Cover Image
close this bookGhana: A Baseline Study of the Teacher Education System (CIE, 2000, 67 p.)
close this folderChapter 1: Basic Education in Ghana: An Overview
View the document1.1 Introduction
View the document1.2 National Indicators
View the document1.3 Recent History of the Basic Education System
View the document1.4 Structure and Characteristics of Basic Education
View the document1.5 Participation in Basic Education
View the document1.6 Pupil-Teacher Ratios
View the document1.7 The Quality of Basic Education
View the document1.8 Education Expenditure
View the document1.9 Teachers
View the document1.10 Conclusion

1.9 Teachers

The promotion of quality teaching and learning has important implications for restructuring the current system of initial teacher education in Ghana. Improved quality in teaching and learning, with subsequent increased levels of achievement at the basic school level, calls for a certain kind of teacher who is capable of delivering effectively revised school curricula and promoting efficient learning in schools. The MOE identified inadequate numbers of trained and qualified teachers, and ineffective initial teacher training provided by the TTCs, as key factors contributing to the poor level of pupil achievement.8 According to the MOE (1993:23),

[The TTCs] are inefficient in producing effective teachers since the trainees and the tutors have so little exposure to actual schools and classrooms, and academic content is taught and tested above practical teaching methodology. The college curriculum also does not differentiate sufficiently between primary and JSS methodology.

8 The MOE (1994:16-17) argues that although private schools in Accra and Kumasi have both higher pupil-ratios (averaging over 40:1), and only 25 per cent trained teachers, pupils in these private schools perform better than their counterparts in the public schools. This argument, however, appears based on raw test results, unadjusted for the socio-economic background of pupils and other school factors.

Some of the practices in training colleges that are believed to have contributed to the poor performance of trained teachers in schools with an attendant effect on the academic performances of pupils are summarised as follows:

· Emphasis on academic content in the training programme above training in practical teaching.

· Lack of exposure to actual schools and work in the classrooms.

· Inadequate of actual training in classroom methodology.

· Lack of content and opportunity for the education and training of teachers to prepare them for handling the new directions and management issues which are some of the outcomes of the education reform programme, e.g. teaching large classes and multi-grade teaching.

Another dimension of the problem of quality of teaching and learning is the proportion of untrained teachers (defined as those teachers who have not completed a pre-service training course at a Teacher Training College) in basic schools. In 1996 the number of teachers at the public primary level was 62,634 and 38,016 in public junior secondary schools (MOE, 1999:6).

Table 1.14: Total and percentage of trained and untrained teachers at primary level (public schools), 1986-94

year

total

trained

untrained

pupil-teacher ratio

pupil-trained teacher ratio



total

%

total

%



1986/87

64,359

35,912

55.8

28,447

44.2

22.8

40.9

1987/88

63,367

36,689

57.9

26,678

42.1

23.3

40.2

1988/89

62,670

37,790

60.3

24,880

39.7

25.5

42.3

1989/90

62,859

41,738

66.4

21,121

33.6

27.1

40.8

1990/91

62,823

41,526

66.1

21,297

33.9

28.7

43.4

1991/92

64,035

46,169

72.1

17,866

27.9

28.1

39.0

1993/94

62,614

47,796

76.3

14,845

23.6

-

-

1995/96

60,607

52,690

86.9

7,917

13.1

-

-

Source: MOE 1994; MOE 1995; TED 1997

Notes:

1) Trained teachers are defined as those teachers who received initial training from a TTC.

2) The total number of untrained teachers includes National Service Personnel working as teachers.

3) In 1991, of the 62,823 teachers in service, 8.8 per cent (5,530) were ‘detached’, i.e. not teaching because they were in administrative posts or on study leave. In 1992, however, a Government policy was introduced to move trained teachers working in administrative posts back into the classroom (Konadu, 1994:39)

Table 1.15: Total and percentage of trained and untrained teachers at JSS level (public schools), 1986-96

year

total

trained

untrained

pupil-teacher ratio

pupil-trained teacher ratio



total

%

total

%



1986/87

33,443

21,805

65.2

11,638

34.8

18.6

28.5

1987/88

40,528

27,275

67.3

13,253

22.7

15.1

22.4

1988/89

34,584

24,831

71.8

9,753

28.2

17.6

24.5

1989/90

35,262

22,885

64.9

12,377

35.1

17.7

27.3

1990/91

30,708

23,307

75.9

7,401

24.1

18.5

24.4

1991/92

33,351

23,979

71.9

9,372

28.1

17.7

24.6

1992/93

25,386

23,558

92.8

1,828

7.2

-

-

1995/96

29,669

25,782

86.9

3,887

13.1

-

-

Source: MOE 1994; TED 1997

Note: At the time of writing no reference could be found which details the sharp increase of 1992/93 in the number of trained JSS teachers as a percentage of all JSS teachers. It is apparent from the absolute totals, however, that this was due to the sharp drop in the number of untrained JSS teachers in the system rather than a substantial influx of trained JSS teachers.

Total numbers of trained and untrained teachers at the primary and JSS levels are presented in Tables 1.14 and 1.15. In 1989, 66 per cent of primary school teachers were trained, while for the JSS level, the figure was 65 per cent. By 1995, these figures had risen to 87 and 90 per cent, respectively. In line with the objectives of the 1987 education reforms, the total number of untrained teachers at the basic level has steadily decreased, but the latest figures for 1995 suggest that the proportion of untrained teachers remains significant at 13 per cent.

Table 1.14 shows that while the pupil-teacher ratio at the primary level steadily increased from 23:1 in 1986/87 to 28:1 in 1991/92, the pupil-trained teacher ratio has remained fairly constant, fluctuating around 40:1. Thus by 1991/92, although a primary teacher was more likely to be trained, on average he or she taught larger classes. Data presented in Table 1.15 indicates that at the JSS level the pupil-teacher ratio fell from 18.6 in 1986/87 to 17.7 by 1991/92, and the pupil-trained teacher ratio fell from 28.5 to 24.6. By 1991/92, JSS teachers were more likely to be trained and teach fewer pupils. Recent data from MOE estimates pupil-teacher ratios at the primary and JSS levels as 32.4 and 18.3, respectively for 1996 (MOE, 1999:6).

Konadu (1994:36) notes that in 1990/91, the Ghana Education Service (GES) deployed 4,727 newly qualified teachers (NQTs) to posts in primary and JSS schools. In 1991/92, 9183 NQTs were deployed. Using these figures together with data presented in Tables 1.14 and 1.15, the rate of attrition among trained teachers for the academic years 1990/91 and 1991/92 is calculated as 7.0 per cent and 6 per cent, respectively.9 Reports suggest the rate of annual trained teacher attrition is high due to inadequate remuneration, lack of promotional prospects, and low social status of teaching (Bame, 1991; World Bank, 1996:5). No recent data is available on the annual rate of teacher attrition. Research needs to be carried out to find out how long newly trained teachers stay in the profession and why those who choose to leave do so (e.g. relatively low status and/or remuneration, retirement, HIV/AIDS). These are issues requiring further exploration through policy research to inform teacher-posting policy and thereby ensure that projections of teacher requirements can be realistically met.

9 Data on NQT deployment disaggregated by level of schooling, i.e. primary and JSS, were not available at the time of writing.

Table 1.16 presents data showing the numbers of trained and untrained teachers in primary schools across the ten regions of Ghana in 1993. The more remote and disadvantaged regions of Western, Brong-Ahafo and Northern, have the highest proportion of untrained to trained teachers at the primary level.10 It is clear that significant regional disparities exist. These are partly due to absolute resource limitations but can be attributed largely to the process of resource distribution which favours the more economically advantaged areas of the country (World Bank, 1996:8). The problem is exacerbated by the significant proportion of trained teachers that refuse postings to the more economically deprived areas of the country. Officials in the Teacher Education Directorate (TED) of the MOE point out that there is evidence that some urban districts have more trained teachers than they require, and yet in each year some of these urban districts declare shortages in teachers.

10 Data on the proportion of trained to untrained JSS teachers by region were not available.

Table 1.16: Distribution of trained and untrained teachers at primary level (public schools) by region, 1993/94

region

trained

untrained

total


number

%

number

%


Ashanti

8,543

81.1

1,993

18.9

10,536

Brong Ahafo

4,750

62.2

2,885

37.8

7,635

Central

4,456

74.1

1,557

25.9

6,013

Eastern

8,377

79.5

2,164

20.5

10,541

Gt. Accra

4,541

95.8

199

4.2

4,740

Northern

3,366

66.1

1,724

33.9

5,090

Upper East

1,622

86.8

247

13.2

1,869

Upper West

1,552

97.8

35

2.2

1,587

Volta

6,376

86.5

991

13.5

7,367

Western

4,186

57.8

3,050

42.2

7,236

Total

47,769

76.3

14,845

23.7

62,614

Source: adapted from MOE 1995:14

Table 1.17 shows that there are districts in the country where up to 75 per cent of teachers remain untrained.

Table 1.17: Trained Teachers Characteristics by Neediest Districts

District

% of Total

Juabesobia

25.38

Tolon-Gunbugu

28.33

Afram Plains

32.26

Sene

38.89

Savelugunan

39.50

Twifu-Heman

42.30

East Gonja

43.63

Mpohor Wassa

45.27

Wassa-Amenfi

46.34

Asunafo

46.61

Atebubu

46.69

Sefwi-Wiaso

48.53

Zabuzugutatale

49.21

Adansi East

49.25

Amansie West

49.78

Source: Extracted from World Bank Report, 1996

It is interesting to note that private schools often have the least number of trained teachers and yet from the PREP CRT results such schools out-perform their counterparts in the public schools. Available statistics from the PBME Division of the Ministry of Education show that in 1993, for example, the percentage of trained teachers in the public primary schools was 73.3 per cent, while in the private primary schools the percentage of trained teachers was only 28.6 per cent. This obviously raises questions about the policy of increasing trained teachers in schools with the aim to promote greater achievements in pupil learning outcomes. School information data collected as part of the MOE/PREP criterion-referenced tests administration shows that the private schools have a clear advantage over the public schools in the following respects:

· Greater control and supervision of teachers
· Effective School Management Board
· Interest of parents in what their children learn
· Open days which bring teachers, parents and children together
· Availability of proportionately more instructional materials
(MOE/PREP 1996:28)

Thus, it would appear that effective school management systems, community participation in school development and increased instructional materials in schools are crucial for schools to enhance pupil learning outcomes, and that merely increasing the percentage of trained teachers without such supportive structures will not yield the desired results.

Nevertheless, the general lack of correspondence between trained teacher availability in schools and pupil performance as revealed by the CRT results raises questions about the quality of teachers and their ability to effect improvements in pupil learning. If in real terms the contribution from their training is minimal then it is necessary to re-examine the training curriculum of TTCs to make it perhaps more responsive to the current problems of pupil learning achievement, lack of instructional materials and ineffective school management systems. Besides, it will inform the policy of replacing ‘untrained’ teachers with trained ones and whether time and money should be spent on training the ‘untrained’ or providing the necessary management support system for all categories of teachers in schools to deliver quality learning. Ultimately, this would have important implications for the policy of teacher demand and supply.