Cover Image
close this bookThe Effects of Improved Nutrition in Early Childhood : The institute of Nutrition of Central America and Panama (INCAP) Follow-up Study; Proceedings of an IDECG workshop, July 1990, Bellagio, Italy, Supplement of The Journal of Nutrition (International Dietary Energy Consultative Group - IDECG, 1990, 113 pages)
View the document(introductory text...)
View the documentForeword
close this folderHistory and design of the INCAP longitudinal study (1969-77) and its follow-up (1988-89)(¹,²)
View the document(introductory text...)
View the documentThe INCAP longitudinal study (1969-77)
View the documentThe INCAP follow-up study (1988-89)
View the documentLiterature cited
close this folderNutritional impact of supplementation in the INCAP longitudinal study: Analytic strategies and inferences(¹,²)
View the document(introductory text...)
View the documentUsing the randomized design
View the documentDose response to supplementation
View the documentCombining randomized and dose-response analyses
View the documentDifferentiating among the contributions of energy and other nutrients
View the documentConclusions
View the documentLiterature cited
close this folderAge differences in the impact of nutritional supplementation on growths(¹,²)
View the document(introductory text...)
View the documentMaterials and methods
View the documentResults
View the documentDiscussion
View the documentLiterature cited
close this folderPatterns of linear growth in rural Guatemalan adolescents and children(¹,²)
View the document(introductory text...)
View the documentMaterials and methods
View the documentResults
View the documentDiscussion
View the documentLiterature cited
close this folderNutritional supplementation during the preschool years influences body size and composition of Guatemalan adolescents(¹,²)
View the document(introductory text...)
View the documentMaterials and methods
View the documentResults
View the documentDiscussion
View the documentLiterature cited
close this folderNutritional supplementation during the preschool years and physical work capacity in adolescent and adult Guatemalans(¹,²)
View the document(introductory text...)
View the documentMaterials and methods
View the documentResults
View the documentDiscussion
View the documentLiterature cited
close this folderAge at menarche and nutritional supplementation(¹,²)
View the document(introductory text...)
View the documentMaterials and methods
View the documentResults
View the documentDiscussion
View the documentLiterature cited
close this folderEarly nutritional supplementation and skeletal maturation in Guatemalan adolescents(¹,²)
View the document(introductory text...)
View the documentMaterials and methods
View the documentDiscussion
View the documentLiterature cited
close this folderNutritional supplementation during early childhood and bone mineralization during adolescence(¹,²)
View the document(introductory text...)
View the documentMaterials and methods
View the documentResults
View the documentDiscussion
View the documentLiterature cited
close this folderNutrition in early life and the fulfillment of intellectual potential(¹,²)
View the document(introductory text...)
View the documentMaterials and methods
View the documentResults
View the documentDiscussion
View the documentLiterature cited
close this folderMalnutrition and human function: A comparison of conclusions from the INCAP and nutrition CRSP studies(¹,²)
View the document(introductory text...)
View the documentLiterature cited
close this folderResults and Implications of the INCAP follow-up study(¹,²)
View the document(introductory text...)
View the documentLiterature cited

The INCAP follow-up study (1988-89)

Objectives and design. The INCAP follow-up study of 1988-89 was a cross-sectional evaluation of former participants of the INCAP longitudinal study of 1969-77. At the time of the measurement, former participants of the longitudinal study ranged in age from 11 to 27 y. Also included in the follow-up study were subjects of the same age living in three nearby communities that INCAP had identified as potential study sites in the 1960s but which were not chosen in the end (referred to as "comparison" villages).

The main hypothesis of the follow-up study was as follows: Nutritional improvements in the critical period of gestation and the first; three years of life ultimately produce adolescents with a greater potential for leading healthy, productive lives. An equivalent, but briefer statement of the central hypothesis is that "improved nutrition in early childhood leads to enhanced human capital formation".

The richness of the longitudinal study data set allows for several ways of operationalizing improved nutrition in early childhood. Foremost, this can be done relative to the nutrition intervention by classifying subjects as belonging to Atole, Fresco or comparison villages. Also, information about daily attendance and intake of supplement permit estimates to be made of energy and nutrient intakes from supplement over any time period for all individuals. Finally, the study permits many other alternative definitions of childhood nutritional status which are not based on the nutrition intervention but that rely instead on the longitudinal information. available for children. Although not anchored in an experimental design, measures such as growth rate s or degree of stunting, by virtue of being responsive to the full range of factors which influence child health (i.e. diet, infection and their determinants), provide a wider range in nutritional status than measures of supplement. An advantage of anthropometric measures is that they are widely used as indicators of nutritional status and hence are familiar to the international nutrition community.

The central hypothesis of the follow-up study refers to "greater potential for leading healthy, productive lives" in recognition of the fact that productivity, particularly in an economic sense, was not measured as well as potential. Greater potential was operationalized as improved status in terms of measures of physical growth and body composition, maturation, work capacity, information processing, intelligence, functional competence (reading, numeracy, general knowledge) and educational achievement (Rivera et al.1992). Some productivity data were collected; labor participation and earnings were obtained for all subjects for the previous year. Nonetheless, many of the follow-up study subjects, particularly those exposed to supplement during pregnancy and the first three years of life, were too young in 1988-89 to allow for a meaningful exploration of the links between early nutrition and productivity. These aspects can be more adequately studied as the subjects become older and settled into an occupation.

A range of impact was predicted depending upon age at exposure to the nutrition intervention. Maximum effects at follow-up were predicted for subjects born from 1969-1974 (Table 3). These subjects were exposed to supplement during "critical phases" of growth and development, namely pregnancy and the first 3 y of life. The basis for this claim was the greater degree of growth retardation observed at these ages and the lack of demonstrated effect of the supplement on physical growth rates after 3 y of age (Martorell and Klein 1980; Schroeder et al. 1995).

The investigators argued to NIH, the agency that funded the research, that the follow-up study was unique because it was the first long-term, comprehensive follow-up of a nutrition intervention. Specifically, the follow-up study was expected to address whether the benefits of nutrition interventions on growth and development in early childhood persist into adolescence and beyond, to inform about effects and functions that can only be measured later in life and to contribute to understanding the importance of early growth and development for future status. Also, the investigators argued that the policy implications were clear and compelling. The following statement was included in the abstract to the first proposal submitted to NIH:

If valid, it will demonstrate that there are strong linkages among malnutrition, human capital formation and poverty which justify investments in health and nutrition as components of economic development strategies.

In designing the study, the investigators were troubled by two questions: should the study be longitudinal or cross-sectional and should the study be carried out sometime in the future when subjects reach maturity or should the study take place as soon as possible? The limitations of a cross-sectional evaluation were recognized readily. It is well known that the dynamic process of growth and maturation during adolescence can not be adequately studied through a cross-sectional design. Also, important areas such as fertility, employment history and wage earnings are difficult to collect accurately from single interviews. Although a longitudinal design would have provided better data for many outcomes, it would have increased dramatically the complexity and the cost of the study. Cost estimates, even for a cross-sectional survey, were already very high. For these reasons, a cross-sectional approach was selected.

The next question had to do with the timing of the study, when to do it? The study could proceed immediately while the subjects were adolescents or young adults or it could be postponed till most subjects were adults. The advantages of studying adults were recognized. One would be the elimination of the need to control for maturity in the analyses. By virtue of studying adults, information about truly long-term outcomes would be collected and the assessment of effects on fertility, occupation and earnings would be more definitive. Nonetheless, it was decided to proceed as soon as possible even though many subjects were still adolescents, partly to learn about effects on maturity and adolescence but more importantly, because the opportunity to carry out the study existed and it was feared that suitable conditions may not present themselves later. At this time, there was a team of interested researchers in place, enthusiasm was high and funding prospects looked reasonable.

The follow-up study, as noted, included data collection in three comparison villages chosen from six villages considered but not selected for in the longitudinal study in 1969. These villages were of interest because they were presumably similar to the Atole and Fresco and offered the theoretical possibility of shedding light on what might have occurred in the study villages in the absence of INCAP. However, it was not clear why they were not ultimately selected for the longitudinal study. Clearly, they were not felt to be the ideal choices. Still, the decision was made to include three of the previously unselected communities in the follow-up study. To reduce costs and travel time, three of the villages that were closest in distance to the four longitudinal study villages were included for study (i.e., Subinal, Las Ovejas and El Caulote).

Another issue that was carefully considered was that of migration. It was feared that to leave migrants out of the study would leave open the possibility of selection bias. On the other hand, the inclusion of migrants would complicate the logistics of data collection and increase costs. A compromise was reached. Migrants were included but only those who migrated to Guatemala City, Sanarate and El Jicaro (the last two being the provincial towns nearest to the study villages). Tracking down migrants to more dispersed areas, it was felt, would have been too costly.

Subjects studied Census data were collected between October 1 and December 1, 1987 and included general information about the family (e.g., religion, number of family members, characteristics of the dwelling) and about each family member (e.g., birth date, place of birth, migration history, education and occupation). Follow-up data collection took place between May 1988 and June 1989; the census was continuously updated throughout this period. The principal targets of the follow-up study were adolescents and young adults but other groups were studied as well as noted below.

Adolescents and young adults (follow-up cohorts). These subjects were born between January 1962 and February 1977. Records for 2393 children meeting these criteria were generated from a computer master file prepared jointly by Cornell University and INCAP in 1983. Of the 2393 children included in the master file 224 (9.4%) had died when the follow-up study began, for the most part in early childhood. The 2169 subjects alive in 1988 were the target sample in the supplemented villages, a number greater than that given in Table 3 (i.e., 1992) because it includes subjects with no anthropometric measures available from the longitudinal study. The target sample in the three comparison villages (929 individuals) were subjects who had lived in these villages between January 1969 and February 1977, according to information obtained in the 1987 census. The total target sample therefore, including subjects from supplemented and comparison villages, consisted of 3098 subjects. For simplicity, these subjects are referred to hereafter as the "follow-up cohorts". The functional domains measured in the entire follow-up cohorts included physical growth and body composition, maturation, strength, physical health and retrospective life history.

Special sample for the behavioral component. Measures of information processing, intelligence, functional competence and educational achievement were collected on all subjects born in 1966 and later. A large number of outcome variables in the behavioral area were of interest; therefore, the time demands for testing each subject were high. To reduce costs and the duration of the study, the cohorts born between 1962 and 1965 were excluded. These cohorts had received supplementation at noncritical developmental periods (ages 4-7) and thus, minimal effects were expected. Their exclusion was unfortunate because they would have been a useful contrast group to that selected.

Special work capacity sample. This is a sample of ~25% of the follow-up cohorts, excluding migrants, (539 subjects) for whom measurements of work capacity, bioelectrical impedance, bone density and physical activity were obtained. Based on the 1987 census, a stratified random sample of 25% of the follow-up cohorts was selected. Details about the selection of these subjects are provided by Haas et al. (1995).

Parents of follow-up cohorts. Anthropometric measurements of resident parents of the follow-up cohorts were obtained to better interpret growth patterns in the follow-up study cohorts.

A retrospective life history was conducted through interviews of mothers, including those who had migrated to Guatemala City and to the two provincial cities closest to the study villages (Sanarate and El Jicarol.) This information was required to complete the reproductive histories of women for the entire reproductive period and to obtain information about events that took place in the families of the follow-up cohorts between 1977 and 1988, and. that could have influenced the outcomes of interest: at adolescence. All parents were included in the study, irrespective of whether their follow-up cohort child (or children) still lived with them or had formed. an independent family.

Wives of the follow-up cohorts. All wives of the follow-up cohort males, whether or not they were former participants of the INCAP longitudinal study, were interviewed for the collection of retrospective life history information.

Heads of households. All heads of households in which at least one of the spouses or dependents was a follow-up cohort subject were interviewed to obtain information on income and wealth of the family. The sample of households included the newly formed households as well as the parents' households.

Children <5 y of age. Anthropometric measurements were obtained on all children <5 y of age in the seven villages to assess their nutritional status. These data were seen as useful for estimating the degree of secular change in the study villages through comparisons of the results with those collected earlier in children in the longitudinal study.

Tests, exams, measurements and interviews. The tests, exams, measurements and interviews made on the different groups are described briefly below. For a more detailed description of the methods and a presentation of the data forms used see Rivera (1989) and Castro and Rivera (1992).

Follow-up cohorts. The following measurements and examinations were made in the follow-up cohorts:

1) Anthropometric measurements, including height, sitting height, and weight; five body breadths: biacromial, bicristal, knee, elbow and wrist; six circumferences: head, arm, waist, hip, thigh and calf; and seven skinfolds: biceps, triceps, sub scapular, midoxillary, suprailiac, anterior thigh and medial calf. Indirect estimates of body composition (fat-free mass, percent body fat) were obtained using predictive equations from a validation study conducted at INCAP as part of the follow-up study (Conlisk et al.1992).

2) A clinical examination by a physician, including a medical history, a detailed physical examination, the measurement of blood pressure, heart and respiratory rates, body temperature and the assessment of age at menarche (status quo and history). In addition, a vision test was performed and examination for signs of vitamin A deficiency and goiter were made. Abnormalities and diagnoses of diseases were recorded and treatment was provided when needed.

3) A blood sample was collected, that was further used to determine anemia lie and iron status.

4) A hand-wrist X-ray was obtained in males and in nonpregnant females 18 y and younger. The X-rays were later used to assess skeletal age by the Tanner and Whitehouse-2 method of rating. A gravindex test on urine was performed in females 18 y and younger who had reached menarche to identify early pregnancies. Pregnant women were not exposed to X-rays.

5) Hand strength was measured for right and left hands using a dynamometer.

6) Follow-up cohorts were interviewed for the collection of retrospective life history information. Spouses of follow-up subjects also were interviewed. The female retrospective life history included information about current reproductive status, parity and gravidity; a detailed reproductive history (for every pregnancy: pregnancy outcome, newborn birth date, mortality, feeding mode at time of death, prenatal care and delivery care); breast feeding and weaning practices for any child in the last 5 y, contraceptive use, marital/union status and history; education, occupation and migration history; and the characteristics of the dwelling where the women had lived. The male life history included income, occupation, education and migration history as well as some information about accumulated wealth. In addition it contained information about marital/union status, dependents and their ages and sexes.

7) School performance. Information from school records was recorded including: age at first enrollment, grades attended, attendance rate and test scores.

Sample for the behavioral component. Full details about the behavioral data collected are given by Pollitt et al (1993). The following tests were included:

1) Information processing. This test was applied using a microcomputer. Computer programs were designed specifically for the purposes of this study. Test of simple and choice reaction time, a short memory task, and a paired associates test comprised the computerized battery.

2) Tests of functional performance. The battery included tests of literacy, numeracy and general knowledge, which were developed locally, and two standardized educational achievement tests of reading and vocabulary. The achievement tests were part of the Interamerican Series used extensively in Guatemala by faculty from the Universidad del Valle.

3) Intelligence. Intelligence was assessed with the Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices.

Work capacity sample. Physical work capacity was determined as the oxygen consumption at maximum physical e xertion (VO2max) on a motorized treadmill.

Besides the work capacity test, measurements of bioelectrical impedance and bone density, using photon absorptiometry, were made in the work capacity sample. In addition, physical activity was investigated through a questionnaire.

Parents of follow-up cohorts.

1) Anthropometric data were collected in men and women. Men: height, sitting height, weight, six circumferences (head, arm, waist, hip, thigh and calf) and five skinfolds (biceps, triceps, subscapular, anterior thigh and medial calf). Women: as detailed above for follow-up cohorts.

2) A retrospective life history was completed, identical to the one obtained by interview in follow-up subjects.

3) Heads of households. A detailed questionnaire regarding the family's income during the previous year, as well as accumulated wealth over the years was applied to heads of households. Information obtained included land tenure, crops produced, agricultural inputs (including labor, production and operation costs), time spent in agricultural jobs by crop produced and family member, production, revenue and income from agriculture and other sources and inventory of livestock ownership.

Preschool children. The following anthropometric measurements were obtained: length, crown-rump length, weight, knee breadth, three circumferences (head, arm and calf) and five skinfolds (biceps, triceps, subscapular, midaxillary and medial calf).

Organization and logistics of data collection. Six working teams conducted the tests, exams, measurements and interviews: two focused on the follow-up cohorts, one on parents of the follow-up cohorts, one on children's anthropometry, one on work capacity and one on migrants. Details about the composition of these teams and about coordination and supervision of their work are given in Rivera, Martorell and Castro (1992).

Logistics of data collection. Rotation of teams. The data collection teams were rotated among villages. Also, data collection in each village was staggered over the study to include both rainy and dry seasons.

Program of appointments for follow-up cohorts. The order in which subjects were measured was random. Subjects were scheduled to complete all tests, measurements and interviews in three visits but most subjects chose to complete them in 2 d and in some cases, in 1 d.

Informed consent was followed. When possible, the behavioral tests were done before the medical examination, which involved blood collection, because this procedure caused anxiety in some subjects. When possible, the behavioral tests were spread across visits to avoid fatigue.

Average durations of testing were as follows: Anthropometric measurements, hand-wrist X-rays and hand strength tests (25 min), medical examination and collection of urine and blood samples (25 min), functional competence and intelligence tests (160 min) and life history interview (20 min). In general, subjects tolerated the time involvement in the study better than expected.

Some subjects (3.6% of participants) refused to visit the testing center but were willing to be measured at home where all but X-rays and information processing tests could be completed. In contrast, most of the income and wealth interviews of heads of households and a large number of life history interviews of mothers and anthropometric measurements of parents of follow-up cohorts were made at home, because these subjects had less time to attend the centers.

The teams worked ~8 h/d but schedules were flexible to accommodate the preferred hours of participation of the subjects in each village and season. In all the villages, the teams had to work some weekends to allow for participation of subjects who worked in the fields during weekdays until late in the afternoon, subjects who worked out of the villages and returned during the weekends and migrants who visited their families during the weekends.

Training, supervision and data flow. Training. Training took ~2 mo and rigorous standardization exercises were held in all areas. Technical errors of measurement in anthropometry were equal or better than those reported in the literature (Pareja et al. 1989). For life history and income and wealth questionnaires as well as for functional performance tests, the percent agreement among interviewers usually exceeded 95%. Detailed results of the standardization procedures are given elsewhere (Rivera 1989; Castro and Rivera 1992).

Supervision and quality control. Supervision was continuous. All supervisors spent ³ 2 or 3 d/wk in the field, providing direct supervision to field workers and examining and correcting data collection forms.

Ranges of permissible values in anthropometry were used to detect outliers; then, either obvious errors were corrected or subjects were reexamined. Errors in the behavioral area, the life history and the income and wealth interviews were detected through the review of data forms. In the work capacity area, the supervisors participated directly in data collection. After each test, the team reviewed the results and in this manner detected and corrected obvious errors.

Repeated measurements were made in ~10% of cases in anthropometry and in ~4% of cases in other areas. Analyses of these data are reported in the methods sections of papers in this volume.

Data flow, entry, verification and cleaning. Data were key punched twice at the INCAP computer center. The data then were cleaned using valid ranges of values and consistency checks across variables to detect errors and outliers. Values suspected to be incorrect were sent back to the field where the supervisor of each area corrected coding errors. For anthropometry and the life history questionnaires, subjects were reexamined whenever errors other than coding were found.

Primary health care activities. Efforts to strengthen the primary health care in each of the villages were implemented in coordination with the Ministry of Health.

A physician, hired by INCAP, instructed the nurses in several areas, especially the government's child survival program. He visited each village once a week to examine cases referred to him by the nurses as well as to attend to anyone in the village wishing to see him. Drugs and medicines were donated to the clinics to make up for the unpredictability of government supplies. In the two villages lacking clinics, INCAP established clinics in buildings donated by the community and hired nurses to staff them. At the end of the study, all medical equipment in the new clinics was donated to the communities.

Minimal dental services were provided through an arrangement with the University of San Carlos' dental school.

Coverage rate. Coverage is defined as the rate "participants/target sample." Participants being subjects for whom data were available for at least one study area (Tables 5-7).

Table 5 shows rates of coverage by village and type of village. Overall coverage was 7l. 7% with rates being slightly greater for supplemented villages (72.6%) than for comparison villages (69.5%). Coverage rates did not differ significantly between Atole and Fresco villages.

Overall coverage rates were greater for females (74.5%) than for males (68.9%); this pattern was similar in supplemented (females: 799/1060 = 75.4% and males: 775/1109 = 69.9%) and comparison villages (females: 343/473 = 72.5% and males: 303/456 = 66.4%).

TABLE 5 Overall coverage in the follow-up cohorts

Village type

T

P

%

Fresco¹

Santo Domingo

594

411

69.2

Espíritu Santo

423

322

76.1

Atole²

Conacaste

675

488

72.3

San Juan

477

353

74.0

Supplemented Combined

2159

1574

72.6

Comparison

Subinal

238

165

69.3

Las Ovejas

386

280

72.5

El Caulote

305

201

65.9

Comparison Combined

929

646

69.5

ALL VILLAGES

3098

2220

71.7

¹ Large Fresco village, Santo Domingo; small Fresco village, Espiritu Santo.
² Large Atole village, Conacaste; small atole village, San Juan; T. target sample; P. participants; % = coverage.

TABLE 6 Coverage in the follow-up cohorts by migration status

Village type

Migrants

Nonmigrants


T

P

%

T

P

%

Fresco¹

Santo Domingo

212

79

37.3

382

332

86.9

Espiritu Santo

138

66

47.8

285

256

89.8

Atole²

Conacaste

201

80

39.8

474

408

86.1

San Juan

176

71

40.3

301

282

93.7

Supplemented Combined

727

296

40.7

1442

1278

88.6

Comparison

Subinal

61

28

45.9

177

137

77.4

Las Ovejas

98

44

44.9

288

236

81.9

El Caulote

76

33

43.4

229

168

73.4

Comparison Combined

235

105

44.7

694

541

78.0

ALL VILLAGES

962

401

41.7

2136

1819

85.2

¹ Large Fresco village, Santo Domingo; small Fresco village, Espiritu Santo.
² Large Atole village, Conacaste; small Atole village, San Juan; T. target sample; P. participants; %, coverage.

Table 6 presents coverage rates by migration status. Coverage rates differed between supplemented and comparison villages; among nonmigrant subjects, coverage rates were ~10% greater in supplemented (88.6%) than in comparison villages (78.0%.). This is probably the result of the good rapport built by INCAP during the 9 y of the longitudinal study. On the other hand, coverage for migrants was slightly less in supplemented (40.7%) than comparison villages (44.7%). This may be due to differences in how the target sample was defined in supplemented and comparison villages. The target sample of migrants in the comparison villages was identified using information available in the 1987 census. Therefore, only adolescent migrants whose families were still living in the villages at the time of the follow-up census were selected. In contrast, in the supplemented villages, follow-up cohorts whose entire families had migrated before the beginning of the follow-up study also were selected, using records from the longitudinal study. Some of these migrant families were located using information provided by neighbors and relatives; however, as a result of the absence of parents or close relatives, follow-up cohorts belonging to these families were much more difficult to locate than migrants whose families were still living in the villages.

Coverage rates for migrants were overall much lower than those for nonmigrants because of the difficulty of locating migrants and because data collection in migrants was restricted to those living in Guatemala City and two provincial cities. The decision to focus on these locations was based on resource restrictions and the fact that information available at the beginning of the study indicated that ~64% of the subjects for whom locations were known lived in one of these three cities. Coverage for migrants known to have moved to these three cities was 62%. For the entire migrant sample, coverage was 42% (Table 6).

Coverage rates for females were greater in both migrants and nonmigrants. In migrants, coverage rates were 45.6% and 36.9% for females and males respectively; these patterns were similar in supplemented (females: 176/394 = 44.75% and males: 120/333 = 36.0%) and comparison villages (females: 65/134 = 48.5% and males: 40/101 = 39.6%). In nonmigrants, coverage for females was 89.7% and for males 81.2%. Coverage rates were greater in females in supplemented villages (females: 623/666 = 93.5% and males: 655/776 = 84.4%) as well as in comparison villages (females:278/339=82.0% and males:263/255=74.1%).

TABLE 7 Percent coverage in the follow-up exhorts by birth cohorts and gender

Cohorts¹ Village type

Females

Males


I

II

III

IV

I

II

III

IV

Fresco²

Santo Domingo

84.1

73.0

56.4

68.8

82.3

70.9

61.5

50.0

Espíritu Santo

90.4

74.4

65.9

69.2

87.5

77.3

55.8

62.1

Atole³

Conacaste

84.8

74.1

79.4

81.4

87.5

65.7

55.8

53.8

San Juan

76.3

79.0

67.9

67.9

90.8

74.0

58.5

57.1

Supplemented Combined

83.8

75.1

67.9

73.1

87.1

71.2

60.3

54.5

Comparison

Subinal

89.2

83.3

54.2

58.3

90.9

67.4

46.7

42.9

Las Ovejas

83.8

81.2

64.7

66.0

85.7

81.4

61.9

49.0

El Caulote

87.8

76.6

55.2

47.6

91.7

70.6

38.5

42.4

Comparison Combined

87.0

80.4

58.6

57.5

88.8

73.7

51.8

45.5

ALL VILLAGES

84.8

76.6

65.2

67.5

87.6

71.9

57.9

51.2

¹ See Table 3 for cohort definitions. Values are percentages.
² Large Fresco village, Santo Domingo; small Fresco village, Espíritu Santo.
³ Large Atole village, Conacaste; small Atole village, San Juan.

Subjects were classified into four birth cohorts according to ages of exposure to supplementation (Table 3). Table 7 presents coverage rates by cohort and village. In general, Cohort I has the highest coverage rates, followed by Cohort II and finally by Cohorts III and IV. Younger subjects may have had more time to participate in the various tests and interviews than older subjects.

Table 8 presents coverage rates for the different study domains by village type. Coverage rates were ~ 70% for most domains. The low coverage for blood collection deserves comment. Interviews of subjects who had refused to participate and of their families revealed that anxiety related to blood collection was one of the principal reasons for nonparticipation. Some subjects felt that the very small amount of blood collected (5 mL) was very large relative to the total blood volume in an adult. In one village, there were rumors that the blood was being sold. To remedy the situation, subjects were informed that blood collection was not essential for participation in the rest of the tests, measurements and interviews. In addition, subjects were reminded that blood samples also were used for the diagnosis of anemia, with treatment provided when necessary. Subsequently the refusal rate declined, though refusals to provide a blood sample among participants in the study remained high.

Table 8 also presents coverage rates for the different study domains in the comparison villages. Coverage rates were slightly less than found in the supplemented villages, but follow the same patterns. For the work capacity test, more subjects than originally planned were examined in comparison villages (see Haas et al. 1995).

Coverage rates for anthropometric measurements of parents of the follow-up sample was 82.4%, with no difference between supplemented (809/979 = 82.6%) and comparison villages (386/472 = 81.8%). Similar coverage rates were obtained for the life history of mothers of the follow-up samples (82.7%), with similar coverage rates for supplemented (452/543 = 83.2%) and comparison villages (207/253 = 81.8%). In contrast, coverage of the income and wealth questionnaire applied to heads of households was lower (62.0%), with rates being similar in supplemented (62.5%) and comparison villages (60.7%). The low coverage rates for the income and wealth interviews were due in part to the long time required to obtain the information and the fact that most of the heads of households worked in agriculture and were away during most of the day.

TABLE 8 Coverage rates by study domain and village type for the follow-up cohorts

Study area

Supplemented villages

Comparison villages


T

P

%

T

P

%

Anthropometry

2169

1554

71.7

929

633

68.1

Medical Exam

2169

1543

71.1

929

630

67.8

Hand-wrist x-rays

1149

920

80.1

459

337

73.4

Blood sample

2169

1196

55.1

929

425

45.7

Psychology tests Functional competence and intelligence

1897

1367

72.1

766

532

69.5

Information processing

1897

1331

70.2

766

521

68.0

Life history

Males

1109

742

66.9

456

282

61.8

Females

1060

730

68.9

473

311

65.8

Work capacity subsample

388

361

93.0

152

178

100.0¹

T. target sample; P. participants, %, coverage.
¹ More subjects were examined than originally planned.

Concluding remarks

Full details about design and methods, such as contained in this article, are often not readily available in the literature. The INCAP longitudinal and follow-up studies are among the most important sources of information from developing countries about child growth, development and nutrition and it is likely that there will be continued analyses of these data for years to come. It is important to have a faithful record of the design, objectives, methods and procedures, particularly for the benefit of analysts who may not have been directly involved with the studies.