Cover Image
close this bookCauses and Consequences of Intrauterine Growth Retardation, Proceedings of an IDECG workshop, November 1996, Baton Rouge, USA, Supplement of the European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (International Dietary Energy Consultative Group - IDECG, 1996, 100 pages)
View the document(introductory text...)
View the documentStockton
View the documentEuropean journal of clinical nutrition
View the documentForeword
close this folderCurrent growth standards, definitions, diagnosis and classification of fetal growth retardation
View the document(introductory text...)
View the documentDefinitions
View the documentDiagnosis and misclassification
View the documentGrowth-charts
View the documentUltrasonography dating
View the documentStandardization of growth charts
View the documentSymmetric versus asymmetric growth retardation
View the documentGenetic factors
View the documentConclusion
View the documentReferences
View the documentDiscussion
close this folderLevels and patterns of intrauterine growth retardation in developing countries
View the document(introductory text...)
View the documentIntroduction
View the documentMethodology
View the documentResults
View the documentDiscussion
View the documentReferences
View the documentDiscussion
close this folderBirth weights and stillbirths in historical perspective
View the document(introductory text...)
View the documentIntroduction
View the documentSources of evidence
View the documentResults
View the documentDiscussion
View the documentConcluding remarks
View the documentReferences
View the documentDiscussion
close this folderBiological mechanisms of environmentally induced causes of IUGR
View the document(introductory text...)
View the documentIntroduction
View the documentBiomedical mechanisms
View the documentHormonal regulation of fetal growth
View the documentNutrition and placental functions
View the documentMaternal environment
View the documentMaternal disorders
View the documentMaternal nutrition and iugr
View the documentInteraction factors
View the documentReferences
View the documentDiscussion
View the documentReference
close this folderSocioeconomic determinants of intrauterine growth retardation
View the document(introductory text...)
View the documentIntroduction
View the documentSocioeconomic disparities in IUGR: Mediating factors
View the documentSecular trends in IUGR and its determinants
View the documentAre there residual socioeconomic disparities in IUGR?
View the documentReferences
View the documentDiscussion
close this folderEffects of intrauterine growth retardation on mortality morbidity in infants and young children
View the document(introductory text...)
View the documentIntroduction
View the documentDefinitions used
View the documentTypes of IUGR
View the documentAssociation of low birth weight with diarrhoea
View the documentAssociation of low birth weight with respiratory infections
View the documentDifferential effects in stunted vs wasted IUGR infants
View the documentDiscussion
View the documentReferences
View the documentDiscussion
close this folderIntrauterine growth retardation, body size, body composition and physical performance in adolescence
View the document(introductory text...)
View the documentIntroduction
View the documentLiterature review
View the documentINCAP longitudinal study (1969-77) and its follow-up study (1988-89)
View the documentReferences
View the documentDiscussion
close this folderNeurodevelopmental outcome of small-for-gestational-age infants
View the document(introductory text...)
View the documentProblems of definition and interpretation
View the documentCerebral palsy
View the documentMinimal neurologic dysfunction
View the documentSensory loss or handicap
View the documentConclusions
View the documentReferences
View the documentDiscussion
close this folderSmall for gestational age, term babies, in the first six years of life
View the document(introductory text...)
View the documentSamples
View the documentSocio-economic backgrounds
View the documentStudies in the first two years
View the documentBrazilian study
View the documentStudies of children from two to seven years
View the documentComments on studies
View the documentImplications
View the documentReferences
View the documentDiscussion
close this folderEffects of intrauterine growth retardation on mental performance and behavior, outcomes during adolescence and adulthood
View the document(introductory text...)
View the documentSchool age outcomes of young adolescents with intrauterine growth failure (Table 1)
View the documentLate adolescent and adult outcomes of low birthweight and intrauterine growth failure
View the documentEffects of IUGR on the development of very low birthweight children
View the documentDiscussion and conclusion
View the documentReferences
View the documentDiscussion
close this folderFetal growth and adult disease
View the document(introductory text...)
View the document1. Evidence for fetal origins of adult disease
View the document2. Discussion
View the documentReferences
View the documentCommentary
View the documentReferences
View the documentDiscussion
close this folderNutritional interventions to prevent intrauterine growth retardation: Evidence from randomized controlled trials
View the document(introductory text...)
View the documentIntroduction
View the documentResults
View the documentDiscussion
View the documentConclusions
View the documentAnnex: Systematic reviews included
View the documentReferences
View the documentDiscussion
close this folderReport of the IDECG group on definitions, classifications, causes, mechanisms and prevention of IUGR
View the document(introductory text...)
View the documentDefinitions and classifications
View the documentCauses and mechanisms
View the documentPrevention
close this folderReport of the IDECG group on effects of IUGR on infants, children and adolescents: Immunocompetence, mortality, morbidity, body size, body composition, and physical performance
View the document(introductory text...)
View the documentImmunocompetence
View the documentMortality and morbidity
View the documentBody size, composition and physical performance
View the documentMaturation
View the documentPolicy implications
View the documentResearch needs
close this folderReport of the IDECG/IUNS working group on IUGR effects on neurological, sensory, cognitive, and behavioral function
View the document(introductory text...)
View the documentLimitations of available evidence
View the documentGeneralizations
View the documentNeurologic and sensory outcomes
View the documentCognition
View the documentResearch needs
View the documentRecommendations
close this folderReport of the IDECG group on variation in fetal growth and adult disease
View the document(introductory text...)
View the documentCurrent state of knowledge
View the documentSpecific hypotheses and possible mechanisms
View the documentImplications for future research
View the documentImplications for public health

Cerebral palsy

Cerebral palsy is found in 1 to 2 per 1000 children. It has been well known for nearly 150 years that low birthweight infants are at greater risk for this outcome than more average size infants are. However, it has only been in the last 40 years that a relatively clear distinction has been made between babies born preterm and those born small for gestational age, whether born at term or preterm. As emphasized above, the boundaries between SGA and AGA are not well defined, and have shifted over time. The incidence of cerebral palsy is highly dependent on gestational age at birth, ranging from as high as 250/1000 for infants born at 23 or 24 weeks to 30/1000 at 30 weeks, to 5/1000 at 36 weeks, to 1/1000 for infants born at 40 weeks (Escobar et al, 1991). It is therefore important to define the impact of SGA on cerebral palsy against this background. In doing so, it becomes very obvious that evaluating the relationship between SGA and cerebral palsy in term infants requires huge sample sizes and the answer is not likely to be elucidated by relatively small prospective cohort studies.

We should also emphasize that the composition of the preterm population is changing, especially as more and more very low birthweight infants are surviving. In addition, the preterm population consists of infants that are not only preterm, but SGA as well. The outcome for these latter infants may be different than for infants who are only preterm.

Despite these considerations, review of the available data regarding the relationship between SGA and cerebral palsy does allow us to reach some conclusions. As an example, babies born at term and later diagnosed with cerebral palsy tend to be lighter at birth than those who are not diagnosed as having cerebral palsy (Ellenberg and Nelson, 1979; Blair and Stanley, 1990). Nevertheless, most small babies, even if they are very SGA, do not end up with cerebral palsy, and most children with cerebral palsy are of normal birthweight. Translated into a measure of risk, being SGA at term appears to double or triple the risk of cerebral palsy, i.e. from 1 or 2 per 1000 live births to 2 to 6 per 1000 live births. Factors that appear to be associated with increased risk are the severity of the SGA, male sex, and whether asphyxia or other risk factors for cerebral palsy were present.

In many studies of preterm infants and cerebral palsy, preterm SGA infants appear to have less cerebral palsy than AGA preterm infants (Hack et al, 1989; Robertson et al, 1990; Saigal et al, 1990; Sung et al, 1993). These SGA preterm infants are frequently born in conjunction with maternal preeclampsia, and most studies suggest a protective effect against cerebral palsy of preeclampsia in preterm SGA infants. However, even this conclusion is not unanimous. Robertson et al (1990), for example, studying £1500 g, less than tenth percentile infants, found that preterm SGA infants were not at greater risk to be disabled with cerebral palsy than were AGA birthweight or gestational age matched controls, but all were at substantially greater risk than a term AGA comparison group. On the other hand, Hack et al (1989), studying £ 1500 g infants, observed an 8% rate of cerebral palsy in the AGA group, but only a 3% rate (p <.01) in the SGA group. Veelken et al, also showed that < 1500 g SGA infants had less cerebral palsy than < 1500 g preterm AGA infants (Veelken et al, 1992). We interpret these data to indicate that in cohorts defined by birthweight, SGA infants have less cerebral palsy. However, in cohorts defined by gestational age, SGA infants had similar or higher rates of cerebral palsy.