
| A training manual in conducting a workshop in the design, construction, operation, maintenance and repair of hydrams |
| Attachments |
Session 12, Handout 12A
Hydram comparison
Scale: 1 (best) to 6 (worst)
|
CONCRETE |
MODIFIED PIPE FITTING |
FABRICATED PIPE FITTING |
MANUFACTURED HYDRAM |
WELDED STEEL |
PLASTIC* |
|
|
Cost |
1 |
4 |
3 |
6 |
5 |
2 |
|
inexpensive |
inexpensive |
inexpensive |
expensive |
moderate |
cheap |
|
|
Serviceability |
5 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
6 |
|
hard to repair the concrete |
parts are hard to repair and usually requires replacement |
sometimes difficult to get to the check valve |
parts easily made or replaced |
requires a welder |
poor |
|
|
Availability |
||||||
|
Simplicity of Design |
6 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
2 |
|
requires the greatest amount of time to construct |
parts just screw together |
most parts screw or bolt together some metal working |
most parts are cast & sometimes the rubber parts are field fabricated |
requires welding but no unique metal shapes |
easy to built requires glueing |
|
|
Ease of Transportation |
6 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
1 |
|
extremely heavy |
small and not very heavy |
small and not very heavy |
heaviest of the ferrous hydrams |
heavy & bulky |
very light |
|
|
Longevity |
3 |
5 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
6 |
|
if it does not freeze it should last as long as a mfg. Ram |
will last about 1 year |
no longevity studies done yet, but should last a long time |
history of up to 25 yr without service |
should last about as long as a mfg. ram |
will last about one month |
|
|
Efficiency |
very little difference if built properly. |
|||||
* training device only