
| Collaboration with Traditional Healers in HIV/AIDS Prevention and Care in Sub-Saharan Africa - A literature review (UNAIDS, 2000, 64 p.) |
| (introduction...) |
| Acknowledgements |
| Introduction |
| AIDS and traditional medicine in Africa |
![]() | Background |
![]() | The role of traditional medicine |
![]() | Health policy and traditional medicine in sub-Saharan Africa |
| Selected examples of collaboration in HIV/AIDS prevention and care |
![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | Botswana |
![]() | Central African Republic |
![]() | Guinea |
![]() | Malawi |
![]() | Mozambique |
![]() | South Africa |
![]() | Uganda |
![]() | United Republic of Tanzania |
![]() | Zambia |
![]() | Conclusions |
| Selected projects reviewed according to UNAIDS Best Practice criteria |
![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | Effectiveness |
![]() | Ethical soundness |
![]() | Efficiency |
![]() | Sustainability |
![]() | Relevance |
| Additional criteria for collaborative projects |
![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | Criteria for selecting 'genuine' or 'authentic' healers |
![]() | Approach used to establish trust with traditional healers |
| Lessons learned |
![]() | Training methods |
![]() | Collaboration |
![]() | Project design and implementation |
| Further research and action |
| Annexes |
![]() | Questionnaire given to project leaders to determine Best Practices |
![]() | Table 1: Summary of documented examples of collaboration in sub-Saharan Africa (1987-1999) |
![]() | Table 2: Review of examples of collaboration according to UNAIDS Best Practice criteria |
![]() | Table 3: Specific criteria/approach for collaboration |
![]() | Table 4: Efficiency calculations for THETA Uganda |
| References and further reading |
| Back Cover |
In addition to the UNAIDS Best Practice criteria, which are general criteria used to assess a wide variety of AIDS-related projects, the following are considerations which apply specifically to collaborative projects between traditional medicine and biomedicine. (For a summary, see Table 3 at the end of the review.)