1. Main outcomes
The workshop ended with considerable enthusiasm among all
participants about the results achieved during the few days of the meeting;
country teams and coordinators felt that the workshop had been a very important
step in the research and was key for its continuation.
|
In summary, the workshop:
· provided one of
the first occasions for countries to compare data collected in a standardized
way. It showed the importance of having good methods and data and justified the
WHO strategy of providing standardized methods for both national assessment and
cross national comparison;
· permitted the review of the
indicators and the political mapping as methods of policy analysis and
assessments of NDP (field testing) and resulted in some improvements which will
be incorporated in the next edition;
· allowed countries to share
experiences in order to develop better approaches for policy formulation and
implementation. Although there is no standard recipe for improving the policy
process in countries, the workshop did come up with some useful conclusions;
· began the process of
identifying specific strengths and weaknesses of existing policy from national
and cross national perspectives; of generating hypotheses to explain how
different pharmaceutical policies can affect the performance of the
pharmaceutical sector; and of identifying specific policy innovations;
· showed the necessity to
develop such research in countries with different socio-economic background; and
to set up sustainable NDP monitoring systems in most
countries;
· finally,
enhanced the research capabilities of all the participants of the 12 countries.
|