 | Disaster and Development - Trainer's Guide - 1st edition (Disaster Management Training Programme, 57 p.) |
 |  | TRAINER'S GUIDE |
| | THE BASICS |
| | THE SPECIFICS: Disasters and development |
|  | INTRODUCTION (15 minutes) |
| | (introduction...) |
| | 1. Learning objectives |
| | PART ONE: THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DISASTERS AND DEVELOPMENT (45 minutes) |
| | 2. Part 1 learning objectives |
| | 3. Introduction to disasters & development |
| | 4. The relationship between disasters and development |
| | 5. Definition of terms |
| | 6. Disaster effects can vary by hazard |
| | 7. Question |
| | 8. Vulnerability can vary based on local economic conditions |
| | 9. Question |
| | 10. Summary |
| | PART TWO: UNDERSTANDING AND EXPLOITING DISASTER/DEVELOPMENT LINKAGES (45 minutes) |
| | 11. Part 2 learning objectives |
| | 12. Impact of disasters on development programs |
| | 13. Question |
| | 14. Question |
| | 15. Large scale development projects |
| | 16. Development programs can increase vulnerability |
| | 17. Question |
| | 18. Development programs can decrease vulnerability |
| | 19. Question |
| | 20. Disasters provide opportunities for development initiatives |
| | 21. Question |
| | 22. Recovery programs can reduce vulnerability and promote development |
| | 23. Question |
| | 24. Summary |
| | PARTS THREE AND FOUR: ASSESSING TRADE-OFFS IN INVESTING IN VULNERABILITY REDUCTION AND FORGING THE LINKS BETWEEN DISASTER AND DEVELOPMENT(45 minutes) |
| | 25. Learning objectives |
| | 26. Comparing development investments |
| | 27. Definitions |
| | 28. Estimating losses, costs and benefits |
| | 29. Advantages of formal quantitative methods |
| | 30. Summary |
| | 31. Learning objectives |
| | 32. Role of the UN and NGOs |
| | 33. Collaborating constituencies |
| | 34. Question |
| | 35. Involving the affected community |
| | 36. Question |
| | WRAP-UP (15 minutes) |
| | (introduction...) |
| | 37. Mary Anderson quote |
| | 38. Learning objectives |
3. Introduction to disasters & development
Figure
Discuss the historical tendency to separate disasters and development. Ask the participants to comment why this orientation was prevalent and what, if any, problems have resulted.
· The cause and effect relationship between disasters and development has been ignored
· Disasters were seen in the context of emergency response
· Development programs were not assessed in the context of disasters
· Communities under disaster stress were seen as too turbulent for development initiatives
|
|