
| Environment, Biodiversity and Agricultural Change in West Africa (UNU, 1997, 141 pages) |
| The context |
![]() | 4: Criteria for designing sustainable farming systems in tropical Africa |
The overall objective of agricultural or farming system design and management is the creation of environmental conditions that remain favourable for crop and animal production or even increase their productivity in perpetuity while at the same time minimizing adverse impacts on the resource base or, where possible, enhancing it. Consequently, it is necessary in any effort at designing sustainable farming systems to begin with:
In addition to the various causes of unsustainability indicated in figure 4.1, or the characteristics of resources and inputs which may, in association with certain practices cause unsustainability for which remedies are given (table 4.2), there are overall general issues that need to be taken into account in designing sustainable agricultural systems. These include:
Table 4.2 Selected Sustainable Agriculture Resource Input Features and Practices, Effects and Remedies
| Resource characteristic | Practice or factor contributing to unsustainability | Ameliorating or restoration technology or practice |
| 1. Land tenure | Lack of security of tenure | Secure land permanently or for period that commodity is in field |
| 2. Land use | Absence of plan or agreement on plan | Start as early as possible to get authorities thinking of and evolving plan |
| Land in dispute | Early settlement before use, especially for perennial crops | |
| 3. Vegetation management | Use of heavy mechanical equipment | Selective mechanization, e.g. use of shear blade and partially mechanized clearing; avoid very heavy equipment |
| Avoid burning large amount of dry biomass for long periods at high temperatures | ||
| Overgrazing | Relate stocking rate to pasture condition; use rotational grazing and fence partitioning | |
| Relate all land use to the capability | ||
| 4. Soils: | ||
| (a) Structural damage or decline | Fire pasture | Early burning of limited dry biomass |
| Excessive or mechanical cultivation | Develop appropriate fire management for specific land use requirement | |
| Fallowing and bare soil; overgrazing and loss of cover; machinery and animal traffic | Ensure adequate cover by vegetation or mulch | |
| Rotational grazing and cover management | ||
| Relate tillage and stocking rate to pasture condition and soil type | ||
| (b) Acidification nutrient loss | No lime used on acid soil; use of acidifying fertilizers | Lime application if possible and |
| Use most appropriate recommendations | ||
| Use of resistant or acid tolerant varieties | ||
| (c) Erosion | Removal of vegetation cover and exposure of soil | Retention of vegetation cover by stocking adjustment, good pasture and/or wildlife management, stubble mulch - rough surface retention |
| Overgrazing | ||
| Degradation resulting from poor cultivation technique | Use of reduced or minimal tillage, deep ripping, pasture rotation and measures to rejuvenate fragile soil | |
| Use of wind-breaks and alley cropping | ||
| Adoption of land use that is not compatible or does not match capability of land | Improvement of capability assessment and better matching of use to it | |
| 5. Fire management | Uncontrolled use of fire in clearing, hunting, pasture management, etc. | Controlled use of fire; early burning in pasture management and to maintain desired species composition |
| 6. Water quality | Inadequate drainage, waste and effluent water disposal | Improved engineering works to carry drainage water and effluent from animal housing; provision of sanitary inspection to enforce laws |
| Contamination of surface and groundwater by fertilizer and pesticides | This is not of common occurrence and is limited to a few large-scale "modern" farms | |
| Care in use of pesticides near open water | ||
| Measures to minimize access of chemicals to groundwater | ||
| Use suitable fertilizer type and method of application to increase uptake | ||
| Apply fertilizer in amounts needed by crops as determined by analysis | ||
| Sediment and salt run-off into surface water | Better management to minimize soil erosion and salinity | |
| 7. Soil salinity, water- logging (irrigated agriculture) | Inefficient/excessive water use by flooding, too frequent irrigation, low infiltration | Improved water scheduling |
| Conjunctive reuse of groundwater | ||
| Drainage and gypsum to improve infiltration | ||
| Inadequate/deteriorating infrastructure | Improved water distribution networks | |
| Poor site selection for irrigation areas | Soil selection should be consistent with soil and land capability | |
| 8. Soil salinity (dryland) | Excessive clearing of deep-rooted perennials causing rise in groundwater levels | Identification and revegetation of recharge areas |
| Strategic tree and shrub planting/management | ||
| Use of deep rooted perennials wherever possible | ||
| 9. Use of monoculture crops | Reliance on a single crop without rotation or use of row crops | Better to use tested and row rotations |
| Use mixed crop sequences rather than just row sole crops | ||
| 10. Pesticide residues resistance | Overreliance and persistent use of pesticides | Use of integrated pest and management |
| Overreliance on chemical control of crop weeds | Biological control of pests | |
| Selection of genetically resistant species | ||
| Low pesticide use farming | ||
| Use of biodegradable pesticides | ||
| Use of rotations to reduce pest, weed or pathogen infestation | ||
Sources: Adapted from SCA (1991) and Lal and Okigbo (1990).
Table 4.3 Yield in Gram Equivalents and Percentage of Crop Land for Various Levels of Production Inputs in the World
| Farming system or technology input level | Yield t/ha | Crop land (%) | Average area of arable land needed (ha/caput) |
| Shifting cultivation | <0.1 | 2 | 2.6 |
| Low traditional | 0.8 | 28 | 1.2 |
| Moderate traditional | 1.2 | 35 | 0.6 |
| Improved traditional | 2 | 10 | 0.17 |
| Moderate technological | 3 | 10 | 0.11 |
| High technological | 5 | 10 | 0.08 |
| Specialized technological | 7 | 5 | 0.05 |
Source: FAO (1991b).