Cover Image
close this bookFood and Nutrition Bulletin Volume 20, Number 1, 1999 (UNU, 1999, 181 pages)
close this folderEffects of health and nutrition on cognitive and behavioural development in children in the first three years of life. Part 1: Low birthweight, breastfeeding, and protein-energy malnutrition
View the document(introductory text...)
View the documentAbstract
View the documentIntroduction
View the documentLow birthweight
View the documentStudies of children in the first two years
View the documentStudies of children two to seven years of age
View the documentStudies of children 7 to 17 years of age
View the documentOther outcomes
View the documentInteractions with the environment
View the documentConclusions about the effects of IUGR on development
View the documentBreastfeeding
View the documentStudy design
View the documentShort-term effects of breastfeeding
View the documentLong-term effects of breastfeeding
Open this folder and view contentsMechanism
View the documentConclusions and policy implications
View the documentProtein-energy malnutrition
View the documentSevere malnutrition
Open this folder and view contentsModerate stunting and wasting
View the documentLongitudinal associations
Open this folder and view contentsSupplementation studies
View the documentVulnerable age
View the documentMechanism
View the documentConclusions about mild-to-moderate stunting
View the documentPolicy implications and recommendations
View the documentReferences

Studies of children in the first two years

Most studies evaluating SGA children before 12 months have failed to find differences in developmental levels between SGA and NEW infants [19-22] (table 1) [15, 19-24]. However, a recent Brazilian study showed that SGA babies scored significantly lower on the Bayley mental and motor subscales at 6 months and that the difference increased by 12 months [15].

Pour other studies compared SGA and NEW children between 12 and 24 months, and all found deficits in the mental development of SGA children [20, 21, 23, 24], but in most cases the differences were attributed to particularly vulnerable subgroups. For instance, in a study of American toddlers, only male or African-American SGA children showed a deficit [23]. Others reported that the deficits were almost entirely found in children who had neonatal asphyxia or congenital anomalies [24], and that children with birthweights below 2,300 g were entirely responsible for the deficits in the SGA group [21]. In the remaining study, the difference between groups was only significant in those who had appropriate ponderal indices (API) at birth, indicating that the foetus may have been undernourished in early pregnancy [20].