Bygone Beliefs
by H. Stanley Redgrove

page 1  (69 pages)
to previous section
2to next section

<.> = coordinate covalent bond.
<#s> = subscripted #.
<#S> = superscripted #.
{} mark non-ascii characters.
"Emphasis" _italics_ have a * mark.
@@@ marks a reference to internal page numbers.
Comments and guessed at characters in {braces} need stripped/fixed.
Footnotes have not been re-numbered, however, [#] are moved to EOParagraph.
The footnotes that have duplicate numbers across 2 pages are "a" and "b".
"Protected" indentations have a space before the [Tab].
EOL- have been converted to ([Soft Hyphen]).
Greek letters are encoded in brackets, and the letters are
based on Adobe's Symbol font.
Hebrew letters are encoded in brackets.

Scanned by Charles Keller with OmniPage Professional OCR software



_Alle Erfahrung ist Magic, und nur magisch erklarbar_.
NOVALIS (Friedrich von Hardenberg).

Everything possible to be believ'd is an image of truth.



THESE Excursions in the Byways of Thought were undertaken at
different times and on different occasions; consequently, the reader
may be able to detect in them inequalities of treatment.
He may feel that I have lingered too long in some byways and hurried
too rapidly through others, taking, as it were, but a general
view of the road in the latter case, whilst examining everything
that could be seen in the former with, perhaps, undue care.
As a matter of fact, how ever, all these excursions have been
undertaken with one and the same object in view, that, namely,
of understanding aright and appreciating at their true worth some
of the more curious byways along which human thought has travelled.
It is easy for the superficial thinker to dismiss much of the thought
of the past (and, indeed, of the present) as _mere_ superstition,
not worth the trouble of investigation: but it is not scientific.
There is a reason for every belief, even the most fantastic,
and it should be our object to discover this reason. How far,
if at all, the reason in any case justifies us in holding a similar
belief is, of course, another question. Some of the beliefs I
have dealt with I have treated at greater length than others,
because it seems to me that the truths of which they are the images--
vague and distorted in many cases though they be--are truths which we
have either forgotten nowadays, or are in danger of forgetting.
We moderns may, indeed, learn something from the thought of the past,
even in its most fantastic aspects. In one excursion at least,
namely, the essay on "The Cambridge Platonists," I have ventured
to deal with a higher phase--perhaps I should say the highest phase--
of the thought of a bygone age, to which the modern world may
be completely debtor.