Cover Image
close this bookHydropolitics along the Jordan River. Scarce Water and Its Impact on the Arab-Israeli Conflict (UNU, 1995, 272 pages)
View the documentAcknowledgements
View the document1. Introduction
close this folder2. Hydrography and history
View the document(introduction...)
View the documentHydrography
close this folderHistory - Water conflict and cooperation
View the document(introduction...)
View the documentThe emergence of agriculture and nationalism
View the documentPre-1923: The shaping of modern nations
View the document1923-1948: Nationalism, immigration, and "economic absorptive capacity"
View the document1948-1964: Unilateral development and the Johnston negotiations
View the document1964-1982: "Water Wars" and territorial adjustments
View the documentIsrael, the West Bank, and Gaza
View the document1982-Present: Hydrologic limits and peacemaking
View the documentHydroconspiracy theories: The "hydraulic imperative," and "hydronationalism"
View the documentConclusions: Historic summary and lessons for the future
close this folder3. Towards an interdisciplinary approach to water basin analysis and the resolution of international water disputes
View the document(introduction...)
View the document3.1. Introduction
View the document3.2. The nature of water conflicts
close this folder3.3. Paradigms for analysis of international water conflicts
View the document(introduction...)
View the document3.3.1 Physical sciences and technology
View the document3.3.2 Law
View the document3.3.3 Political science
View the document3.3.4 Economics
View the document3.3.5 Game theory
View the document3.3.6 Alternative dispute resolution (ADR)
close this folder3.4. An interdisciplinary approach to water basin analysis and conflict resolution
View the document(introduction...)
View the document3.4.1 Summary of disciplinary survey
View the document3.4.2 Towards an interdisciplinary approach
View the document3.4.3 Water and its evaluation
close this folder4. Interdisciplinary analysis and the Jordan River watershed
View the document(introduction...)
View the document4.1. Introduction
close this folder4.2. Preliminary watershed analysis
View the document4.2.1 Survey of hydropolitical positions
View the document4.2.2 Goal statement and planning horizon
View the document4.2.3 Future water supply and demand, "water stress" index
close this folder4.3. Evaluation framework
View the document4.3.1 Options and viability
View the document4.3.2 Recommendations
close this folder4.4. Cooperation-inducing implementation: Three examples
View the document(introduction...)
View the document4.4.1 Towards an agreement for sharing existing resources
View the document4.4.2 Negotiations over the mountain aquifer
View the document4.4.3 A Med-Dead or Red-Dead Canal as a cooperation-inducing desalination project
View the document4.5. Conclusions: Water basin analysis and the Jordan River watershed
View the document5. Summary and conclusions
View the documentAfterword: Parting the waters
close this folderAppendices
View the documentAppendix I: Maps
View the documentAppendix II: Zionist boundaries, 1919
View the documentAppendix III: Hydronationalism
View the documentAppendix IV: PRINCE political accounting system
View the documentAppendix V: JRDNRVR. BAS projection model
View the documentAppendix VI: Med-Dead/Red-Dead desalination project
close this folderSources
View the documentInterviews Interviews (carried out 1989-1992)
View the documentBibliography

4.5. Conclusions: Water basin analysis and the Jordan River watershed

In this chapter, I have brought together the general approach to water conflict analysis, as developed in chapter 3, and the site-specific lessons learned from the history of the Jordan River watershed to try to gain insight into how both the water crisis - the shortage of water within the basin - and the water conflict - the political tensions attendant on the lack of water - might be resolved.

In the first section of the chapter, I looked at the initial conditions of the watershed - that is, who are the actors, and what are their political concerns and future water needs. I then applied the framework for water basin evaluation that was developed in chapter 3, to the Jordan River watershed. The evaluation suggested a four-stage process for water basin development.

The final section offered three examples of cooperation-inducing design. The first two dealt with proposed water allocations, one between all of the riparians dependent on the Jordan, and the second focusing on Israeli and Palestinian concerns regarding the mountain aquifer on the West Bank. The final example was a project for regional desalination that might be designed specifically to induce cooperation.

As mentioned in chapter 3, by combining lessons from a variety of disciplines, new options for conflict resolution can become apparent. This chapter showed, through concrete examples of the planning and project opportunities suggested for a watershed enmeshed in deep and intractable conflict, how this may be so. Had I looked at the options for water transfers, for example, solely on the basis of the technical or economic merits, they would have looked fairly similar to each other. By including political viability, however, I was able to determine, at least tentatively, which plan suggested greater viability at this point in time. By including the guidelines from the history of the basin with lessons taught by ADR and political science, I was able to offer new approaches to resolve the fairly intractable positions on water conflicts that have lasted for decades.

Each of the disciplines that provides a measure for the analysis of water conflict offers an important component of an integrated evaluation of the options open to the riparians of a watershed under conflict. Working in concert, however, they offer new ways around entrenched impasses and may help to provide a path for ancient enmities finally to be laid aside.