| Volume 5: No. 09 |
Abstracts of papers in Neural Processing Letters are now
available on Warren L. Kovach maintains a WWW page for shareware
and public-domain statistical and data analysis software,
including his own DOS/Windows programs MVSP and Oriana.
"NNs are used almost exclusively for prediction rather than
explanation or hypothesis testing. The results are often
difficult to interpret due to the nonlinearities and high
dimensionalities. If you want interpretable results, you might
prefer projection pursuit regression or additive models.
However, there are NN analogs of projection pursuit regression
and additive models, as well as principal components and maximum
redundancy analysis, so your options in NNs are quite broad. ...
You might use an MLP, rather than _linear_ regression, if you have
reason to expect nonlinear relationships. You might use a
flexible nonlinear model such as an MLP, rather than a specific
parametric nonlinear model, if you have no prior knowledge from
which to construct a specific parametric model. You might use an
MLP, rather than kernel or k-nearest-neighbor regression, if you
have many predictors, some of which are likely to be irrelevant.
You might use an MLP, rather than projection pursuit regression
or LOESS, if you want a simple formula for rapidly computing
predicted values. ... One minor problem is that NNs are usually
ill-conditioned or outright singular, but one can deal with this
by looking at various diagnostics for ill-conditioning and taking
various types of remedial action." -- Warren S. Sarle
(saswss@unx.sas.com), sci.stat.consult, 11/21/94.
"The other unique element in neural nets is the idea of
simultaneously selecting all basis elements using backpropagation.
My first impression of this methods was that it was bound to fail
by winding up in poor local minima. This does not seem to happen
and the why is mysterious." -- Breiman, reviewing B. Cheng and
D. Titterington, "Neural networks: a review from a statistical
perspective," Statistical Science (1 994). [William Verkooijen
(william@kub.nl), comp.ai.neural-nets, 11/21/94.]
Students of quantitative uncertainty may want the newly
updated 20-page "Guidelines for Evaluating and Expressing
the Uncertainty of NIST Measurement Results, TN 1297."
Free from NIST Calibration Program, A104 Bldg. 411, Gaithersburg,
MD 20899-0001; (301) 975-2002, (301) 926-2884 Fax. ($17.50
from NTIS, #PB 95-143087.) [Linda Joy Neural-network conferences, workshops, and calls for papers
are listed on the IDIAP neural network home page,