
| Forestry Training Manual: Inter-America Region (Peace Corps, 1986) |
Record Keeping - More Group Process
Total Time - 2 hours 15 minutes
Goals:
- To establish the importance of record keeping, as scientists and as responsible Peace Corps Volunteers.
- To observe group process.
Overview
This exercise is devoted to the importance of accurate record keeping not only during training but also as a professional habit during Peace Corps service. The groups will also look at its own group process.
Exercise:
I. Record Keeping
I I. Group Process
Materials
Flip charts, maker pens, tape.
Exercise I: - Record keeping
Total Time:
1½ hours
Overview
The purpose of this exercise is to provide trainees with an opportunity to realize the importance of record keeping as a must during training, and also during Peace Corps service.
Procedure
|
Time |
Activities | |
|
Data Collection |
1. Trainer divides participants in groups of five, asking that
people get together with others with whom they have not worked. | |
|
2. Trainer gives the group the following problem posted on
newsprint: | ||
|
What information would you need to know if you arrived three weeks
after an experiment in germination was set-up, in a nursery and you are expected
to take over the experiment? Trainer asks groups to make a list of all data they
would need. | ||
|
10 minutes |
3. Have two groups meet together and combine their
lists. | |
|
10 minutes |
4. Combined groups present to large group their combined data
sheets. | |
|
Trainer's Note: The purpose of combining groups (making
them large ) is to have groups experience what it will be like in the field,
having people with the same information, but articulating it in a different
way. | ||
|
30 minutes |
5. The combined groups are now given the task of designing a
record keeping form. They must figure out how they can best do the task with
such a large group. The form developed is put on newsprint. | |
|
10 minutes |
6. Groups take presentations and critique each others
forms. | |
|
10 minutes |
7. Trainer summerizes as follows using newsprint: | |
|
Data Sheet | ||
|
a. careful layout | ||
|
b. easy to read | ||
|
c. easy to use | ||
|
d. all on one sheet if possible | ||
|
e. all data can he important | ||
|
8. Trainer stresses once again the importance of keeping records
during training. | ||
|
9. Move from this exercise directly into the "Group Process"
exercise. | ||
Exercise II - Group Process
Total Time - 45 minutes
Goals:
- To explore the group process.
- To understand collaboration.
Overview
In this exercise experiential learnings and group collaboration are emphasized.
Procedure:
|
Time |
Activities | |
|
1. Each group is instructed to discuss observations of the group
process, both on a technical and interpersonal level. Sore questions that may
stimulate discussion are: | ||
|
a. What were the reactions of group members regarding various
individual technical skill levels in the group? | ||
|
b. Did people find it a help or a hinderance to work with people
of different skill levels? | ||
|
c. How were decisions made during the data/form making
process? | ||
|
d. That factors contributed to or impeded mutually shared
decision-making? | ||
|
2. Trainer presents a summary of various styles in group
decision-making, including: | ||
|
- The "pulp" | ||
|
- Self authorization | ||
|
- Handclasp | ||
|
- Baiting | ||
|
- Authority rule | ||
|
- Majority vote | ||
|
- Unanimous consent | ||
|
- Consensus | ||
|
A short discussion follows concerning the potentially positive
(satisfying) or negative (frustrating) consequences of each type of
decision-making technique. Trainer should point out that all the styles, with
the exception of consensus, often preclude the full involvement and commitment
of some group members, or ignore important issues that should be raised.
Mutually-shared decision-making, termed consensus, is a positive alternative to
other styles; although it may require more time and increased sensitivity to the
individual group member it provides for the involvement and commitment necessary
for group cohesiveness and cooperation. | ||
|
10 minutes |
3. Each group meets to discuss the styles of decision-making that
characterized their group during the record keeping exercise. | |
|
4. Trainer guides a summary of group conclusions concerning
decision-making styles and group cooperation. Some points for discussion are:
| ||
|
a. The perceived value of different styles to facilitate
accomplishing a group task, | ||
|
b. The reaction of group members to various styles,
| ||
|
c. Observations of ways to improve group dynamics during training,
| ||
|
d. The application of such experience to the role of the volunteer
in forestry extension work
. | ||