Cover Image
close this bookBoiling Point No. 45 - Low-cost Electrification for Household Energy (ITDG, 2000, 44 p.)
View the document(introduction...)
View the documentPreface
View the documentTheme editorial: Low-cost electrification; the need for access to energy services
View the documentRural energy development: an integrated approach in Nepal
View the documentGaining ground in community micro-hydro power development in Kenya
View the documentRural electrification in Nepal: Experiences of an integrative social contextual approach
View the documentFuel for lighting; an expensive commodity
View the documentDemand side management for rural Nepal
View the document‘Micro-privatising’ rural power distribution - mass produced community development in Orissa, India
View the documentGTZ pages
View the documentElectricity for the Urban Poor
View the documentWindpower: Small is beautiful
View the documentManagement of sustainable photovoltaic solar energy in the semi-arid region of the State of Pernambuco, Brazil
View the documentTariffs for rural grid electrification
View the documentFrom candles to compact fluorescents
View the documentConsumer response to mobile solar water heating in the low-income sector, South Africa
View the documentClay Grate Development in Chibau Khera, India
View the documentWhat’s happening in household energy?
View the documentPublications & Letters
View the documentITDG energy news

Rural energy development: an integrated approach in Nepal

by C. McMenemy1, M. Williamson and F. Vitez2

1 Christopher McMenemy was a geography Ph.D. candidate at the University of Cambridge, studying energy and community issues in Nepal and northern India, when be and three others were killed in a yachting accident off the Dutch coast in August 2000. At the time of his death, this article was a work in progress. It is based on the paper he presented at the World Renewable Energy Congress held in Brighton, UK, July 2000

2 Lamjung Electricity Development Company, PO Box 5926, Kathmandu, Nepal


Figure 1: Location of projects

Dloppement de l’rgie rurale au Nl: une approche int/B>

Cet article passe en revue l’expence de deux rnts projets rgques de dloppement au Nl. Les deux projets ont pour objectif la rction de la pauvretans des zones physiquement isol et nomiquement marginalis. Selon cet article, les effets des projets sont optimums si les besoins rgques de base sont intavec des objectifs productifs. Afin de minimiser les risques, un effort substantiel doit e accordux institutions locales et ronales.

This article discusses two case studies in Nepal (Figure 1).

· the Community Based Economic Development Project - CBED in Jumla

· the Community-Based Integrated Energy Planning Project - CBIEP in Lamjung

These projects focused mainly on the development of community-owned micro-hydro power systems (MHP - see Figure 2), which can be used for lighting, but could also be used for mechanical end-uses. (Two of the more common end uses are grinding and oil expelling.)

Project 1: Community-Based Economic Development Project (CBED)

CBED is a medium-sized development project run by the Centre for International Studies and Cooperation, a Canadian INGO based out of Montreal. This paper focuses on the MHP initiatives in one District, Jumla (Figure 3), which is one of the poorest areas in the country where;

· The majority of the population are poor farmers.
· The average household income is Rs. 40000 per year (£365 or $590)
· Both assets and income are distributed relatively equitably

The goal of the CBED project is to ‘build and strengthen Community Based Organisations (CBOs) so that they can develop as viable economic institutions, capable of effectively managing natural resources, improving socio-economic conditions in their communities and interacting productively with local elected officials and government agencies at the district level’

The strategy is to form organisations such as NGOs or co-operatives that can provide a link between the users and the state. To date, the project has generally been successful - the production and sales of cash crops has increased; MHPs have been built and are operating reasonably well; and numerous workshops have been held with the state and local officials; and it is well-received among villagers.

Project 2: Community-Based Integrated Energy Planning Project (CBIEP)

The CBIEP was conducted by the Lamjung Electricity Development Company (LEDCO) in the District of Lamjung, Nepal. LEDCO is a private Nepalese company, owned by a group of investors from Lamjung District.

The social and economic conditions in Lamjung are relatively better than in Jumla.

· The district is fairly wealthy due to its proximity with the road, existence of army pensions and a reasonably developed infrastructure (e.g. phones, some irrigation).

· The literacy rate is 42%.

· On average people have more land per household and a large number of people are able to grow enough food for their own consumption.


Figure 2: 10kW micro-hydro power system

M Williamson


Figure 3: The village of Hun in Patrasi, Jumla

M Williamson

The goal of the project was to implement MHP systems so that a range of renewable energy systems could support themselves financially. Therefore, the project sought to develop an energy strategy that was integrated with local economic development objectives.

The specific goals of the project were:

· Short-term: through participatory planning, develop an energy management strategy for two Village Development Committees (VDCs) - Kolki and Ilampokhari

· Long-term: improve the ability of communities to plan for the sustainable use of local energy resources.

The project sought to achieve these goals through the establishment of Village Energy and Environment Committees (VEECs) that would serve:

· as intermediaries between the community, the state and manufacturers;
· centres of local knowledge about energy;
· long-term decision-making bodies

The effectiveness of local institutions is crucial in determining:

· The size of the benefits;
· How they are distributed.

Clearly other factors come into play, but without a solid institutional foundation, the productiveness of systems is seriously hindered and this has a detrimental effect on those who can not afford other energy.

Discussion

Micro-hydro infrastructure has three main aims:

· providing for basic needs;
· improving economic and agricultural productivity;
· improving human capabilities through the developing of new businesses/markets

The number of failed rural energy projects is evidence that the provision of energy infrastructure alone is not enough to bring about these aims.

The questions still facing us - as implementers, planners and technologists - is; how does energy infrastructure fulfil development objectives? How do we ensure that development is positive for the greatest number?

Decentralised energy development does offer rural areas benefits:

· the only way to reach many remote areas

· environmental benefits and long-term sustainability through the use of renewable resources

· scale is often more appropriate to local needs - 100 W to 150 W per household, and, with the introduction of affordable energy efficient lighting systems, future household power demand will be considerably less than this

· the rural sector provides security from markets biased in favour of urban areas

· decentralised decision making

- use of local knowledge
- freedom and flexibility in the hours and types of energy use, payment systems;
- the development of local organisations adds value in itself - i.e. it builds social capital.

Of course, decentralisation also faces obstacles:

· financial risk and lack of capital
· lack of local experience (technical and managerial)
· collective action problems (fairness and accountability)

So, the practical challenge is first making MHP systems run, and second, ensuring that they run well.

The costs facing an MHP plant suggests that there is a break-even point where productive end-uses generate enough money that the cost of domestic - or basic needs - applications drop to a level where they are affordable for all. It is likely that certain end-uses have different impacts for different groups (Table 1).

Comparisons between the projects

The projects are similar in that they sought to implement energy through community-based energy strategies, but they are different in that:

· Energy was only one aspect of the CBED project, whereas it was the main goal of the CBIEP project

· the CBIEP looked at a broader range of energy technologies, whereas CBED only focused on MHP electrification as an energy strategy.

Distribution of benefits

The point is to ask how effective these projects have been in creating benefits and new opportunities. A good place to start was to ask people what they think!

In the CBED project, people were asked how electricity had fit into their development objectives, as well as the benefits and drawbacks of electrification systems, as shown in Table 2

Similarly, in the CBIEP project, people were asked to identify their specific development objectives (Table 3). Energy strategies were subsequently developed around this feedback.

Subsequently, people were asked how much they would be willing to pay for four measures needed in order to get an idea of the likely distribution of benefits (Table 4).

· to make a lump-sum payment for energy services (e.g. for installation or repair)
· for lighting
· for grinding
· for oil expelling

Not surprisingly, willingness to pay was always related to household income. Also;

· people with more income spend slightly more on energy,
· poor people spend a much higher of percentage of their income on energy services

This trend is likely to become more pronounced with increasing levels of development. If there was a greater range of services, it is likely that either the prices would be set above what poor people could afford, or richer people would have greater access to services.

The second aspect of the study analysed how benefits were distributed within the household, as shown in Table 5.

Table 1: Impact of certain end-uses on different groups

End-Use

Effect

Potential Bias

Electrified Pumpsets

Increases agricultural productivity due to irrigation

· in favour of small farmers due to increased labour-intensity in agriculture, especially if combined with credit and high yield seeds
· large farmers may require additional labour

Agro-processing

Reduces drudgery due to mechanisation

· in favour of large farmers because it decreases the need for labour
· may reduce workload for women, who typically perform majority of agro-processing tasks

Lighting, communication

Longer working day, greater communication with outside world, health and cleanliness

· no huge difference in benefits between households
· tends to have a larger positive effect upon women and children, since they spend the majority of their time in the household
· may also add to the number of domestic tasks for women

Industry and Small Business Applications

Improved productive efficiency, potential stimulation in local economy

· business owners clearly benefit from improved production and business environment.
· the demand for labour may also increase due to the creation of new enterprises.

Table 2: CBED project; the role of electricity in development objectives, benefits and drawbacks

Village

Stated development objectives

Stated benefits of electrification

Stated drawbacks of electrification

Urthu

Road Irrigation Bridges

clean & healthy stay up later fuelwood savings (1/3 bari per day)

repairing the canal, cost, irregularity of service, and potential disagreements

Khalabada

Road, Drinking water

clean & healthy, literacy, time saving in domestic work

no drawbacks mentioned

Barkotebada

Road, Electricity, Drinking water

clean & healthy, wood savings, literacy

repairing the canal

Table 3: CBIEP project; Development objectives and strategy

Priority

Participants objectives for energy development (after VEEC meetings)

Strategy

Cooking

- improve health and cleanliness in the home
- prevent further deforestation

combination of improved cooking stoves and forestry management

Lighting and Communication

- use radios, television, and VHF telephones
- provide alternative to kerosene or lighting
- provide lighting for group discussions

all objectives must be met through electrification. Examining MHP development and grid extension.

Agricultural Processing

- reduce the workload of women
- improve the yield from crops in order to generate income

both can be met through development of MHP and modification of existing diesel systems

Income Generation

- encourage entrepreneurial opportunities ovens, and investment opportunities for savings and credit organisations

specifically identified bakery cinema halls, water pumping, sawmills and marketing of non-timber forest products as avenues to generate income.

Conclusions

Judging by these findings, there are three broad statements can be made:

· energy does offer benefits to the whole community - rich/poor and men/women - and there is great potential to realise positive development centred upon energy intensification

· there is a risk that benefits will be appropriated by richer households, for the simple reason that rich households have the money to spend.

· before we can talk about distribution and equity, we also need to ensure that systems do indeed function. In remote areas and low-income areas, this is still a major challenge.

Three key lessons to ensure that energy remains accessible to all

· Decentralisation means that communities will have to assume financial responsibility

- when something breaks, it is up to the community to find the money to replace it. This has implications:

- because everyone has to pool together, the participation of poor households may be limited - clearly, users will only contribute what the poorest can afford.

- households may divert money from other essential areas - e.g. education - due to social pressure. The solution is to ensure that MHPs have other areas for income generation:

- productive end uses should exist which will generate economic linkages between energy and MHP. Of course, this also maximises the breadth of the development impacts of the system.

- the implementation strategy and the organisational structure will determine whether the system will function well. Where linkages are generated, it is more likely that systems will be used for some sort of income generation, although it is not possible from this data to say who will benefit.

· The introduction of MHP is often technically new and challenging in remote rural regions. Often people do not know how to fix or manage the systems so the most educated, which is usually the most wealthy, have the say in decision-making. Less educated people - the poor and women - are limited in their participation because they cannot read or write. If the women are omitted from decision-making and the poor contribute a greater amount of their income to energy services, then it is fairly obvious who will suffer. The solution to this is to provide training to the greatest number of people - i.e. generate human capital. This ensures that everyone has a say in decision-making and that everyone understands the operation of plants.

· While decentralisation does offer the benefits of economic efficiency and appropriate-ness, it also offers an opportunity for opportunism - for example, outright pilfering of funds. The only solution to this is to ensure that linkages and enforcement mechanisms exist between the state and local organisations.

Table 4: Willingness to pay for services


Average

Amount Market Rate

Lump Sum

Rs. 870

comparable to national expenditure on domestic energy of 1% of annual income

Lighting

Rs. 16.5 per month for 40W bulb

approximately 40% of suggested value

Grinding

Rs. 2.0 per kg of flour

Rs. 1.0 at district bazaar

Oil Expelling

Rs. 33.0 per litre of oil

Rs. 18-20 at oil expeller or Rs. 60 per litre for oil in the market

Table 5: Benefits of electrification; distribution within households

Lighting

· CBED: The fire burns for less time since there is electric light - approximately 20% less wood used.
- Because women do the majority of the wood collection, we would expect that this results in a timesaving of 195 hours for women and 109 hours for men.
· CBED, CBIEP: Both projects indicated improved health and cleanliness in the home. This has greater impact upon women who spend more time in the house
· If the project is part of an integrated development strategy, lighting enables women’s evening literacy classes, cottage industry, improved education. These were all mentioned as benefits, but are obviously NOT quantifiable. Conclusion: Generally better for women

Agro-processing

· CBED: modern grinder is 10 times faster than a traditional ghatta. Since the average household grinds 965 kg of flour per year, and women do 80% of this task, it results in a potential time saving of 115 hours.
Higher yield expected from automatic oil expeller. There is a minimal time saving (3 day trip to the bazaar), but potential income saving of Rs. Rs. 100 to 200 per year. Some households indicated that they would start growing oil crops if there was an expeller available, resulting in greater saving.
Huge benefit that the expeller would be used by other areas, resulting in the growth of a small local industry and a lowering of cost of electricity for all.
· IEP: In Lamjung, looking at all agro-processing tasks and similar results were seen. On average, there was a potential time saving of 327 of 327 hours: approximately 83 hours for men and 244 hours for women.
Conclusion: Generally better for women

Others Impacts

· CBED: See that electricity stimulated new businesses in the towns (e.g. three new shops opened in Urthu since the start of electricity). In other villages, the MHP was used as a source of capital for loans - the income from the loans reduced the cost of electricity for all.
· CBIEP: the potential for entrepreneurial activities was discussed (individual renting pumping services, cinema hall, bakery oven, sawmill)
Conclusion: Not conclusive, but likely to be of greater concern for men.