Chronic Disease and Environmental Epidemiology
93 Uxbridge Road
Rickmansworth
Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9 PO Box 1
Hertfordshire
WD3 2DQ, UK
3720 BA Bilthoven The Netherlands

Send original plus two copies of paper and illustrations: type preferably on A4 paper (210 × 298 mm) single-sided and double-spaced with 25 mm margins. A covering letter, which should be signed by all authors, must state that the material has not been submitted for publication elsewhere while under consideration for EJCN. Identify the name, full postal address, ad fax number, of corresponding author. Typescripts will not normally be returned to authors.

The layout of the paper should be as follows:

1. Title page, giving a concise but informative title, and the names and affiliations (but not degrees) of all authors.
2. Structured abstract of not more than 250 words, under the headings:

Objective - what was the main question or hypothesis tested ?
Design - was it randomized, case-control, retrospective, etc.?
Setting - where was the study done? primary or tertiary care?
Subjects - how recruited, how many started, how many dropped out?
Interventions - methods used, and duration of administration.

Main outcome measures:
Results - indicate 95% condifence intervals and exact P value for effects.
Conclusions - answer (significant or not) to main question.
Sponsorship - University? charity? commercial organization?
Descriptors - preferably use up to 6 words, chosen from MEDLINE MeSH, which best describe your paper. Theses will be used for indexing your paper in the EJCN, and also help retrieval from computer databases.

NOTE: Further advice on preparation of structured abstracts can be obtained from Haynes RB et al. Annals of Internal Medicine 1990; 113: 69-76. Failure to provide a structured abstract will delay editorial processing of the paper.
3. Text: organized as Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, References. Number pages consecutively. Indicate where tables and figures should appear. References in text are indicated in the text by name and date, ad listed at the end of the paper in alphabetical order of first author. See recent issues of the EJCN for citation style.
4. Tables and Figures with legends which enable them to be understood withour reference to the text should be on separate sheets at the end of the text. Artwork should be suitable for direct photographic reproduction.

Units and abbreviations. Use Sl units where possible. Energy should be given as kJ or MJ (with equivalent kcal or Mcal in parentheses).

Statistical methods. For normally distributed data, mean (SD) is the preferred summary statistic. Relative risks should be expressed as odds ratios with 95% confidence interval. To compare two methods for measuring a variable the method of Bland & Altman (1986) Lancet i, 307 should be used: for this, calculation of P only is not appropriate.

Ethical approval. Research studies involving human subjecsts should e approved by the relevant review committee, and such approval must be stated in the Methods section of the paper.

Dietary survey methods. See guidelines published in EJCN 1993: 47: 379-380 or apply to Editorial office for an offprint of these guidelines.

Publication. Proofs will be sent to the corresponding author for marking of printers' errors, together with an order for offprints and reprints.

Funding for this l/D/E/C/G workshop was provided by the United Nations University and the Nestle Foundation.
This publication is available free of charge from
The Secretariat of IDECG c/o Nestlé Foundation P. O. Box 581 1001 Lausanne Switzerland

thanks to a grant from the Nestlé Foundation.