| TE WANANGA,
korero whakahe, koia ahau i whai kupu ai. He kupu
naku mo te iwi e noho ana i te pito ki raro atu o
Nepia he mea naku, e kore a Kapene Morihi e tu
hei mea mo taua wahi, no te mea i whakahe aia ki
te pooti ma te Maori, i te mea hoki i pai nga iwi o
Papati Pei ki taua pooti. E mea ana nga Pakeha o
taua wahi, he nui no te whenua a te Maori i taua
takiwa, koia te pooti ma ratou i tika ai, a na te Kau-
nihe Pokeha o Kihipene i mea kia tuhituhia nga ingoa
o te Maori ki te pukapuka pooti a te Pakeha, a na to
Kaunihera i utu taua mahi. A kahore kau he kupu
whakahe a nga Pakeha o reira ki taua mahi a taua
Kaunihera mo te Maori kia pooti, a i te wa i kiia ai e
ahua he ana te tuhituhi o etahi o aua pukapuka pooti,
he mea tono taua mahi kia mahia tikatia. Koia te
ahua he o te pooti o Kapene Morihi, i te mea e tino
mea ana te Pakeha kia pooti pu ano te Maori o taua
takiwa o Kihipene, i te mea he nui noa atu te Maori o
reira, a ko te Pakeka i ouou. A i enei ra. ka titiro
atu te tini kia Te Rarena Honiana, he mea hoki koia
e aro mai ana ki te Maori, he mea hoki e kaha ana
tena teina ki te mahi i nga mahi o te Kaunihera o
Kihipene, a waiho me titiro e tatou te whakaaro a te
Paremata e he ranei i a ratou te tono e tono nei te
Maori mo taua pooti.
NA TANGATA NOHO I PAPATI PEI.
Oketopa 7.
MAORI VOTING.
To the Editor of the New Zealander.
Sir,So much has been said and written with re-
gard to the clause in the Electoral Bill providing: the
voting qualification of the Maoris, that I would net
encumber your columns with any observations of
mine were it not that your contemporary, the N. Z.
Times, in this morning's issue, has announced its in-
tention of again referring to the question. The
debate in the Upper House will, I believe, be re-
sumed on Tuesday evening. I may therefore be per-
mitted to say a word or two before the division takes
place, to show the opinion of the Europeans in one of
the largest districts in the colony that would be
affected by the Maori vote. I allude to that part of
the country north of Napier and south of Tauranga,
which includes the county of Cook, as well as a cer-
tain area outside of the County boundary. It will be
remembered, should Captain Morris ever again contest
the district he now represents (?), that he voted
against the extension of the franchise to Maoris whose
qualification was the ownership of land held under
memorial of ownership. I merely mention this to
show that Captain Morris voted against what the
people of Poverty Bay represented locally by the
County Council of Cook and the Borough Council of
Gisborne) have expressly declared themselves in favor
of. These two local bodies, after consideration, ar-
rived at the conclusion that it was just and fair to the
Maoris, who held in the aggregate over 2,000,000
acres in that district under memorial of ownership,
that they should have the right to vote for the Euro-
pean representative. It was deemed advantageous to
the district that that right should be extended to all
Natives who were not debarred by age or sex, and
who held land under memorial of ownership. Did
then those two local bodies point out to Captain
Morris that it would be wrong to endorse by a clause
in the Electoral Bill a right that had been already
conferred on the aboriginals? No. The County
Council of Cook and the Borough Council of Gisborne
voted out of the rates paid by the people a consider-
able sum, to pay a person to traverse the whole dis-
trict, and place upon the Electoral Roll every eligible
Native. To further facilitate the carrying out of this
object over a thousand voting papers iti the Maori
language were printed and left at every Native settle-
ment. Of the many newspapers published in that
district not a single one raised its voice to say that it
was unjust that such a power should be given to the .
Natives. No word was said of " disreputable Pakeha
Maoris manipulating elections. On the contrary,
when a few of the voting papers through some slight
informality were objected to by the Returning Officer,
Mr. Hopkins Clarke, the newspapers grumbled at
frivolous objections having been made, and in leading
articles almost implored the people to attend
Revision Court and set matters right. Yet in the
face of all this calm and deliberate action on the part.
of the Europeans and the press, in a district where the
Maori population is far in excess of the European
population, the hon. gentleman who should represent
that district in Parliament voted that effect should
not be given to what his constituents had paid to have
performed. In the Lower House the question is dis-
posed of, so nothing more need be said of the quasi
represervative of the East Coast.
The settlers now naturally look to the Hon. Randall
Johnson, who it is understood, takes an interest in
the welfare of that district, in the hope of better
things. The Chairman of the County of Cook, that
honorable Councillor's brother, performed his part
well in the interest of the district It now remains
to be seen whether or not the Parliament of the
country has drifted into such an anomalous state that
the legislators in both Houses should vote against the
declared wishes of the people they should represent.
I am &c.
POVERTY BAY SETTLER
October 7.
The New Zealander, commenting on the above,
says : "We publish in another column, a letter signed
a ' Poverty Bay Settler" with regard the Maori |