Cover Image
close this bookWho Becomes a Primary School Teacher in Lesotho: Characteristics and Experiences of the DEP Student Teachers upon Entry into NTTC (CIE, 2002, 49 p.)
close this folderChapter 3: Data Analysis And Interpretation
View the document(introduction...)
View the document3.1 Age
View the document3.2 Gender
View the document3.3 Denominational Affiliation
View the document3.4 Occupation and Educational Qualification of Parents of Student Teachers
View the document3.5 Location of Schools and Years of Attendance of Primary school
View the document3.6 Number of years in School
View the document3.7 Performance at Post-Primary School
View the document3.8 Teaching Experience
View the document3.9 Perceptions of Student teachers about primary schooling
View the document3.10 Images of primary school teachers
View the document3.11 Future Plans and Expectations
View the document3.12 Life in the College
View the document3.13 Becoming a teacher
View the document3.14 Challenges Facing the Teaching Profession and Possible Changes in Education
View the document3.15 Views about teaching and related issues

3.7 Performance at Post-Primary School

3.7.1 Performance in English

It would seem that the student teachers who participated in this study did not do well in English at either JC or COSC, with none reporting A grades. Performance in English at JC was slightly better than at COSC for most student teachers. As indicated in Tables 5 and 6, 38% got good passes (6% B, 32% C) at JC, but the figure was lower (3% each for B and C) at COSC. While at JC 30% of those surveyed got an E or below, at COSC 62% had E or below.

3.7.2 Performance in Mathematics

In Maths, the range is slightly wider, but the overall results are worse. At JC, one student had an A grade, and 22% were in the B/C bracket, while just over half got E or below, the Es forming the largest single group. By comparison, at COSC there were no As, 14% got B/C, and two-thirds got E or below, most of these being Fs.

3.7.3 Performance in Science

Performance in Science at both exams was rather better, but still indicates weaknesses at COSC. In JC, 4% of students got an A, 10% a B, and 29% a C, with less than a third (30%) getting E or below. At COSC there were no As, though 13% got B, 20% C, and 39% had E or below.

Table 5: Pass symbols at JC in English, Mathematics and Science Examination

Value

English

Mathematics

Science


Frequency

Percent

Frequency

Percent

Frequency

Percent

F

7

7.8%

19

21.1%

14

15.6%

E

20

22.2%

28

31.1%

13

14.4%

D

25

27.8%

19

21.1%

21

23.3%

C

29

32.2%

12

13.3%

26

28.9%

B

5

5.6%

8

6.9%

9

10.0%

A

0

0%

1

1.1%

4

4.4%

No response

4

4.4%

1

1.1%



Total

90

100.0%

90

100.0%

90

100.0%

The average COSC results which the College uses in admitting candidates into the Diploma programme show that the most students have D grades or below in the core subjects. Using these symbols, it becomes difficult to accept the notion that the calibre of student teachers for the new diploma programme is better than those who entered the old PTC programme.

Table 6: Pass symbol at COSC in English, Mathematics and Science Examination

Value

English

Mathematics

Science


Frequency

Percent

Frequency

Percent

Frequency

Percent

F

18

20.0%

43

47.8%

23

25.6%

E

38

42.2%

16

17.8%

12

13.3%

D

25

27.8%

14

15.5%

22

24.4%

C

3

3.3%

12

13.3%

18

20.0%

B

3

3.3%

1

1.1%

12

13.3%

No response

3

3.3%

4

4.4%

3

3.3%

Total

90

100.0%

90

100.0%

90

100.0%