Cover Image
close this bookEnergy and Protein requirements, Proceedings of an IDECG workshop, November 1994, London, UK, Supplement of the European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (International Dietary Energy Consultative Group - IDECG, 1994, 198 pages)
View the document(introductory text...)
View the documentForeword
close this folderEnergy requirements: general principles
View the document(introductory text...)
View the documentEnergy expenditure as the basis for estimating energy requirements
View the documentMethodology
View the documentImportance of body composition
View the documentPoints of uncertainty requiring further research
View the documentSummary of research needs
View the documentReferences
View the documentDiscussion
View the documentReferences
close this folderEnergy requirements of adults: an update on basal metabolic rates (BMRs) and physical activity levels (PALs)
View the document(introductory text...)
View the documentIntroduction
View the documentVariability in adult BMRs
View the documentPredictive equations to estimate bmrs of adults
View the documentEthnic differences in BMR
View the documentEffects of migration from tropical to temperate climate on BMR
View the documentAdaptation and energy requirements
View the documentTotal energy expenditure (TEE) and physical activity levels (PAL) in adults: doubly-labelled water data
View the documentReferences
close this folderEnergy requirements of infants
View the document(introductory text...)
View the documentEnergy requirements of infants based on energy intake
View the documentCompilation of energy intakes published before and after 1980
View the documentTotal energy expenditure of infants
View the documentEnergy requirement for growth
View the documentEnergy requirements of infants predicted from total energy expenditure and growth
View the documentRecommendations
View the documentReferences
View the documentDiscussion
close this folderEnergy requirements and dietary energy recommendations for children and adolescents 1 to 18 years old
View the document(introductory text...)
View the documentIntroduction
View the documentTotal daily energy expenditure (TEE)
View the documentEstimates of basal metabolic rate to calculate total energy expenditure
View the documentTime allocation to different activities
View the documentPhysical activity levels of children and adolescents
View the documentDietary energy intake
View the documentGeneral conclusions and recommendations
View the documentReferences
View the documentDiscussion
close this folderEnergy requirements of pregnant and lactating women
View the document(introductory text...)
View the documentIntroduction
View the documentPregnancy
View the documentRecommendations for pregnancy
View the documentLactation
View the documentRecommendations for lactation
View the documentReferences
View the documentDiscussion
View the documentReferences
close this folderEnergy requirements of older individuals
View the document(introductory text...)
View the documentIntroduction
View the documentMethodology for determination of total energy expenditure
View the documentTotal energy expenditure of older individuals
View the documentRelationship between total energy expenditure and physical activity
View the documentEffects of energy balance on nitrogen balance
View the documentSummary of energy requirements in older individuals and recommendations for future research
View the documentReferences
View the documentDiscussion
close this folderProtein requirements of infants and children
View the document(introductory text...)
View the document1. Introduction
View the document2. Protein requirements of infants
View the document3. Protein requirements of children and adolescents
View the document4. Protein needs during catch-up growth
View the document5. protein needs associated with infection
View the document6. Assessment of protein quality of weaning diets
View the document7. Future research needs
View the documentReferences
View the documentDiscussion
View the documentReferences
close this folderThe requirements of adult man for indispensable amino acids
View the document(introductory text...)
View the document1. Introduction
View the document2. The problem in defining requirements
View the document3. Protein quality
View the document4. The maintenance requirement (MR)
View the document5.Diurnal cycling: the Millward-Rivers model
View the document6. Theoretical basis of the MIT tracer balance studies
View the document7. Technical problems of tracer balance studies
View the document8. Results of the MIT tracer balance studies
View the document9. Relation between leucine oxidation and nitrogen excretion
View the document10. Factors relating to the design of tracer balance experiments
View the document11. Breakpoint analysis
View the document12. Effect of protein/amino acid intake on protein synthesis and breakdown
View the document13. The colon: losses or gains?
View the document14. Conclusion
View the documentReferences
View the documentDiscussion
View the documentReferences
close this folderProtein requirements of elderly people
View the document(introductory text...)
View the documentIntroduction: current dietary protein requirement recommendations
View the documentProtein requirement studies in elderly people: previously reviewed data
View the documentProtein requirement studies in elderly people: reassessment of previously reviewed data
View the documentSummary
View the documentReferences
View the documentDiscussion
View the documentReferences
close this folderReport of the working group on general principles of assessing energy requirements
View the document(introductory text...)
View the documentGeneral recommendations
View the documentResearch needs
close this folderReport of the working group on energy requirements of infants, children and adolescents
View the document(introductory text...)
View the documentGeneral principles
View the documentInfants
View the documentChildren and adolescents
View the documentMethodological considerations
close this folderReport of the working group on energy requirements for pregnancy and lactation
View the document(introductory text...)
View the documentPregnancy
View the documentLactation
close this folderReport of the working group on energy requirements of older individuals
View the document(introductory text...)
View the documentGeneral statement
View the documentRecommendations on requirements
View the documentRecommendations for future research
close this folderReport of the working group on protein and amino acid requirements
View the document(introductory text...)
View the documentInfants
View the documentInfection and catch-up growth
View the documentChildren and adolescents
View the documentAdults
View the documentElderly
View the documentResearch needs: Infants and children
View the documentResearch needs: adults
close this folderAppendix Criteria for valid nitrogen balance measurement of protein requirements
View the document(introductory text...)
View the documentLong-term studies
View the documentAnalysis of multilevel short-term balance studies
View the documentReferences

Discussion

Atwater factors indicate the average amount of energy yielded by one gram of ingested carbohydrate, fat or protein; they are used in the calculation of the metabolizable energy content of foods, for instance in food composition tables and in infant formulas. Atwater (as well as Durnin and Southgate after him) derived them from the heat of combustion, corrected for energy losses in the form of unabsorbed nutrients in feces and urine of adults. The question was raised whether the same factors were also applicable to infants. The answer to this question does not affect energy requirements per se but becomes important in a discussion of recommended dietary intakes. Several factors may influence the metabolizable energy derived from food: (1) the chemical form of the macronutrient in the food, (2) the coefficient of digestibility; (3) the extent to which the nutrients are not completely oxidized, but stored in the body; (4) gut maturation and (5) age. In growing infants nitrogen retention will be higher. Preterm infants absorb less fat than term infants, and fat is generally less well absorbed by newborn infants than by older infants. Fat digestibility is also highly dependent upon the fat source and its processing, e.g. butterfat is poorly absorbed, whereas a mixture of vegetable oils is absorbed nearly to the same extent as human milk. In a study of 10 breast-fed infants fed unpasteurized milk, Southgate found that metabolizable energy averaged 92%. Application of the Atwater factors to human milk components indicated 96% metabolizable energy. Using Atwater factors in normal infants, therefore, does not seem to entail great errors. Application of the Atwater factors in preterm or sick infants may overestimate energy availability.

In young infants the energy content of human milk is of particular importance. Since it is very variable throughout days and feeds and there is no generally agreed upon, standard method for obtaining representative milk samples and for estimating their energy density, published figures vary considerably. Butte et al, using different methods, obtained values between 0.65 and 0.67, whereas values from Sweden (0.72) and a WHO study in Hungary are considerably higher (Waterlow). In the first two figures of her paper, Butte used energy intakes as reported. Dewey pointed out that differences in fat secretion in breast milk between groups of women had been observed, even when exactly the same methods were used. Maternal body fat can affect milk fat (Prentice), as can fat intake in lean women (Dewey). Since pasteurization alters the fat, it is important to note whether pasteurized or non pasteurized milk is used. In the end, the prevailing opinion was that Dewey and Butte had made the most rigorous assessments and that their values should therefore be relied upon primarily.

Several participants were intrigued by the low level of the first two data points in the line representing energy requirements derived from TEE and growth in Butte's figures 7 and 8. Most likely this is an artifact due to an underestimate of the cost of growth in these first two time periods.

Should recommendations be the same or different for breast- and bottle-fed infants? Reeds argued that requirements and intakes should not be confused. Requirements are to be seen as a function of the organism and not of the diet, whereas recommended dietary allowances are a function of the diet and the degree to which it meets requirements. Dewey pointed out that in practice the picture was less clear and the feeding mode seemed to affect physiology. Energy expenditure is lower in breast-fed infants or, in other words, formula-fed infants appear to require more energy than breast-fed ones. These differences are most marked between 3 and 6 months of age; then they gradually disappear, probably as a consequence of the phasing out of pure breast-feeding. Butte tried to derive energy requirements from data of a mixed group of infants, 50% breast- and 50% formula-fed. Dewey advocated separate recommendations for the two feeding groups in order to avoid the :impression that breast-fed infants do not get enough energy and ought to be supplemented or the risk that formula fed infants will not get enough energy to cover their needs. Giving a wide range of requirements does not appear to be a satisfactory solution either.

Butte et al tried to determine how much of a difference in diet-induced thermogenesis (DIT) there was between breast- and formula-fed infants. During the first 4h after the meal, DIT appeared slightly lower in breast-fed infants, but the difference was not statistically significant.

Waterlow queried the validity of 42% for the energetic efficiency of protein synthesis (Table 5, footnote d), and suggested that a figure of 75% would be more in accordance with the evidence.

Do infants growing up in the more stressful environment of developing countries or urban slums have the same or higher energy requirements than infants in industrialized countries? The little information that exists on this issue shows smaller differences than expected. Total energy expenditure (TEE), expressed as kcal/kg, was for instance very similar in infants from The Gambia and the UK (Prentice). Butte compared TEE of small groups (n = 20) of 4-month-old infants from Mexico and Houston. In. Mexico it was 74 kcal/kg, in Houston 64 and 73 kcal/kg for breast- and bottle-fed infants, respectively. Several participants felt that more information was needed to decide the extent to which frequent infections and desirable catch-up growth add to energy requirements in poor environments.