
| Annexes |
![]() | Annex 2 - Organizational capacity assessment tool1 |
![]() |
|
Name of NGO __________________________
Date of assessment
______________________
Assessment conducted by _________________
Governance
|
1. Board |
Score |
|
a. The board provides overall policy direction and
oversight. | |
|
b. The board provides accountability and credibility. | |
|
c. The board is composed of committed members who represent the
varied interests of the constituents. | |
|
d. The board is capable of carrying out key roles such as policy
formulation, fund raising, public relation and lobbying. | |
|
Total |
|
2. Mission and goal |
Score |
|
a. The mission and goal are clearly articulated. | |
|
b. The mission is understood by staff, constituency and the
public. | |
|
c. Strategies are aligned with mission and realistic. | |
|
d. Strategic planning is jointly conducted by the Board, senior
management, staff with input/participation from other stakeholders. | |
|
Total |
|
3. Leadership |
Score |
|
a. Board and senior management have a clear understanding of their
roles and responsibilities as providers of overall direction. | |
|
b. Senior management's relationship to staff is
participatory, transparent and management decisions are delegated. | |
|
c. Leadership is accessible and fosters participation. | |
|
d. Succession plan(s) for key managers exist(s) or is being
developed. | |
|
Total |
Management
|
1. Organization structure |
Score |
|
a. The organizational structure clearly defines lines of
authorities and responsibilities. | |
|
b. Systems exist to collect, analyze and disseminate data and
information. | |
|
c. Decisions are based on data. | |
|
d. Open communication and feedbacking mechanism in
place. | |
|
Total |
|
2. Planning |
Score |
|
a. Operating plans are developed, reviewed, updated and reflect a
strategic plan. | |
|
b. Staff are involved in planning. | |
|
c. Resources are planned for and allocated properly. | |
|
d. Input from constituents is included in planning. | |
|
Total |
|
3. Monitoring and evaluation |
Score |
|
a. A monitoring and evaluation system exists and outputs are
used. | |
|
b. Constituents and staff are involved in monitoring and
evaluation. | |
|
c. Regularly reports activities and results of evaluations to
stakeholders. | |
|
d. Disseminates or shares reports on lessons learned. | |
|
Total |
|
4. Program development |
Score |
|
a. System for routinely collecting information about program
operations is in place or being developed (product/service mix, utilization
levels and patterns, client profile(s), etc.). | |
|
b. Operations are guided by an implementation (or business) plan
against which performance is regularly monitored and evaluated. | |
|
c. Service quality guidelines exist or are being
developed. | |
|
d. Unit cost per benefit/client can be calculated for each main
service. | |
|
Total |
Human resource development
|
1. Personnel management |
Score |
|
a. Recruitment, employment and personnel practices are clearly
defined and followed. | |
|
b. Clearly established links exist between staff capacity and NGO
mission. | |
|
c. Internal regulations governing staff rights and obligations
(e.g., working hours, entitlements, discipline and codes of conduct, etc.)
exist, function and are supported with written procedures and
guidelines. | |
|
d. Job descriptions are well defined, documented and respected and
updated. | |
|
Total |
|
2. Work environment |
Score |
|
a. Staff members participate in management decisions. | |
|
b. Staff members are encouraged to make suggestions and to share
ideas to improve organizational performance. | |
|
c. Team work is practiced or encouraged. | |
|
d. Information is shared freely among all staff
members. | |
|
Total |
|
3. Staff development |
Score |
|
a. Human resources development planning takes place and based on
the capacity needs and strategic objectives of the organization. | |
|
b. Staff members are cross-trained to facilitate backup coverage
of multiple functions as well as personal professional growth. | |
|
c. Opportunities exist to integrate skills acquired in staff
development activities into the work environment. | |
|
d. Evaluations and promotions are based on performance and are
equitable. | |
|
Total |
|
4. Salary, benefits and performance |
Score |
|
a. Salaries are clearly structured and competitive. | |
|
b. Benefits policy is written and practiced. | |
|
c. Performance is regularly assessed and used in furthering staff
capacity and organization mission. | |
|
d. Productivity indicators exist and are used to evaluate field
staff and supervisor performance on a regular basis. | |
|
Total |
Financial resources
|
1. Accounting and financial management systems |
Score |
|
a. Accounting system (standards, policies, records, reporting)
exists, functions and is supported with written procedures and
guidelines. | |
|
b. Approved versus actual budget expenditures, revenues and
cashflows are reviewed at least quarterly - variances are explained and budgets
are revised as appropriate. | |
|
c. Managers and program supervisors receive financial information
on expenses and income, and use it to make program decision for which they are
accountable. | |
|
d. Accounting system(s) can segregate the costs of delivering each
principal product/service. | |
|
Total |
|
2. Financial control and budgeting |
Score |
|
a. Adequate financial and inventory controls exist and are
implemented. | |
|
b. Internal and external financial reviews are performed with
regular and appropriate frequency to assure transparency. | |
|
c. Regular budgeting process is developed and integrated into
annual operating plans. | |
|
d. Staff members are responsible for preparation, management and
implementation of project budgets. | |
|
Total |
Service delivery
|
1. Sectoral expertise |
Score |
|
a. Relevant sectoral expertise exists within
organization. | |
|
b. Expertise is credible and recognized by the development
community. | |
|
c. Capable of adapting program and service delivery to the
changing needs of constituency. | |
|
d. Appropriate structures exist to reach grassroots. | |
|
Total |
|
2. Community participation |
Score |
|
a. Information about current or planned services are routinely
shared with intended beneficiary communities. | |
|
b. Administrative structure is either decentralized or has
consultative mechanisms in place that make it responsive to local
needs. | |
|
c. Community input is used in decision-making. | |
|
d. Community members sit on the organization's local
governing body (e.g., board of directors or board of trustees) | |
|
Total |
|
3. Impact assessment |
Score |
|
a. Indicators of success and impact were jointly identified and
established with the community partners. | |
|
b. Baseline data measurements are monitored and regularly
analyzed. | |
|
c. Data gathering and analysis for impact assessment are jointly
undertaken with community partners. | |
|
d. impact assessments are used to adjust programs as
required. | |
|
Total |
External relations
|
1. Community partners |
Score |
|
a. Seen as credible and a valuable resource by the target
group. | |
|
b. The relationship with target group is one of full partners
serving a common purpose. | |
|
c. Program priorities and services are defined in collaboration
with constituency and are based on need and institutional capacity. | |
|
d. Constituency perceives service delivery is adequate and cost
effective. | |
|
Total |
|
2. Other development organizations |
Score |
|
a. Networks and shares resources with national an international
NGOs. | |
|
b. Plays leadership role in promoting coalitions, networks,
linkaging and mechanisms for advocacy. | |
|
c. Has contacts with decision makers and is able to engage policy
makers in dialogue. | |
|
d. Exchange of resource occurs between NGO and government
(training, TA, material resource, etc.) | |
|
Total |
|
3. Donors |
Score |
|
a. Has diversified contacts within the donor
community. | |
|
b. Regarded as a credible and valuable resource to
donor(s). | |
|
c. Capable of asserting and negotiating with donors. | |
|
d. Has the opportunity to engage in open and frank dialogue with
donor(s). | |
|
Total |
|
4. Other local organizations |
Score |
|
a. Has relations with private business sector, academic and
research institutions and the media for technical expertise, material and human
resources. | |
|
b. It is perceived as a community partner. | |
|
c. Known and its opinions and experiences are
solicited. | |
|
d. Information on the organization is available and mechanism for
dissemination exists. | |
|
Total |
Organization and program sustainability
|
1. Commitment |
Score |
|
a. Interested in decreasing or eliminating donor
dependence. | |
|
b. Believes that one can be a non-profit and still think and
behave in a business-like way. | |
|
c. Accepts that it is permissible for programs to charge user
fees. | |
|
d. Prepared to eliminate unfunded cost centers. | |
|
Total |
|
2. Strategic thinking |
Score |
|
a. A strategic plan for achieving organizational objectives exists
or is being developed. | |
|
b. Strategic plan Incorporates financing implications and needs of
programmatic goals and objectives. | |
|
c. Succession plan(s) for key managers exist(s) or is being
developed. | |
|
d. Decisions are based on data. | |
|
Total |
|
3. Marketing |
Score |
|
a. Information on the needs and wants of target clients or
beneficiaries is collected or regularly updated and periodically reviewed in
relation to the product/services offered by the organization. | |
|
b. Client or beneficiary satisfaction is regularly
assessed. | |
|
c. Information is regularly collected on availability and prices
of services offered by actual or potential competitors. | |
|
d. Marketing plan exists or is being developed and responsibility
for its implementation is assigned to specific individual(s). | |
|
Total |
|
4. Efficiency of operation |
Score |
|
a. Client volume is steady or increasing overtime. | |
|
b. Operating costs compare favorably to those of other
organizations with similar services and clients. | |
|
c. Shares resources as a member of a network or with other
organizations. | |
|
d. Makes use of trained volunteers among whom there is infrequent
turnover. | |
|
Total |
|
5. Reliance on donor support |
Score |
|
a. Decrease in reliance on a few donors (i.e., diversification of
donor base). | |
|
b. Type of donor funding is less restrictive (e.g., more
institutional development, fewer program-specific grants). | |
|
c. Amount of donor funds rising less rapidly relative to other
sources of income. | |
|
d. Donor funds cover a decreasing portion of operating
capital. | |
|
Total |
|
6. Alternatives to donor financing |
Score |
|
a. Systems/procedures for local fundraising are in place or are
being developed. | |
|
b. Cost recovery (fee for services) systems are in place or are
being developed. | |
|
c. Income-generating activities which generate a surplus exist or
are being planned. | |
|
d. The local government resources are tapped or will provide
support (drugs, personnel, buildings, etc.) | |
|
Total |
|
6. Income-generating enterprise existence and
operation |
Score |
|
a. Mission/objectives of the enterprise are clearly defined and
known within the PVO. | |
|
b. Enterprise has its own operational structure and systems
including its own staff and managers who have experience in the activities
undertaken. | |
|
c. Costs/revenues of the enterprise are known and routinely
monitored against a business plan. | |
|
d. Enterprise is based on a feasibility study of its economic
viability. | |
|
Total |