Cover Image
close this bookChronic Energy Deficiency : Consequences and Related Issues (International Dietary Energy Consultative Group - IDECG, 1987, 201 pages)
close this folderResearch relating to energy adaptation in man
close this folder9. Adaptation to underfeeding
View the document(introductory text...)
View the document9.1. The range of adaptation
View the document9.2. The response to semistarvation

9.1. The range of adaptation

The Keys study showed that adult man responds to semistarvation over a period of several months until he re-enters a steady state on only half the usual intake: energy supply before and at the end of the 24 weeks' semistarvation was 14.5 MJ (3468 kcal) and 6.6 MJ (1570 kcal). In the last four weeks of semistarvation, weight was stable to within 0.5 kg. No other study has demonstrated adaptation so effectively. GRANDE (1958; 1964) has emphasized that adaptation is normally considered to include those adjustments in behaviour and in biochemical mechanisms which do not impair the body's function.

Table 4. The body composition and total energy exchange of semistarved and "undernourished" men


Minnesota Experiment



Control data

After 24 weeks semistarvation

New Guinea Kaul males

Body weight (kg)

70

53.2

56.3

Body fat (kg)

9.9

3.3

5.6

Fat-Free Mass (kg)

60.1

49.9

50.7

Daily Energy Output

MJ/d

14.51

6.57

9.82 ± 1.64

kcal/d

3468

1570

2347 ± 392

Basal Metabolic Rate

MJ/d

6.67

4.03

6.89

kcal/d

1595

964

1646

Estimated Specific Dynamic Action

MJ/d

1.09

0.49

0.98

kcal/d

260

118

235

Estimated Physical Activity

MJ/d

6.75

2.04

1.95

kcal/d

1613

488

466

Data for New Guinea Kaul men taken from NORGAN et al. (1974), where lying values are taken as equivalent to basal metabolic rate. Specific dynamic action calculated assuming equal to 10% energy intake and cost of physical activity calculated by difference as suggested by TAYLOR and KEYS (1945). Energy turnover presumed to be that of energy expenditure and not the lower value for intake measured by Norgan et al., but taken in Minnesota experiments to be equal to intake since this is precisely controlled and weight steady under both conditions of measurement. Most of the Minnesota data is taken from Table 181 with values for body fat taken from Table 457.