
| Bioconversion of Organic Residues for Rural Communities (UNU, 1979) |
| From the charter of the United Nations University |
| Foreword |
| Perspectives on bioconversion of organic residues for rural communities |
![]() | (introductory text...) |
![]() | Introduction |
![]() | Sources of available nutrients |
![]() | The most suitable materials for bioconversion |
![]() | Characteristics of residues |
![]() | Bioconversion systems |
![]() | Physical and chemical treatments |
![]() | Microbial conversion |
![]() | The animal conversion phase |
![]() | Summary |
![]() | References |
| Availability of organic residues as a rural resource |
![]() | (introductory text...) |
![]() | Discussion summary: Papers by van der Wal and Barreveld |
| Micro-organisms as tools for rural processing of organic residues |
![]() | (introductory text...) |
![]() | Introduction |
![]() | Microbial utilization of mono- and di-saccharide residues |
![]() | Microbial conversion of starchy residues |
![]() | Microbial conversion of complex mixtures of compounds (Polysaccharides, Proteins, Lipids, etc.) |
![]() | Microbial utilization of cellulose and ligno-cellulose residues |
![]() | Algal culture as a source of biomass |
![]() | Microbial utilization of silviculture biomass |
![]() | Micro-organisms and marine and freshwater biomass |
![]() | International studies on processing organic residues |
![]() | References |
| Production of feed as an objective for bioconversion systems |
![]() | (introductory text...) |
![]() | Introduction |
![]() | General characteristics |
![]() | Manure as feed |
![]() | Sewage-grown micro-algae |
![]() | Conclusion |
![]() | References |
| Environmental goals for microbial bioconversion in rural communities |
![]() | (introductory text...) |
![]() | Introduction |
![]() | Health and water economy |
![]() | Fertilizer and energy economy |
![]() | Concluding remarks |
![]() | References |
![]() | Discussion summary: Papers by Porter, Berk and La Rivière |
| Strategies for developing small-scale fermentation processes in developing countries |
![]() | (introductory text...) |
![]() | References |
![]() | Discussion summary |
| Production of microbial protein foods on edible substrates, food by-products, and ligno-cellulosic wastes |
![]() | (introductory text...) |
![]() | Preface |
![]() | Introduction |
![]() | Contributions to the solution of nutritional problems |
![]() | Development of protein-rich vegetarian meat substitutes in the western world |
![]() | References |
![]() | Discussion summary |
| The role of ruminants in the bioconversion of tropical byproducts and wastes into food and fuel |
![]() | (introductory text...) |
![]() | Introduction |
![]() | Nutritional limitations in the use of tropical by-products and waste |
![]() | Practical experience with tropical by-products and wastes as feed for ruminants |
![]() | An integrated system for converting tropical feeds and byproducts into milk, beef, and fuel |
![]() | References |
![]() | Discussion summary |
| Possible applications of enzyme technology in rural areas |
![]() | (introductory text...) |
![]() | Introduction |
![]() | Biocatalytic processes |
![]() | Enzyme hydrolysis of manioc |
![]() | Whole cell systems |
![]() | Cellulose degradation and utilization |
![]() | Transfer of enzyme technology to rural communities |
![]() | Conclusions |
![]() | References |
![]() | Discussion summary |
| Indian experience with treated straw as feed |
![]() | (introductory text...) |
![]() | Introduction |
![]() | Experience with straw treatment |
![]() | Field testing and demonstration of straw treatment |
![]() | General considerations |
![]() | Summary |
![]() | Annex 1. The energy efficiency of the two-stage, feed-fuel processing of straw in indian villages |
![]() | Annex 2. Method of calculating the value presented in table 2 for the efficiency of naoh energy usage |
![]() | Annex 3. Recommendations to farmers on the treatment of straw |
![]() | Annex 4. Calculated efficiency of milk production by straw-fed village buffaloes |
![]() | References |
![]() | Discussion summary |
| Indian experience with algal ponds |
![]() | (introductory text...) |
![]() | Introduction |
![]() | Cultivation of algae in wastes for feed |
![]() | Problems of contamination |
![]() | Cultivation of algae for biofertilizer |
![]() | References |
![]() | Acknowledgements |
![]() | Discussion summary |
| Organic residues in aquaculture |
![]() | (introductory text...) |
![]() | Introduction |
![]() | The range of production in aquaculture |
![]() | The value of organic wastes |
![]() | Direct feeding |
![]() | Concluding remarks |
![]() | References |
![]() | Discussion summary |
| Biogas generation: developments. Problems, and tasks - an overview |
![]() | (introductory text...) |
![]() | Introduction |
![]() | What is biogas? |
![]() | Microbiology of CH4, or bio-methanogenesis |
![]() | The biogas plant-some technical considerations |
![]() | Environmental and operational considerations |
![]() | Developments and processes for rural areas |
![]() | Cost-benefit analyses |
![]() | Health hazards |
![]() | Bottlenecks, considerations, and research and development |
![]() | References |
![]() | Discussion summary |
| Mushroom production technology for rural development |
![]() | (introductory text...) |
![]() | Materials and methods for growing mushrooms under natural or field conditions |
![]() | Growing mushrooms under semicontrolled conditions |
![]() | Results and discussion |
![]() | References |
![]() | Discussion summary |
| The combination of algal and anaerobic waste treatment in a bioregenerative farm system |
![]() | (introductory text...) |
![]() | Introduction |
![]() | Algae production on organic wastes |
![]() | The bioregenerative farm |
![]() | References |
![]() | Discussion summary |
| A continuous composting system for disposal and utilization of animal wastes at the village level |
![]() | (introductory text...) |
![]() | Status of land utilization and disposal of animal wastes |
![]() | A continuous composting system for land utilization of animal wastes at the village level |
![]() | References |
| Bioconversion of fruit and vegetable wastes |
![]() | (introductory text...) |
![]() | State of the art of bioconversion |
![]() | Technical transfer |
| Integrated research on agricultural waste reclamation |
![]() | (introductory text...) |
![]() | Introduction |
![]() | Production of yeast from soybean cooking waste at miso factories |
![]() | Application of soy waste as koji substrate for rice miso manufacturing (5, 6) |
![]() | Conclusion |
![]() | References |
![]() | Discussion summary |
| Solid state fermentation of starchy substrates |
![]() | (introductory text...) |
![]() | Introduction |
![]() | Materials and methods |
![]() | Agro-economic perspectives |
![]() | Summary |
![]() | References |
![]() | Discussion summary |
| Production of single-cell protein from cellulose |
![]() | (introductory text...) |
![]() | Introduction |
![]() | Experimental results |
![]() | Discussion |
![]() | Summary |
![]() | References |
![]() | Acknowledgements |
![]() | Discussion summary |
| Analysis of energy cost of integrated systems |
![]() | (introductory text...) |
![]() | Energy cost and energy requirement |
![]() | Why energy analysis? |
![]() | Net energy intensity |
![]() | What criteria are offered by energy analysis? |
![]() | Conclusion |
![]() | References |
| Analysis of bioconversion systems at the village level |
![]() | (introductory text...) |
![]() | Introduction |
![]() | Approach to bioconversion analysis |
![]() | Some results and costs from integrated systems |
![]() | Future development possibilities |
![]() | Conclusions |
![]() | Summary |
![]() | References |
| Nutritional evaluation of bioconversion products for farm animals |
![]() | (introductory text...) |
![]() | Introduction |
![]() | Testing procedures for determination of nutritional value |
| Bioconversion products: toxicology - problems and potential |
![]() | (introductory text...) |
![]() | Summary |
![]() | References |
| Nutritional evaluation in humans |
![]() | (introductory text...) |
![]() | Introduction |
![]() | Evaluation of products of bioconversion for human consumption |
![]() | Procedures for nutritional evaluation in humans |
![]() | The evaluation of various food products |
![]() | Concept of productivity |
![]() | Conclusions |
![]() | References |
![]() | Discussion summary: Papers by van Weerden, Shacklady, and Bressani |
| Biomass from organic residues for animal and human feeding |
![]() | (introductory text...) |
![]() | References |
![]() | Discussion summary |
| Appropriate biotechnology - summary remarks |
![]() | (introductory text...) |
![]() | References |
| Other UNU Publications |
![]() | (introductory text...) |
![]() | Books |
Having identified the nutritional constraints associated with the use of tropical byproducts, it becomes possible to plan efficient systems for converting these into animal products such as beef and milk. This task also has been facilitated considerably by the recent findings that both by-pass protein and desired roughage characteristics can be provided by such protein-rich tropical forages as the legume shrub Leucaena leucocephala, the leaves of the banana plant, and the aerial forage part of the sweet potato (2, 13, 14). Cassava forage is also effective with one specific tropical by-product, namely molasses (15).
The likely input-output relationships involved in a rural bioconversion unit using cattle can be appreciated from the data in Table 4. It is assumed that a single family unit has 1.5 ha of land and that it will derive its disposable income from the sale of bananas, milk or cheese, and beef. The cattle population comprises five adult cows, four calves, and four steers/heifers. The cattle are confined throughout the year in an open-side building fitted with a partially slatted floor so that the faeces and urine fall directly into a channel below the floor, which, in turn, connects with the inlet of a biogas digester. After partial digestion, the final effluent is pumped onto the crops as a fertilizer (see Figure 4). The same equipment is used to apply irrigation water. The biogas produced from the unit (about 5.7 m³/day) is calculated to be sufficient to provide for cooking in the house and to drive the irrigation/effluent pump and forage chopper.


The cattle are fed a mixture of sugar-cane (high biomass per unit area), and banana forage - i.e., the residue after harvesting the fruit, as the energy source, and sweet potato forage for by-pass protein. No roots are harvested and the plant is managed as a perennial. Some additional nonprotein nitrogen such as urea, and phosphorus-rich minerals and salt are purchased; these are the only imports into the unit. Both the banana forage and sweet potato forage provide desirable roughage characteristics.
The advantages of this particular system are that it:
a. provides a good level of disposable income for the family;
b. is likely to be in energy balance (except for the energy cost of the urea and minerals);
c. avoids erosion by using perennial forages and by recycling organic matter;
d. relies to a minimum on imported fertilizer, yet represents a high level of plant nutrient application because of recycling;
e. reduces environmental contamination; and
f. uses a minimum of land area (1.5 ha), yet produces both a cash crop and animal products.