
| Eco-restructuring: Implications for Sustainable Development (UNU, 1998, 417 p.) |
| (introduction...) |
| 1. Eco-restructuring: The transition to an ecologically sustainable economy |
![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | Introduction: On sustainability |
![]() | The need for holistic systems analysis |
![]() | Environmental threats and (un)sustainability indicators |
![]() | Sharpening the debate |
![]() | Non-controversial issues: Population, resources, and technology |
![]() | Controversial issues: Pollution, productivity, and biospheric stability |
![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | On toxicity |
![]() | The stability of the biosphere: The impossibility of computing the odds |
![]() | Technical preconditions for sustainability |
![]() | Finding the least-cost (least-pain) path |
![]() | Concluding comments |
![]() | Notes |
![]() | References |
| Part I: Restructuring resource use |
![]() | 2. The biophysical basis of eco-restructuring: An overview of current relations between human economic activities and the global system |
![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | Introduction |
![]() | The earth system |
![]() | The climate system and climatic change |
![]() | Climatic change and vulnerability |
![]() | Biological diversity |
![]() | Fresh water |
![]() | Soils |
![]() | The solid earth (lithosphere) |
![]() | Land-cover and land-use changes |
![]() | Human impacts and industrial metabolism |
![]() | The case of West Africa |
![]() | Outlook |
![]() | 3. Ecological process engineering: The potential of bio-processing |
![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | Editor's note |
![]() | Introduction |
![]() | The current situation: The status of biotechnologies |
![]() | Potential and promises |
![]() | Market penetration by biotechnology |
![]() | Barriers to penetration |
![]() | Final remarks |
![]() | Notes |
![]() | References |
![]() | 4. Materials futures: Pollution prevention, recycling, and improved functionality |
![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | Editor's introduction |
![]() | Background |
![]() | Strategies to increase materials productivity |
![]() | Materials technology |
![]() | Material attributes |
![]() | Material performance trends |
![]() | Conclusions |
![]() | Notes |
![]() | References |
![]() | 5. Global energy futures: The long-term perspective for eco-restructuring |
![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | Introduction |
![]() | What is the energy system? |
![]() | Energy system inefficiencies |
![]() | The deep future energy system |
![]() | Transition and the rate of change of the energy system |
![]() | North-South disparity and sustainable energy systems |
![]() | Concluding remarks |
![]() | Notes |
![]() | References |
![]() | 6. Fuel decarbonization for fuel cell applications and sequestration of the separated CO2 |
![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | The challenge of stabilizing the atmosphere |
![]() | Flue gas decarbonization vs. fuel gas decarbonization |
![]() | Lifecycle CO2 emissions - without and with CO2 sequestration |
![]() | Options for sequestering CO2 |
![]() | Framing the cost analysis for CO2 sequestration |
![]() | Major findings of the sequestration cost analysis |
![]() | Appendix A: The importance of the water-gas shift reaction in fuel decarbonization |
![]() | Appendix B: Biomass CO2 emission offset potential in a world where some coal-rich regions cannot or will not reduce emissions |
![]() | Appendix C: Pipeline transport of hydrogen |
![]() | Acknowledgements |
![]() | Notes |
![]() | References |
![]() | 7. Photovoltaics |
![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | Introduction |
![]() | The technological potential of PV |
![]() | PV costs |
![]() | A PV market diffusion strategy |
![]() | Possible PV adoption and diffusion scenarios |
![]() | Concluding remarks: PV and eco-restructuring |
![]() | Notes |
![]() | Bibliography |
| Part II: Restructuring sectors and the sectoral balance of the economy |
![]() | 8. Global eco-restructuring and technological change in the twenty-first century |
![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | Globalization |
![]() | Population growth and economic growth |
![]() | Environmental pressures for global change |
![]() | Scenario analysis and the use of materials |
![]() | The challenge for eco-restructuring |
![]() | Concluding remarks |
![]() | Notes |
![]() | References |
![]() | 9. Agro-eco-restructuring: Potential for sustainability |
![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | Editor's note |
![]() | The broad situation |
![]() | Identifying the limiting factors |
![]() | The technological feasibility of sustainable agriculture |
![]() | The possible course towards sustainable change |
![]() | Final remarks |
![]() | Notes |
![]() | References |
![]() | 10. The restructuring of tropical land-use systems |
![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | Introduction |
![]() | Models of rural development |
![]() | The need for integrated solutions in tropical land use |
![]() | Strategic issues |
![]() | Concluding remarks |
![]() | Notes |
![]() | References |
![]() | 11. The restructuring of transport, logistics, trade, and industrial space use |
![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | Introduction |
![]() | The significance of freight transport |
![]() | Past growth and patterns of freight transport development |
![]() | Spatial and transport outcomes |
![]() | Future developments affecting freight volumes and patterns |
![]() | The scope for reducing freight volumes |
![]() | Taking up the potential |
![]() | Conclusion |
![]() | Notes |
![]() | References |
![]() | 12 National and international policy instruments and institutions for eco-restructuring |
![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | Introduction |
![]() | Building on small agreements |
![]() | Economic policy instruments and mechanisms |
![]() | International distributional implications |
![]() | A precondition for social breakthroughs in the context of developing societies |
![]() | Issues of science and technology for development |
![]() | A future united nations system |
![]() | References |
![]() | Contributors |
![]() | Other titles of interest |
Although it is not possible to specify in abstract which patterns of land use, trade, logistics, and transport would offer greatest scope for reducing environmental stresses, shifts toward sustainable societies and economies would most likely involve:
- less physical movement,- less emphasis on physical transportation infrastructures,
- substitution of information and capital flows for physical goods movement,
- greater mixing of land uses,
- less specialization and concentration in production,
- smaller-scale installations and use of flexible technologies to emphasize economies of scope over economies of scale,
- decentralization of production,
- greater reliance on local resources,
- greater serving of local markets,
- new networking arrangements among contractors/subcontractors,
- more sensitivity in matching activities and locations so as not to overreach local environmental capacities.
The flexibility for spatial and sectoral shifting - even within the framework set by the inertia of sunk costs and market contestability is considerable. However, the signs are not positive that these opportunities will automatically be taken up. Finding geographical and logistics arrangements that are less resource intensive and defining the market conditions under which these would be consistent with profit maximization is therefore a central concern for eco-restructuring. In this regard, spatial indicators could be important diagnostics in eco-restructuring processes. A reconfiguration of the market framework is necessary to provide the incentive/disincentive structure for change. Although it may not be politically possible in the short term to internalize all currently externalized social and environmental costs into environmental resource prices, it is important to begin that process soon and to target some sectors for early action. A combination of gradually increasing motorway tolls and fuel taxes, together with specific regulatory actions targeted at trucks and aimed at securing speed, loading, and environmental performance standards, would constitute an important start.
International agreement on a harmonized resource taxation system is unlikely. This implies that a way must be found to reconcile the need for individual countries or blocs to act independently to tax resource use without jeopardizing the competitiveness of their own industry in either domestic markets (vis-is imports) or in export markets (vis-is competing exporters). Maintaining a level playing field for international competition depends upon taxing imports on entry on the basis of their resource intensity and exempting exports from resource taxes using rebates, again based upon resource intensity. Such a solution would allow independent, incremental action by the lead countries. None the less, this would still depend first upon reforming the GATT agreement (Weaver 1995).
Because of interlinkages between freight transport and all other economic activities, actions targeted at freight transport (and at truck transport specifically) would have important knock-on effects. Together with the energy sector, transport is privileged in this respect. Against the backdrop of industrialized countries' obligations under the Framework Convention on Climate Change and responsibility to take the lead in eco-restructuring, the fact that transport energy use is increasing faster within these countries than within the developing world is salutary. It is indicative that this is a lifestyle issue - a reflection of conspicuous over-consumption in the context of distorted incentives. This makes it all the more important for policy to focus on freight transport. It is a critical and potential swing sector in eco-restructuring.
Acknowledgements
I am grateful to Gilberto Gallop Walther Manshard, Ray Hudson, and Michael Taylor for editorial comments on an earlier draft. Friedrich Schmidt-Bleek alerted me to relevant work at the Wuppertal Institute and Eric Britton to relevant work of EcoPlan International. Landis Gabel provided helpful information on deregulation, market liberalization, and freight transport. Thanks are due also to two anonymous reviewers whose suggestions for improvement were most helpful.