![]() | Conducting Environmental Impact Assessment in Developing Countries (United Nations University, 1999, 375 p.) |
![]() | ![]() | 9. Emerging developments in EIA |
![]() | ![]() | 9.5 Environmental health impact assessment |
![]() | ![]() | 9.5.2 Potential methodologies and approaches for addressing health impacts |
![]() |
|
Integrate an existing health impact methodology into the typical activities in an EIA study or use the health impact methodology as the focus of the EIA study. To serve as an example, a generic methodology for EHIA has been suggested by the WHO. It consists of the nine steps listed in Table 9.11. Steps 1 and 2 are related to the normal EIA process in which primary, secondary, and tertiary impacts on environmental parameters are assessed. Step 3 is derived from information given in the EIA and for which environmental health factors can be identified. Methods for identification of environmental health factors could be based on epidemiological and/or toxicological evidences of causal links between environmental parameters and health effects. Step 4 involves the study of exposure pathways. Steps 5 and 6 use epidemiological and toxicological information on dose-incidence and dose-response relationships between environmental parameters and specific health effects. Step 7 can be used to evaluate significance and acceptability of adverse health effects, and step 8 focuses on mitigation measures. Finally, step 9 involves appropriate decision-making. This generic EHIA methodology has been modified to allow its use for chemical manufacturing facilities.
Table 9.11 Steps in EHIA methodology
Item number |
Steps to be taken |
Tools to be used |
Step 1 |
Assessments of primary impacts on environmental
parameters |
Regular impact assessments process |
Step 2 |
Assessments of secondary and tertiary impacts on environmental
parameters |
Regular impact assessments process |
Step 3 |
Screening of impacted environmental parameters of recognized
health significance (EH factors) |
Epidemiological knowledge |
Step 4 |
Assessments of the magnitude of exposed population for each group
of EH factors |
Census, land use planning |
Step 5 |
Assessments of the magnitude of risk groups included in each group
of exposed population |
Census |
Step 6 |
Computation of predicted health impacts in terms of mortality and
morbidity, if possible |
Results from risk assessments studies |
Step 7 |
Definition of acceptable risk (or of significance of adverse
health impacts) |
Assessments of trade off between human and economic
requirements |
Step 8 |
Identification of mitigation measures to prevent or reduce
significant adverse health impacts |
Abatement of EH factors? Magnitude reduction of exposure,
reduction of exposed populations, protection of risk groups |
Step 9 |
Final decision on whether or not the project should
proceed |
|
Source: Giroult, 1988, WHO Interest in EHIA, In: Wathern, P. (Ed.) Theory and Practice, Routledge: London.