Conducting Environmental Impact Assessment in Developing Countries (United Nations University, 1999, 375 p.): 4. EIA methods: 4.3 Matrix: 4.3.6 Limitations of the matrix approach

Conducting Environmental Impact Assessment in Developing Countries (United Nations University, 1999, 375 p.)

(introduction...)

Preface

Abbreviations

1. Introduction

1.1 The environmental movement

1.2 Tracing the history of environmental impact assessment

1.3 Changes in the perception of EIA

(introduction...)

1.3.1 EIA at the project level

1.3.2 From project level to regional EIA

1.3.3 Policy level strategic EIA

FURTHER READING

2. Introduction to EIA

2.1 What is EIA?

2.2 Who is involved in the EIA process?

2.3 When should the EIA be undertaken?

2.4 Effectiveness of EIA

(introduction...)

2.4.1 Legal regulations

2.4.2 Rational and open decision-making

2.4.3 Project EIA sustained by strategic EIA

2.4.4 Room for public participation

2.4.5 Independent review and central information

2.4.6 Scoping in EIA

2.4.7 Quality of the EIA

2.5 EIA and other environmental management tools

3. EIA process

3.1 Introduction

3.2 Principles in managing EIA

(introduction...)

3.2.1 Principle 1: Focus on the main issues

3.2.2 Principle 2: Involve the appropriate persons and groups

3.2.3 Principle 3: Link information to decisions about the project

3.2.4 Principle 4: Present clear options for the mitigation of impacts and for sound environmental management

3.2.5 Principle 5: Provide information in a form useful to the decision makers

3.3 Framework of environmental impacts

3.4 EIA process in tiers

(introduction...)

3.4.1 Screening

(introduction...)

3.4.1.1 Illustrations of screening

3.4.2 Scoping

3.4.3 The initial environmental examination

3.4.4 The detailed EIA study

(introduction...)

3.4.4.1 Prediction

3.4.4.2 Assessment

3.4.4.3 Mitigation

3.4.4.4 Evaluation

3.5 Resources needed for an EIA

3.6 Some illustrations of EIA processes in various countries

(introduction...)

3.6.1 EIA system in Indonesia

(introduction...)

3.6.1.1 Responsibility for AMDAL

3.6.1.2 Screening: determining which projects require AMDAL

3.6.1.3 AMDAL procedures

3.6.1.4 Permits and licenses

3.6.1.5 Public participation in AMDAL

3.6.2 EIA procedure and requirements in Malaysia

(introduction...)

3.6.2.1 Integrated project-planning concept

3.6.2.2 How is EIA processed and approved?

3.6.3 EIA in Canada

(introduction...)

3.6.3.1 The process

FURTHER READING

4. EIA methods

4.1 Introduction

4.2 Checklists

4.2.1 Descriptive checklists

(introduction...)

4.2.2 Weighted-scale checklists

4.2.3 Advantages of the checklist method

4.2.4 Limitations of the checklist method

4.3 Matrix

(introduction...)

4.3.1 Descriptive matrix

4.3.2 Symbolized matrix

4.3.3 Numeric and scaled matrices

4.3.3.1 Simple numeric matrix

4.3.3.2 Scaled matrices

4.3.4 The component interaction matrix

4.3.5 Advantages of the matrix approach

4.3.6 Limitations of the matrix approach

4.4 Networks

(introduction...)

4.4.1 Advantages of the network method

4.4.2 Limitations of the network method

4.5 Overlays

FURTHER READING

5. EIA tools

5.1 Impact prediction

(introduction...)

5.1.1 Application of methods to different levels of prediction

5.1.2 Informal modelling

(introduction...)

5.1.2.1 Approaches to informal modelling

5.1.3 Physical models

5.1.4 Mathematical models

5.1.5 Modelling procedure

5.1.6 Sensitivity analysis

5.1.7 Probabilistic modelling

5.1.8 Points to be considered when selecting a prediction model

5.1.9 Difficulties in prediction

5.1.10 Auditing of EIAs

(introduction...)

5.1.10.1 Auditing prediction in EIAs

5.1.10.2 Problems in conducting predictive techniques audit

5.1.11 Precision in prediction and decision resolution

5.2 Geographical information system

(introduction...)

5.2.1 Data overlay and analysis

5.2.2 Site impact prediction

5.2.3 Wider area impact prediction

5.2.4 Corridor analysis

5.2.5 Cumulative effects assessment and EA audits

5.2.6 Trend analysis

5.2.7 Predicting impacts in a real time environment

5.2.8 Continuous updating

5.2.9 Multi attribute tradeoff system (MATS)

5.2.10 Habitat analysis

5.2.11 Aesthetic analysis

5.2.12 Public consultation

5.2.13 Advantages of the GIS method

5.2.14 Limitations of the GIS method

5.3 Expert systems for EIA

(introduction...)

5.3.1 Artificial intelligence and expert systems

5.3.2 Basic concepts behind expert systems

FURTHER READING

6. Environmental management measures and monitoring

6.1 Introduction

6.2 Environmental management plan (EMP)

(introduction...)

6.2.1 Issues and mitigation measures

(introduction...)

6.2.1.1 Project siting

6.2.1.2 Plant construction and operation

6.2.2 Illustrations of guidelines for mitigation measures for specific projects

(introduction...)

6.2.2.1 Fertilizer industry

6.2.2.2 Oil and gas pipelines

6.2.2.3 Water resource projects

6.2.2.4 Infrastructure projects

6.2.3 Development of a green belt as a mitigation measure

6.3 Post-project monitoring, post-audit, and evaluation

FURTHER READING

7. EIA communication

7.1 Introduction

7.2 What is expected from the user of EIA findings?

7.3 Communication to the public

(introduction...)

7.3.1 Factors that may result in effective public participation

(introduction...)

7.3.1.1 Preplanning

7.3.1.2 Policy of the executing agency

7.3.1.3 Resources

7.3.1.4 Target groups

7.3.1.5 Effective communication

7.3.1.6 Techniques

7.3.1.7 Responsiveness

7.3.2 Overview of the roles of the public

7.3.3 Public participation techniques

(introduction...)

7.3.3.1 Media techniques

7.3.3.2 Research techniques

7.3.3.3 Political techniques

7.3.3.4 Structured group techniques

7.3.3.5 Large group meetings

7.3.3.6 Bureaucratic decentralization

7.3.3.7 Interveners

7.3.4 Implementing public participation

FURTHER READING

8. Writing and reviewing an EIA report

8.1 Writing an EIA report

(introduction...)

8.1.1 Guidelines for preparing EIA reports

8.1.2 Comparison of guidelines of suggested/required components of an EIA report

8.2 Review of an EIA report

(introduction...)

8.2.1 Purpose of the review

8.2.2 Information and expertise needed for review

8.2.3 Strategy of the review

8.2.4 Approach

(introduction...)

8.2.4.1 Independent analysis

8.2.4.2 Predetermined evaluation criteria

8.2.4.3 Ad hoc review

8.2.5 Specific document review criteria

8.3 Preparing terms of reference for consultants or contractors

(introduction...)

8.3.1 Checking out the consulting organization

8.3.2 Strategy for formulating TOR

FURTHER READING

9. Emerging developments in EIA

9.1 Introduction

9.2 Cumulative effects assessment

(introduction...)

9.2.1 Concepts and principles relevant to CEA

(introduction...)

9.2.1.1 Model of causality

9.2.1.2 Input-process-output model

9.2.1.3 Temporal and spatial accumulation

9.2.1.4 Control factors

9.2.2 Conceptual framework

(introduction...)

9.2.2.1 Sources of cumulative environmental change

9.2.2.2 Pathways of cumulative environmental change

9.2.2.3 Cumulative effects

9.2.3 Conclusion

9.3 Sectoral environmental assessment

(introduction...)

9.3.1 Need for SEA

9.3.2 Differences between project level EIA and SEA

9.3.3 Methodologies for SEA

9.3.4 Status of SEA

9.3.5 Effectiveness of SEA

9.4 Environmental risk assessments

9.4.1 What is environmental risk assessment?

9.4.2 Terminology associated with ERA

(introduction...)

9.4.2.1 Hazards and uncertainties

9.4.3 ERA and the project cycle

9.4.4 ERA builds upon EIA

9.4.5 Basic approach to ERA

9.4.6 Characterization of risk

9.4.7 Risk comparison

9.4.8 Quantitative risk assessments

9.4.9 Risk communication

9.4.10 Risk management

9.4.11 Guidelines for disaster management planning

(introduction...)

9.4.11.1 Specification

9.4.11.2 Plot plan

9.4.11.3 Hazardous area classification

9.4.11.4 P & I diagrams

9.4.11.5 Storage of inflammable liquids

9.4.11.6 Risk assessment

9.5 Environmental health impact assessment

(introduction...)

9.5.1 Need for EHIA

9.5.2 Potential methodologies and approaches for addressing health impacts

(introduction...)

9.5.2.1 Adapt EIA study activities

9.5.2.2 Integrate health impacts into EIA

9.5.2.3 Use a targeted approach

9.5.2.4 Probabilistic risk assessment

9.5.3 Proposed methodology

(introduction...)

9.5.3.1 Determining the need for health impact assessment

9.5.3.2 Identify health impacts

9.5.3.3 Prediction of health impacts

9.5.3.4 Interpreting health impacts

9.5.3.5 Mitigation, monitoring, and reporting

9.6 Social impact assessment

9.6.1 What is SIA? Why SIA?

9.6.2 Identifying social impact assessment variables

9.6.3 Combining social impact assessment variables, project/policy stage, and setting

9.6.4 Steps in the social impact assessment process

(introduction...)

9.6.4.1 Public involvement

9.6.4.2 Identification of alternatives

9.6.4.3 Baseline conditions

9.6.4.4 Scoping

9.6.4.5 Projection of estimated effects

9.6.4.6 Predicting response to impacts

9.6.4.7 Indirect and cumulative impacts

9.6.4.8 Change in alternatives

9.6.4.9 Mitigation

9.6.4.10 Monitoring

9.6.5 Principles for SIA

9.6.6 TOR for consultants

FURTHER READING

Annex 9.1: Case study for risk assessments

10. Case studies to illustrate environmental impact assessment studies

Case study 10.1 Tongonan Geothermal Power Plant, Leyte, Philippines

Case study 10.2 Accelerated Mahaweli Development Programme

Case study 10.3 Tin Smelter Project in Thailand

Case study 10.4 Thai National Fertilizer Corporation Project

Case study 10.5 Map Ta Phut Port Project

Case study 10.6 EIA at Work: A Hydroelectric Project in Indonesia

Case study 10.7 The Greater Cairo Wastewater Project

4.3.6 Limitations of the matrix approach

Despite the elegance of matrix presentation, there are certain limitations which need to be addressed.

• Unless weight-scaled impact scores are used, the comparison of many project alternatives is difficult.
• Scaling the multitude of scores contained in a matrix is also not a tractable proposition, as the ability to independently replicate the method is undermined by a dependence on highly subjective judgments.
• The impact characterization step of the matrix involves subjective prediction as well as assessment.
• There is little opportunity for quantification. However, it is possible to accommodate further detailing in the matrix presentation if prediction/evaluation techniques are separately used.
• While developing matrix structure, it becomes apparent that higher order impacts are not accounted for using this approach.

For example, impacts propagate from one component to another and are not necessarily linked directly with the project activities. In the case of a thermal power plant, waste emissions alter the air quality and the altered air quality in turn affects crops, public health, or materials. A water resources project upstream of a river mouth entering the sea, alters the fresh river flow into the sea and this in turn changes the saline zone of the river mouth. This change in the saline zone influences the marine life feeding near the saline wedge, which influences the income of fishermen as well as the marine ecosystem in general. Both these examples question our rudimentary understanding of impacts. This implies that impacts on the nth environmental component can be due to simultaneous and/or successive changes in the other interlinked components.

There is a lot be learned from this improved understanding of impacts.

• In the case of component-component or secondary impacts, the project activity specificity ends. In other words, if a particular project activity alters a particular component, then, regardless of the project activity, this changed component would affect the linked component. For example, if the temperature of the water of the river is raised above a certain threshold (by any activity) then the fish life in the river would be affected.
• Impacts have non-linear relationships and due to the participation of more than one component in some cases, there is the possibility of a delay in their realization, especially in terms of time. Again, delayed impacts do not mean that the "size'' of the impact is attenuated. It is possible that the size can be bigger, especially if there are processes such as "biomagnification'' or if the receiving environment is fragile (e.g., mangrove ecosystems).
• The matrix style needs to be expanded to allow for component-component interactions. This is technically possible by writing a matrix adjacent to another and so on but it can become rather clumsy if there are multi-component (or multi-order) impacts. One may need here a presentation style which allows one to depict the interconnections in a causal style. Network presentation, discussed later, is perhaps a better choice.
• Writing a single matrix for infrastructure or spatial projects becomes rather difficult. For a thermal power plant, for instance, the impact of waste emissions on air quality depends on whether the region under consideration is mostly downwind or not. If a region (or portion of the neighbouring environment) is beyond a hill, then the waste emissions from the power plant almost get screened. Similar arguments would hold for describing the impacts upstream or downstream of a water resources reservoir. In other words, the impact association attempted in the matrix style assumes homogeneity or isotropy in the region, which is not the case in most situations. This may call for writing more than one (maybe five or six) matrix presentations for a project, describing specific situations happening in the spatial elements. This leads once again to technical as well as communication difficulties. Use of geographical information systems (GIS) coupled with impact assessments methodology becomes an attractive alternative.