
| Community-directed Treatment of Lymphatic Filariasis in Africa - Report of a multi-centre study in Ghana and Kenya (UNDP - WB - WHO, 2000, 44 p.) |
| (introduction...) |
| INVESTIGATORS |
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
| EXECUTIVE SUMMARY |
| INTRODUCTION |
| STUDY DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY |
![]() | Purpose of the study |
![]() | Objectives |
![]() | Overall study design |
![]() | Study Units and Sampling |
![]() | Evaluation |
| STUDY AREAS AND HEALTH |
![]() | Study areas |
![]() | Health and political structure |
![]() | Situation analysis of the health system, the communities and their interaction |
![]() | Main findings |
| DESCRIPTION OF THE TWO DRUG DELIVERY METHODS |
![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | Mass-treatment by the Health Care System (HST) |
![]() | Community-Directed Treatment through the Health Care System (ComDT/HS) |
| IMPLEMENTATION OF TWO DRUG DELIVERY METHODS |
![]() | Mass treatment by the Health Care System (HST) |
![]() | Community-Directed Treatment through the Health Care System (ComDT/HS) |
| AWARENESS OF DRUG DISTRIBUTION AND ITS PURPOSE |
![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | Awareness of drug distribution |
![]() | Understanding the purpose of Mass Drug Administration |
| TREATMENT COVERAGE BY THE TWO METHODS |
![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | Characteristics of respondents |
![]() | Treatment coverage |
| REASONS FOR BETTER PERFORMANCE OF ComDT |
![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | Community involvement |
![]() | Timing of the distribution and place of abode of distributor |
![]() | Number of distributors |
![]() | Commitment of those distributing |
![]() | Internal checks within the community |
![]() | Socio-political set up |
![]() | Satisfaction with ComDT |
| CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS |
![]() | Main conclusions |
![]() | Recommendations |