| Extending Greenstone for Institutional Repositories : David Bainbridge, Wendy Osborn, Ian H. Witten, David M. Nichols |
|
To help
illustrate the core business of an institutional repository, here is a
minimalist example. Imagine a Faculty of Arts that has moved to a digital
solution—couched as an institutional repository—that replaces the physical
photographic color slide resource that the Faculty previously provided.
Figure 1
shows the submission process, which has in fact been developed using the newly
extended version of Greenstone. A single page is used to gather salient facts
before an item is deposited. Only four items of metadata are requested along
with a picture of the artwork: title, artist, date and notes. A real-world
version would most likely request many more fields than this.
To reach
this page the user has already had to log in. In Figure 1a she is
selecting the destination collection (the Art History repository). In the next
step (Figure 1b) she has used the file browser that is launched by pressing the
“Browse …” button to locate the artwork to submit, and entered metadata
describing the items (Title: The Bower Meadow; Artist: Rossetti; Date:
1871–1872) along with notes about the painting. Along the bottom is a progress
bar with a triangular marker showing the current position (“specify metadata”).
Clicking on
“deposit item” takes her to the next step (Figure 1c) where the new information
is digested into the collection, which occurs in a matter of seconds. The final
step is to view the collection, which is shown in Figure 1d where the user
is browsing the Art History Repository by title. The repository is clearly in
its early stages with only three items added so far, with the newest addition, The Bower Meadow, listed at the top.