Cover Image
close this bookAid and Entrepreneurship in Tanzania (Dar Es Salaam University Press, 1993, 165 p.)
close this folderVI NORAD'S MANAGEMENT CAPACITY IN TANZANIA
View the documentNORAD's qualifications and efficiency
View the documentNORAD's responsiveness to Tanzanian demands
View the documentReceiver orientation
View the documentReceiver orientation evaluated across institutional arenas
View the documentNORAD's influence on the Tanzanian government
View the documentNORAD: control-oriented

Receiver orientation

If we consider the six variables in Table 13 together, are the Tanzanians or Norwegians most positive to NORAD's responsiveness to Tanzanian demands and interests? Given that we define the six dimensions as aspects of a "receiver orientation" (RO), an orientation consistent with scoring positively on the six dimensions, we can compute a receiver orientation index (RO index) by adding the values given to the responses on the six questions and finding the mean response value. The classification gave increasing values from "very good" (1) to "very poor" (4), (see question 44 in the questionnaire). Thus the higher the score the lower the evaluation of the receiver orientation of the aid.

Table 14. Receiver orientation, Tanzanian and Norwegian evaluations


Scores



Norwegians

Tanzanians

1.

N=

14

35

2.

Sum of scores

181

385

3.

Possible nos. of answers

84

210

4.

Questions not answered

3

28

5.

Actual answers

81

182

6.

Receiver orient. index

2.23

2.12

The RO index is the sum of scores (2) divided by actual number of answers (5). Thus, the index (6) defines the mean score given by the respondent over all six dimensions. The difference between the indexes is small (0.11) but significant because of the large number of individual scores. The index repeats, in more precise terms, that the Tanzanian aid administrators have a somewhat more positive view of NORAD's responsiveness to Tanzanian demands than do the Norwegians.