Cover Image
close this bookStormwater Drainage and Land Reclamation for Urban Development (HABITAT, 1991, 94 p.)
View the document(introduction...)
View the documentFOREWORD
close this folderINTRODUCTION
View the documentA. Background
View the documentB. Purpose of the report
View the documentC. Scope of the report
close this folderI. URBANIZATION AND THE DEMAND FOR URBAN LAND
View the documentA. Current trends in urban growth
View the documentB. Increases in land prices and the use of marginal land
View the documentC. Specific problems of the urban poor
View the documentD. Urban health in marginal settlements
View the documentE. Conclusions
close this folderII. POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF STORMWATER DRAINAGE AND LAND RECLAMATION PROJECTS
View the documentA. Urban land-use planning
View the documentB. Urban health
View the documentC. Socioeconomic benefits
close this folderIII. TECHNICAL OPTIONS FOR STORMWATER DRAINAGE AND LAND RECLAMATION
View the documentA. Stormwater management
View the documentB. Drainage system components
View the documentC. Storage: detention and retention
View the documentD. Drainage system design
View the documentE. Land reclamation options
View the documentF. Land stabilization
close this folderIV. MAINTENANCE
View the documentA. Maintenance objectives
View the documentB. The maintenance programme
View the documentC. Review of maintenance
View the documentD. Institutional arrangements for maintenance
close this folderV. PROJECT APPRAISAL
View the document(introduction...)
View the documentA. Technical appraisal
View the documentB. Social and health impact appraisal
View the documentC. Economic and financial appraisal
View the documentD. Institutional appraisal
View the documentVI. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
View the documentBIBLIOGRAPHY
close this folderAnnex I: STORMWATER DRAINAGE DESIGN PROCEDURES
close this folderA. INTRODUCTION
View the document(introduction...)
View the documentA.1 Drainage systems
View the documentA.2 Aims and principles
close this folderB. PLANNING
View the documentB.1 General
View the documentB.2 Multiple use
View the documentB.3 Natural channels
View the documentB.4 Transfer of problems
View the documentB.5 Storage and reserves
close this folderC. DESIGN CRITERIA
View the documentC.1 Procedures for design and analysis
View the documentC.2 Hydrological models
close this folderC.3 Data
View the document(introduction...)
View the documentC.3.1 Rainfall data
View the documentC.3.2 Runoff data
close this folderC.4 Standards of performance
View the documentC.4.1 Introduction
View the documentC.4.2 Selection of average recurrence intervals
close this folderC.5 Basic design criteria
View the documentC.5.1 Basis of design
View the documentC.5.2 Calculation of stormwater runoff
View the documentC.5.3 Design recurrence intervals
View the documentC.5.4 Calculation of capacity of stormwater drains
View the documentC.5.5 Drainage reserves
close this folderD. FLOOD ESTIMATION
View the documentD.1 General
View the documentD.2 Modified rational method
View the documentD.3 Design hydrograph
View the documentD.4 Partial areas effect
close this folderE. CHANNEL DESIGN
View the documentE.1 General
View the documentE.2 Flow computation
View the documentE.3 Lined channels
View the documentE.4 Vegetated channels
View the documentE.5 Natural channels
View the documentE.6 Unkerbed streets
View the documentE.7 Design calculations
close this folderF. DRAINAGE DESIGN FOR URBAN STREETS AND PIPELINES
View the documentF.1 General
View the documentF.2 Gutter capacity
View the documentF.3 Drainage inlets
View the documentF.4 Pipe flow
View the documentF.5 Pipe system design
close this folderG. PUMPING CAPACITIES AND STORAGE REQUIREMENTS IN POLDERS
View the documentG.1 Principles of drainage in a polder
View the documentG.2 Pumping capacity versus storage requirement

A. Maintenance objectives

The importance of an adequate system for maintenance of the drainage system cannot be overemphasised if the system is to operate at its design capacity. If rubbish and silt are allowed to accumulate in channels and rivers, these facilities will not be capable of satisfactorily fulfilling their primary function - the removal of stormwater run-off. If the inlets into the drainage system from roads are not regularly cleared, they will become blocked and stormwater will be prevented from entering drains, so causing local flooding. The objective of a maintenance programme should, therefore, be to keep the drainage system operating dependably, at its design capacity, without breakdowns.

Protection of the capital investment in the drainage system necessitates a planned programme of inspection and routine clearing. Periodic, thorough and competent inspection while cleaning will reveal points at which damage begins to take place. Adequate financial and labour resources must be allocated to ensure successful drainage operation and maintenance. It is therefore necessary for drainage authorities, usually the local government, to ensure that maintenance is accorded a sufficiently high priority in the allocation of funds in annual budgets.

The objectives of carrying out the maintenance programme should be to:

(a) Keep the system operating at design standard at all times;

(b) Obtain the longest life and greatest use of the systems facilities by providing adequate maintenance and timely repairs;

(c) Achieve the foregoing two objectives at the lowest possible cost.

The history of drainage is full of examples of the difficulties which can occur when maintenance is neglected. Even the best constructed system will eventually fail if adequate maintenance is not undertaken.

Maintenance activity should begin the day the system is placed in operation or, under some circumstances, prior to completion of a system and before the system is placed into operation. Keeping maintenance work current on all facilities in a system is the keystone to any successful drainage enterprise.

There are two primary concepts of maintenance of public property, and most maintenance operations can be readily classified into one of these categories:

(a) Maintenance by necessity;
(b) Preventive maintenance.

“Maintenance by necessity” refers to the practice of “fixing it when it breaks down”. Under this approach cleaning of drains is confined to the minimum necessary to satisfy complaints. Likewise, repair work is undertaken only when a condition becomes so bad that it must be corrected or repaired to restore service or for safety reasons. Unfortunately, this approach is all too common in rapidly growing cities where the funds for routine maintenance are inadequate.

“Preventive maintenance” is represented by a systematic programme of inspection, cleaning and repair that reduces breakdowns and complaints to a minimum. Preventive maintenance not only pays dividends in economical operation; a smooth working system also means uninterrupted removal of water at lower cost with reduced risk of damage from flooding as a result of design storms.

Preventive maintenance also has other distinct advantages:

(a) It can be scheduled and performed on a regular basis at times that least disrupt other operations functions;

(b) Pre-ordered parts can be made more readily available; they may not be so readily available under emergency conditions;

(c) Work can be carried out during normal working hours with less emphasis on extension of hours and weekend work;

(d) More experienced personnel can be used if the work is scheduled; they may not be available in emergencies;

(e) Special tasks of preventive maintenance may be contracted out to reduce the need to carry a specialist workforce.