Nutrition Improvement and Economic Growth
A direct comparison of economic and nutritional outcomes can be
done and is likely to be illuminating in that it suggests where to look for
other major contributing causes of the nutritional changes observed. Thus, in
Figure 3.1, the percentage change in per caput GDP is compared with
percentage point change in preschool underweight prevalences with data from the
last two decades. Those countries which grew most rapidly can be seen to have
also made good progress in nutrition. India, Egypt, and Pakistan for example did
somewhat worse than might be expected, while Zimbabwe and Malaysia did better.
The relationship between economic growth and rate of change in nutritional
outcomes was strong. The linear fit to the data is used here to calculate
residuals; the quadratic fit is due substantially to the low right hand data
points. Of the case studies, only for Thailand does the residual change
significantly between the two models, so for this purpose the choice makes
little difference.
We cannot however ascribe deviations from this directly to the
type of economic policies adopted themselves, because we need later to look at
the effects of human resource development policies (Chapter 4) and nutrition
programmes (Chapter 5). The deviation might be explained by such factors as the
degree of equity in the economic growth, its poverty-alleviating effect, the
priority attached by the government to social support (reflected in its spending
on health, education and welfare) and the effect of more direct
nutrition-related programmes. Zimbabwe for example, achieved significant
nutritional improvements during the 1980s despite economic decline. Clearly,
nutritional improvement can move ahead of economic development, due to the type
of factors mentioned above. Moreover, in Mexico and Brazil, the nutrition
situation continued to improve during a period of economic stagnation (as it had
done during the 1970s boom) but much more slowly. Nutrition does seem to be
resilient in the face of economic
decline.