| |  | |||||||||
Munich IETF August 1997 -- RSVP WG -- Bob Braden, ISI............ Page 1
RSVP Working Group Tuesday August 12, 1997 0900-1000
o Status Report: Bob Braden, Scott Bradner
o Tunneling Draft status: Lixia Zhang
o Future of RSVP Working Group -- Discussion
o Routing and Reservations: Roch Guerin
o RSVP Experience in Commercial Multimedia trials: Mark Bauer
5
30
10
10
5
AGENDA
Munich IETF August 1997 -- RSVP WG -- Bob Braden, ISI............ Page 2
o RSVP into Proposed Standard status Version 1 RSVP spec, ?MD5? Integrity, IPSEC, MIB
o RAPI -> XOPEN standard Draft in preparation
o RSVP [/Int-Serv] Implementation survey
A substantial initial effort -- sent to rsvp-test.
Thanks to:
Gene Gaines -- ggaines@generation.net
Luca Salgarelli -- salga@cefriel.it
STATUS REPORT
Munich IETF August 1997 -- RSVP WG -- Bob Braden, ISI............ Page 3
o RSVP BOF: November 1993 (Houston IETF)
o RSVP WG first met: April 1994 (Seattle IETF)
o This is the 11th IETF at which the RSVP WG has met. (There was also one interim meeting).
o Charter: Version 1 RSVP -> Proposed Std 7/95
o Added: MIB, MD5, IPSEC specs
The RSVP Working Group
Munich IETF August 1997 -- RSVP WG -- Bob Braden, ISI............ Page 4
o Three RSVP/int-serv areas were spun off to
other Working Groups:
-- ISSLL
-- QOSR
-- Policy (mechanisms)
The RSVP Working Group
Munich IETF August 1997 -- RSVP WG -- Bob Braden, ISI............ Page 5
What?s Left Undone?
o Incomplete RSVP features: -- Diagnostic message (almost done) -- Tunneling (esp. IPv6?) -- Semantic fragmentation -- Better solution to KR-II problem -- Session grouping
o Several suggestions for extensions -- CIDR addressing -- Explicit routing -- ...
Munich IETF August 1997 -- RSVP WG -- Bob Braden, ISI............ Page 6
Bigger, Harder Issues
o ?RSVP doesn?t scale? (to large number of sessions)
Direct solution: aggregate RSVP & IS state in the ?middle? of the Internet.
>> Integrated Services with aggregated state is not a simple problem.
>> Still a research problem; not ready for IETF.
o Virtual Private Networks
By some definitions, fall into same category.