Silicon Valley women replied to the Business Week article
about the shortage of dateable women, saying that it can be
hard to find a good man if you're not willing to advertise
in the newspaper, hang out in bars and nightclubs, or sign up
for dating services -- especially for 30+ and 40+ women
who aren't shaped like movie stars. The perfect woman-next-door
may be living next door or working in the next department,
but chances to meet are few. Religious groups are trying
to provide channels: Congregation Kol Emeth (Palo Alto)
recently hosted a Shabbat dinner for about 75 single women
and 25 single men. See
for their traditional matchmaking (Shadchan) service for
Silicon Valley Jews. [BW, 27Mar00, p. 15.]
The median home in Silicon Valley now costs $421K, up 65%
in five years. Only 29% of Valley families can afford that.
Blue collar workers earning $15/hour or less are often sharing
housing, several to a room. Income for the bottom fifth
of households actually fell during the 1990s, due partly
to the use of outsourcing, subcontracting, and temp agencies.
(That gives high-tech companies maximum flexibility. Companies
focus on their core competencies, outsourcing everything else.)
Part-timers, temps, contract workers, and the self-employed
are now 42% of the workforce (vs. 33% for the US). Retail workers
make about $23K/year. Those earning something like $8/hour
often end up in homeless shelters -- if they can get past
the waiting lists. San Jose's soup kitchen servings are up
27% from 1998. Some 20K people had a period of homelessness
last year. Such statistics are hidden by Valley averages,
which show family income up 50% (not adjusted for inflation)
since 1990, to $83K/year (vs. 36% for the whole US, to $47,800).
Santa Clara County has at least 13 billionaires (worth
$45B total), several hundred families with $25M, and 17K
with liquid assets above $1M (not including their houses).
Incomes for the top fifth have risen 29% since 1992,
and software workers now average $96K/year.
[Aaron Bernstein, BW, 27Mar00, p. 76.]
The median house price in California is now $232K,
which only 32% of CA families can afford (down from 43%
a year ago). In the Bay Area, only 21% can afford
a $421K median home (down from 33%) -- and it's still dropping.
(In 1989-90, affordability dropped to 15%.) Average salaries
may be high in Santa Clara County, but only 20% can afford
a $489K median home (also down from 33%). San Francisco's
affordability ratio is only 13%, followed by 15% in San Mateo,
Marin, and Monterey. These figures assume 20% down and a 30-year,
fixed-rate mortgage at 8.06%. To afford that, families
in Santa Barbara or Alameda need to make $92K; Monterey, $112K;
Contra Costa, $113K; Santa Cruz, $117K; San Francisco, $130K;
Santa Clara, $135K; San Mateo, $152K; and Marin, $182K.
For the Bay Area as a whole, it is $115K. However, those
who do own homes are enjoying double-digit appreciation.
[Sue McAllister, SJM, 08Apr00, 1C.]
New figures for Santa Clara county show that only 16%
of households can now afford a median home of $540K.
Only 12% of San Franciscans can afford a home in the city,
vs. 28% for the full Bay Area. [SJM, 05May00.]
National Alliance for Fair Employment is a new advocacy group
for adjunct professors, secretaries, and other contingency
workers. It's a coalition of labor unions, activists,
and advocates for minority rights. The group wants to help
temp workers win health insurance, retirement benefits,
equal rights, and upward mobility. [Kirstin Downey Grimsley,
Washington Post. SJM, 24May00, 14C.]
-----
"If work was a good thing the rich would have it all
and not let you do it." -- Elmore Leonard.
-----