
| Conflict over Natural Resources in South-East Asia and the Pacific (UNU, 1990, 256 pages) |
| Acknowledgements |
| Notes on contributors |
| 1. Introduction |
![]() | (introductory text...) |
![]() | 1.1 Commonalities and directions for future research |
![]() | References |
| 2. Conflict over land-based natural resources in the ASEAN countries |
![]() | (introductory text...) |
![]() | 2.1 The ASEAN region: great wealth and great strife |
![]() | 2.2 The historical roots of conflict |
![]() | 2.3 The plunder of forest resources |
![]() | 2.4 The transformation of a natural resource: from agriculture to agribusiness |
![]() | 2.5 Conflicts over mineral resources |
![]() | 2.6 Development and tribal peoples: resistance to displacement |
![]() | 2.7 Natural resource abuses: a time for change |
![]() | References |
| 3. The Japanese economy and South-East Asia: the examples of the Asahan aluminium and Kawasaki Steel Projects |
![]() | (introductory text...) |
![]() | 3.1 The Japanese miracle |
![]() | 3.2 Eyed of the miracle? |
![]() | 3.3 A new vision of economic: development |
![]() | 3.4 The vision in action: Asahan |
![]() | 3.5 Japan's overseas steel industry |
![]() | 3.6 Kawasaki in Mindanao: the export of pollution |
![]() | 3.7 Conclusion: the comprehensive security system - What price? |
![]() | References |
| 4. International conflict over marine resources in South-East Asia: trends in politicization and militarization |
![]() | (introductory text...) |
![]() | 4.1 Present and future conflict over marine resources |
![]() | 4.2 Common threads in the pattern of conflict |
![]() | 4.3 Conflict |
![]() | 4.4 New directions for co-operation |
![]() | 4.5 Progressive management concepts |
![]() | References |
| 5. Conflict over natural resources in Malaysia: the struggle of small-scale fishermen |
![]() | (introductory text...) |
![]() | 5.1 Introduction |
![]() | 5.2 The 1950s early developments in the Malayan fisheries industry |
![]() | 5.3 The experience with fishing co-operatives, 1957-1965 |
![]() | 5.4 A decade of trawling development, 1960-1970 |
![]() | 5.5 The poverty eradication programme of the 1970s: new deal for small-scale fishermen? |
![]() | 5.6 Policy developments in the 1980s |
![]() | 5.7 Conclusion |
![]() | References |
| 6. Conflict over natural resources in the Pacific |
![]() | (introductory text...) |
![]() | 6.1 The region and its resources |
![]() | 6.2 Conflicts over marine space |
![]() | 6.3 Conflicts over the marine environment |
![]() | 6.4 Conflicting maritime claims |
![]() | 6.5 Conflicts over pelagic resources |
![]() | 6.6 Conflict over seabed mineral resources |
![]() | 6.7 Conclusions |
![]() | References |
| Appendix |
The countries of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) produce a major portion of some of the world's most essential natural resources. From the Philippines, Brunei, Indonesia, Thailand, Malaysia, and Singapore come 82 per cent of the world's production of natural rubber, 70 per cent of copra and coconut products, 70 per cent of tin, 56 per cent of palm-oil, and 50 per cent of hardwood. In addition, the region's seas and rivers account for a significant share of the world's supply of fish and other marine products. Thailand and the Philippines, for example, are major tuna exporters to the US market. Thailand is also one of the world's top rice exporters, and the Philippines boasts the largest pineapple plantation in the world.
Because of the abundance of vital resources in the countries of the ASEAN group, the area has been the scene of various local, national, and international conflicts centring on the use, control, and disposition of natural resources. As control over resources becomes a paramount issue in the drive for national and human survival, disagreements and differences in approaches, priorities, and philosophies emerge. Governments often clash over jurisdiction of lands containing valuable raw materials such as oil and minerals. On the other hand, a government often faces opposition from its own citizens regarding the issue of human rights violations committed by the state as it pursues certain national strategies of development. These conflicts are often portrayed in official pronouncements as being between modernity and tradition, but more often than not the conflict simply reflects the intransigence of institutionalized power and its propensity to impose bureaucratic and technocratic planning models.