![]() | Conducting Environmental Impact Assessment in Developing Countries (United Nations University, 1999, 375 p.) |
![]() | ![]() | 9. Emerging developments in EIA |
![]() | ![]() | 9.2 Cumulative effects assessment |
![]() |
|
Cumulative environmental problems can be desegregated by distinguishing their sources, pathways, and effects. Application of the typology specific to each component provides a basis for identifying and analysing perturbations, mechanisms of accumulation, and temporally and spatially differentiated effects. The framework can provide guidance to conventional CEA practice characterized by multiple projects bound in time and space, as well as to innovative CEAs of temporally repetitive and spatially dispersed human actions of a non-project nature. Such CEAs can generate new information and insights about environmental changes too frequently deemed insignificant.
Table 9.4 Characterizing cumulative effects
Characteristics |
Examples | |
Sources | ||
Action quantity |
Single, multiple, global, cause unknown | |
Action type |
Similar or different, common or uncommon, human or natural,
additions to or removal from environment | |
Temporal characteristics |
Historical, existing, or future; short, medium, or long term; low,
moderate, or high frequency; continuity of actions over time | |
Spatial characteristics |
Local, regional or global; small or large scale; continuity of
actions over space | |
Proponents |
Single or multiple; public or private | |
Source connections |
Connected, unconnected, uncertain connections | |
Pathways to the environment | ||
Environmental media |
Groundwater, surface water, air, energy | |
Degree of concentration |
Concentrated or dispersed over time and space | |
Degree of continuity |
Continuous or discontinuous over time or space (e.g., time or
space lags) | |
Pathway connections |
Connected pathways, unconnected pathways, uncertain connections
across pathways | |
Environment | ||
System type |
Number, type, components, structure, and function of ecological,
social, economic, institutional and political systems | |
Resources |
Number, type and significance | |
Significance |
Number and type of valuable ecosystem and other ecological
components | |
State of environment |
Healthy, impaired, or collapsed; stable or unstable; resilient or
not resilient | |
Environmental connections |
Connected components, unconnected components, uncertain
connections | |
Interactions | ||
Connection to sources |
Connected, not connected, connections uncertain | |
Strength of connections |
Strongly connected, weakly connected | |
Direction of connection |
Direct, indirect, feedback | |
Temporal distribution |
Concentrated or dispersed; continuous or discontinuous
distribution of effects | |
Special distribution |
Concentrated or dispersed; continuous or discontinuous
distribution of effects | |
Nature of connections |
Additive or interactive, reversible or
irreversible | |
Significance of connections |
Significant, insignificant, uncertain
significance |
There remain challenges to conduct a CEA focused on sources, pathways, and effects. Sources of cumulative environmental change that are non-project in nature are likely to involve numerous "proponents'', if they can even be identified.
The least understood of the three components of the framework is pathways of accumulation. The complexity of these pathways is evident in multiple routes, feedback loops, and processes that are interactive, synergistic, or involve compounding. Theoretical understanding and tools to identify, monitor, and analyse these pathways are not readily available.
Finally, while cumulative effects can be analysed using available information sources, empirical evidence is often scanty, and quantitative analyses of effects are hindered by insufficient data. CEA requires a temporal scan of long duration and geographic representation at various scales. The limited time span and local focus of many existing databases impede analyses at broader temporal and spatial scales. Rigorous analysis of cumulative effects requires building up the empirical base.
The field of CEA is still in its infancy, so there are few cases where CEAs for major projects have been completed. In general, thus, there is more agreement on the concept of CEA than there is on practical methodologies and techniques.