close this bookVolume 8: No. 24.2
View the documentAI news
View the documentApple news
View the documentApplied jobs (in our CAJ 8.24 digest this week)
View the documentMultimedia resources
View the documentVirtual reality resources
View the documentSpeech recognition

Matt Ginsberg's GIB bridge program lost to Zia and Rosenberg in tournament play by 6.3 IMPs over 14 boards. (International master points?) Ginsberg says that "at least on this day, GIB deserved to be playing at the same table" with two of the world's best bridge players. For equal players, "the expected difference after 14 deals would be 20.6 IMPs, simply because bridge is a stochastic game." (The expected absolute difference between A and B is different from the expected difference of A over B or of B over A, which would be zero.) GIB has also been playing in the world computer championships, where it defeated Bridge Baron by 83 IMPs in 48 deals (with other rounds yet to play). In earlier play GIB was 6-0, ahead of Q-Plus (4-2), Bridge Baron (4-2), Micro Bridge (3-3), and three other programs. [, comp.ai and rec.games.bridge, 28Jul98.]

SexNet is a neural network trained to guess the gender of passport-style photographs (excluding hair, jewelry, and clothing). A NIPS3 article by Golomb, Lawrence, and Sejnowski says that SexNet achieved an accuracy of 91.9% vs. human performance of 88.4%. [Will Dwinnell <76743.1740@compuserve.com>, comp.ai.games, 30Jul98.] (I don't know the details, but I'm suspicious. If the training and tests sets had a sex-correlated difference of any sort, it could easily explain such results. Suppose two different camera/lighting stations were involved, for instance; a neural network could easily spot a slight blur or 1% difference in illumination, but a human could not. Women's makeup could have a similar effect, as could ethnic differences or any consistent difference in cropping of the hair, jewelry, and clothes. Even if the system is accurate, it might be easily confused by variable lighting or imaging conditions, or fooled by anyone wearing unusual makeup. Still, this sounds like a promising start.)

The Los Angeles Association for Computing Machinery Technical Activity Committee on Artificial Intelligence (TACART) is shutting down in Jun98, after years of seminar meetings. There just aren't enough volunteers to keep it going. [L. Andrew Campbell , comp.ai, 29Jul98.]