
| Bioconversion of Organic Residues for Rural Communities (UNU, 1979) |
| From the charter of the United Nations University |
| Foreword |
| Perspectives on bioconversion of organic residues for rural communities |
![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | Introduction |
![]() | Sources of available nutrients |
![]() | The most suitable materials for bioconversion |
![]() | Characteristics of residues |
![]() | Bioconversion systems |
![]() | Physical and chemical treatments |
![]() | Microbial conversion |
![]() | The animal conversion phase |
![]() | Summary |
![]() | References |
| Availability of organic residues as a rural resource |
![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | Discussion summary: Papers by van der Wal and Barreveld |
| Micro-organisms as tools for rural processing of organic residues |
![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | Introduction |
![]() | Microbial utilization of mono- and di-saccharide residues |
![]() | Microbial conversion of starchy residues |
![]() | Microbial conversion of complex mixtures of compounds (Polysaccharides, Proteins, Lipids, etc.) |
![]() | Microbial utilization of cellulose and ligno-cellulose residues |
![]() | Algal culture as a source of biomass |
![]() | Microbial utilization of silviculture biomass |
![]() | Micro-organisms and marine and freshwater biomass |
![]() | International studies on processing organic residues |
![]() | References |
| Production of feed as an objective for bioconversion systems |
![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | Introduction |
![]() | General characteristics |
![]() | Manure as feed |
![]() | Sewage-grown micro-algae |
![]() | Conclusion |
![]() | References |
| Environmental goals for microbial bioconversion in rural communities |
![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | Introduction |
![]() | Health and water economy |
![]() | Fertilizer and energy economy |
![]() | Concluding remarks |
![]() | References |
![]() | Discussion summary: Papers by Porter, Berk and La Rivière |
| Strategies for developing small-scale fermentation processes in developing countries |
![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | References |
![]() | Discussion summary |
| Production of microbial protein foods on edible substrates, food by-products, and ligno-cellulosic wastes |
![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | Preface |
![]() | Introduction |
![]() | Contributions to the solution of nutritional problems |
![]() | Development of protein-rich vegetarian meat substitutes in the western world |
![]() | References |
![]() | Discussion summary |
| The role of ruminants in the bioconversion of tropical byproducts and wastes into food and fuel |
![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | Introduction |
![]() | Nutritional limitations in the use of tropical by-products and waste |
![]() | Practical experience with tropical by-products and wastes as feed for ruminants |
![]() | An integrated system for converting tropical feeds and byproducts into milk, beef, and fuel |
![]() | References |
![]() | Discussion summary |
| Possible applications of enzyme technology in rural areas |
![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | Introduction |
![]() | Biocatalytic processes |
![]() | Enzyme hydrolysis of manioc |
![]() | Whole cell systems |
![]() | Cellulose degradation and utilization |
![]() | Transfer of enzyme technology to rural communities |
![]() | Conclusions |
![]() | References |
![]() | Discussion summary |
| Indian experience with treated straw as feed |
![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | Introduction |
![]() | Experience with straw treatment |
![]() | Field testing and demonstration of straw treatment |
![]() | General considerations |
![]() | Summary |
![]() | Annex 1. The energy efficiency of the two-stage, feed-fuel processing of straw in indian villages |
![]() | Annex 2. Method of calculating the value presented in table 2 for the efficiency of naoh energy usage |
![]() | Annex 3. Recommendations to farmers on the treatment of straw |
![]() | Annex 4. Calculated efficiency of milk production by straw-fed village buffaloes |
![]() | References |
![]() | Discussion summary |
| Indian experience with algal ponds |
![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | Introduction |
![]() | Cultivation of algae in wastes for feed |
![]() | Problems of contamination |
![]() | Cultivation of algae for biofertilizer |
![]() | References |
![]() | Acknowledgements |
![]() | Discussion summary |
| Organic residues in aquaculture |
![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | Introduction |
![]() | The range of production in aquaculture |
![]() | The value of organic wastes |
![]() | Direct feeding |
![]() | Concluding remarks |
![]() | References |
![]() | Discussion summary |
| Biogas generation: developments. Problems, and tasks - an overview |
![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | Introduction |
![]() | What is biogas? |
![]() | Microbiology of CH4, or bio-methanogenesis |
![]() | The biogas plant-some technical considerations |
![]() | Environmental and operational considerations |
![]() | Developments and processes for rural areas |
![]() | Cost-benefit analyses |
![]() | Health hazards |
![]() | Bottlenecks, considerations, and research and development |
![]() | References |
![]() | Discussion summary |
| Mushroom production technology for rural development |
![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | Materials and methods for growing mushrooms under natural or field conditions |
![]() | Growing mushrooms under semicontrolled conditions |
![]() | Results and discussion |
![]() | References |
![]() | Discussion summary |
| The combination of algal and anaerobic waste treatment in a bioregenerative farm system |
![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | Introduction |
![]() | Algae production on organic wastes |
![]() | The bioregenerative farm |
![]() | References |
![]() | Discussion summary |
| A continuous composting system for disposal and utilization of animal wastes at the village level |
![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | Status of land utilization and disposal of animal wastes |
![]() | A continuous composting system for land utilization of animal wastes at the village level |
![]() | References |
| Bioconversion of fruit and vegetable wastes |
![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | State of the art of bioconversion |
![]() | Technical transfer |
| Integrated research on agricultural waste reclamation |
![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | Introduction |
![]() | Production of yeast from soybean cooking waste at miso factories |
![]() | Application of soy waste as koji substrate for rice miso manufacturing (5, 6) |
![]() | Conclusion |
![]() | References |
![]() | Discussion summary |
| Solid state fermentation of starchy substrates |
![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | Introduction |
![]() | Materials and methods |
![]() | Agro-economic perspectives |
![]() | Summary |
![]() | References |
![]() | Discussion summary |
| Production of single-cell protein from cellulose |
![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | Introduction |
![]() | Experimental results |
![]() | Discussion |
![]() | Summary |
![]() | References |
![]() | Acknowledgements |
![]() | Discussion summary |
| Analysis of energy cost of integrated systems |
![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | Energy cost and energy requirement |
![]() | Why energy analysis? |
![]() | Net energy intensity |
![]() | What criteria are offered by energy analysis? |
![]() | Conclusion |
![]() | References |
| Analysis of bioconversion systems at the village level |
![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | Introduction |
![]() | Approach to bioconversion analysis |
![]() | Some results and costs from integrated systems |
![]() | Future development possibilities |
![]() | Conclusions |
![]() | Summary |
![]() | References |
| Nutritional evaluation of bioconversion products for farm animals |
![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | Introduction |
![]() | Testing procedures for determination of nutritional value |
| Bioconversion products: toxicology - problems and potential |
![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | Summary |
![]() | References |
| Nutritional evaluation in humans |
![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | Introduction |
![]() | Evaluation of products of bioconversion for human consumption |
![]() | Procedures for nutritional evaluation in humans |
![]() | The evaluation of various food products |
![]() | Concept of productivity |
![]() | Conclusions |
![]() | References |
![]() | Discussion summary: Papers by van Weerden, Shacklady, and Bressani |
| Biomass from organic residues for animal and human feeding |
![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | References |
![]() | Discussion summary |
| Appropriate biotechnology - summary remarks |
![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | References |
| Other UNU Publications |
![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | Books |
Micro-organisms such as yeast, bacteria, fungi, or algae are the single-cell proteins used for most bioconversion of wastes or other substrates to make food or feed. A crucial question is: What is the nutritional value for man or animals of the final product of the bioconversion process? A second important aspect is the toxicological status of the product. This is the subject of papers by Scrimshaw and Shacklady appearing elsewhere in these proceedings, and my presentation is based on the assumption that the materials are acceptable toxicologically. I will consider some points that must be taken into account when evaluating a bioconversion product for animal feeding.
The main reasons for using micro-organisms in the conversion of agricultural residues are: First, to degrade that part of the residue that is not available for absorption by animals or man when the material is fed as such. In most cases this means that the enzymes secreted in the animal or human gastro-intestinal tract cannot, or are insufficiently able to, break down the material into components that can be absorbed. This pertains to cellulosic, hemicellulosic, and ligno-cellulosic components. The second purpose is to upgrade the nutritional quality of the residue by increasing its protein content, or, for monogastric animals and man, raising its content of essential amino acids.
Of the four categories of micro-organisms involved in bioconversion processes (yeasts, bacteria, fungi, and algae), a considerable amount of information is available about the nutritional value of yeasts. Species of yeast have been used for many years as a valuable component of animal feeds, supplying proteins and certain vitamins. In addition, some of the large-scale industrial SCP processes developed over the past ten years use yeasts that utilize hydrocarbons (i.e., paraffins) as an energy source and carbon and hydrogen for growth and synthesis of cell constituents. The results of extensive evaluation programmes show that these yeasts form a highly valuable source of protein for monogastric animals.
The second category of SCP, the bacteria, have, for many centuries, contributed to food supplies for man in an indirect manner: the protein supply of the ruminant is largely dependent on the bacteria and protozoa abundantly present in the fore-stomach of the animal, which forms, in principle, a large in vivo fermentation vessel.
Bacteria will be used in several large units being constructed for industrial protein production where methane or methanol will provide the energy. The data available show that bacterial material produced in this way also forms a highly valuable protein source.
The last two categories of SCP, the fungi and algae, have until now not been used to any extent in animal feeding, and this is why very little is known about the nutritional value of these products. The scarce data in the literature show variable results and indicate that, for monogastric animals, digestibility may be a problem. ILOB experiments with a fungal product showed reasonable results for digestibility and growth performance in pigs, but the results in poultry were unsatisfactory. Because fungi and algae will most likely be the microorganisms of choice for the small-scale bioconversion units considered in this work shop, a thorough look at the nutritional value of the material produced is essential. I would especially stress the necessity of testing nutritional value at an early stage of process development in order to be able to provide some sort of guidance for that development, for example, the choice of the micro-organism or the relevance of including a special treatment, if possible.