Case study 10.2 Accelerated Mahaweli Development Programme
Notes: This case study can be used to make matrices and grade
them.
Name of project: Accelerated Mahaweli Development
Programme.
Type of environmental analysis: Full-scale EIA.
Project
location: Mahaweli basin in Sri Lanka.
Type of project: Rural socio-economic
development.
Table 10.1 Calculation of direct capital and OM&R costs of
alternative wastewater disposal options (in Pesos)
|
Part of project
|
Cost
|
Option 1 -Reinjection
|
1 Construction (2 years)
|
Million Pesos
|
|
(a) reinjection wells
|
70
|
|
(b) pipeline
|
20
|
|
(c) stand-by system
|
17
|
|
|
107
|
|
Construction cost per year
|
53.50
|
|
2 Operation and maintenance per year
|
10.4
|
|
Cash flow:
|
|
|
Year
|
1
|
2
|
3-30
|
|
|
million Pesos
|
53.5
|
53.5
|
10.4
|
|
|
Present value at 15 percent discount rate
|
|
|
Year 1 = 53.5 × 0.8696
|
46.5
|
|
Year 2 = 53.5 × 0.7561
|
40.4
|
|
Years 3-30= 10.4 × 4.9405
|
51.4
|
|
Present value of total direct cost
|
138.30
|
Option 2 -Discharge to Mahiao River without treatment
|
1 Construction
|
|
|
(a) thermal pond (1 year)
|
7
|
|
(b) Water supply system (2 years)
|
50
|
|
2 Operation and maintenance per year
|
|
|
(a) thermal pond
|
0.0433
|
|
(b) water supply system
|
15.0
|
|
Cash Flow:
|
|
|
Year
|
1
|
2
|
3-30
|
|
|
million Pesos
|
25
|
25
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
0.0433
|
|
|
Cost/year
|
25
|
32
|
15.0433
|
|
|
Present value at 15 percent discount rate
|
|
|
Year 1 = 25 × 0.8696
|
21.74
|
|
Year 2 = 32 × 0.7561
|
24.20
|
|
Years 3-30 = 15.0433 × 4.9405
|
74.32
|
|
Present value of total direct cost
|
120.26
|
Option 3 -Discharge to Mahiao River without treatment
|
1 Construction
|
|
|
(a) thermal pond (1 year)
|
7
|
|
(b) Water supply system (2 years)
|
25
|
|
2 Operation and maintenance per year
|
|
|
(a) thermal pond
|
0.0433
|
|
(b) arsenic removal for 15 steam producing wells (at 4 million
Pesos each)
|
60
|
|
(c) water supply system
|
7.5
|
|
Cash flow:
|
|
|
Year
|
1
|
2
|
3-30
|
|
|
million Pesos
|
12.5
|
12.5
|
0.0433
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
Cost/year
|
12.5
|
19.5
|
67.5433
|
|
|
Present value at 15 percent discount rate
|
|
|
Year 1 = 12.5 × 0.8696
|
10.87
|
|
Year 2 = 19.5 × 0.7561
|
14.74
|
|
Years 3-30 = 67.5433 × 4.9405
|
333.7
|
|
Present value of total direct cost
|
359.3
|
Option 6 -Discharge at sea with an outfall at Lao
Point
|
1 Construction
|
|
|
(a) Pipeline (2 years)
|
45
|
|
2 Operation and maintenance per year
|
41.8
|
|
Cash Flow:
|
|
|
Year
|
1
|
2
|
3-30
|
|
|
million Pesos
|
22.5
|
22.5
|
41.8
|
|
|
Present value
|
19.57
|
17.01
|
(206.51)
|
|
|
Present value of total direct cost
|
243.09
|
Brief description
The programme includes the construction of storage and irrigation
facilities sufficient to supply water for the cultivation of 128,000 hectares of
new lands and for the upgrading of 32,000 hectares of existing agricultural
lands in the irrigation systems designated as A, B, C, and D.
Approximately 175,000 families will find permanent employment in
agricultural or agricultural-related activities. New and improved cultivation
will produce more than 600,000 tons of rice and other crops annually and
therefore meet the current import demand for rice as well as satisfy a major
portion of future demands. In addition, the proposed reservoirs will
substantially increase hydroelectric power output for the country.
Table 10.2 Calculation of environmental and resource cost of
alternative waste-water disposal options (in Pesos)
Option 1 - Reinjection
The environmental cost cannot be estimated, although it involves:
(i) possible loss of potential energy; (ii) treatment cost for dissolved solids
in reinjection pipes; and (iii) additional environmental problems from chemicals
used to keep the reinjection pipe from being clogged.
Option 2 - Discharge to Mahiao River without treatment
The environmental effects in this case include both the
quantifiable and the non-quantifiable consequences, namely:
1 rice productivity: 4,000 ha per season serviced by
BRIS;
2 river fishery: no data;
3 stock health;
4 laundry, bathing and
human health; and
5 sea ecosystems.
Quantifiable effects:
Value of rice production loss:
Total rice area = 4,000
ha
Return/ha for irrigated rice
(average 1975-8) = 1,838 - 1,492 = P346
Annual loss if irrigation water cannot be used due to heavy
contamination
= 4,000 × 346 × 2 - (4,000 × 324)
=
2,768,000 - 1,296,000
= P1.47 million
Present value of rice loss at 15 percent discount rate (years
3-30)
1.47 × 4.9405 = P7.26 million
Value of fishery product loss:
assuming total loss of product
currently obtained
From data on average cost and return profile of fishing operation
in Leyte, the nett return
= 6,914 - 4,918
= 1,996
or
= 29 percent of
gross return
Total value of fishery product in the Camotos Sea and Ormoc Bay in
1980
= P39.4 million
Annual loss of fishery product = 39.4 × 0.29 gross return
Present value of fishery loss at 15 percent discount rate (years
3-30)
11.4 × 4.9405 = P56.3 million
Non-quantifiable effects:
River fishery, stock health, human health, loss of water use for
laundry and bathing, effects on the marine ecosystems, plus possible family
dislocation.
Option 3 - Discharge to Mahiao River with treatment
Environmental effects:
1 rice productivity unknown;
2 river fishery; no
data;
3 stock health, laundry, bathing and human health; non-quantifiable but
less than alternative 2; and
4 marine ecosystems; unknown.
Option 6 - Disposal at sea
Environmental effects: unknown effects on marine ecosystems.
Table 10.3 Cost of waste disposal under alternative schemes (in
million Pesos)
Alternative
|
Direct cost
|
Environmental cost
|
Total measured cost
|
Non-quantifiable or non-measured costs
|
Reinjection
|
138.3
|
Unknown
|
138.3
|
Energy loss
|
Untreated Mahiao discharge
|
120.2
|
Rice 7.3 Fishery 56.5
|
184.0
|
Freshwater fishery, stock health, laundry, bathing uses, human
health, sea ecosystems
|
Treated Mahiao discharge
|
359.3
|
|
359.3
|
Rice production and a lower loss on items in alternative 2 with
the exception of sea ecosystems
|
Untreated Bao discharge
|
81.1
|
Fishery 56.5
|
137.6
|
Freshwater fishery, stock health, domestic use, human health, sea
ecosystems
|
Treated Bao discharge
|
359.1
|
-
|
359.1
|
Less than alternative 4
|
Lao Point
|
243.1
|
Unknown
|
243.1
|
Non-quantifiable but high
|
Biasong Pt.
|
353.2
|
Unknown
|
353.2
|
Non-quantifiable but high
|
Under the Accelerated Programme, the total live storage capacity
of the major reservoirs is 2,555 million m3. With full development of
the Rotalawels and Moragahakands reservoirs, a total of more than 4,000 million
m3 of water will be available for irrigation and power generation.
In addition to the proposed dams and reservoirs, the major canal
(Minipe Right Bank Canal) and a tunnel will be constructed to divert water from
the Mahaweli Ganga at Minipe to the Ulhitiya Oya and the Maduru Oya reservoirs
for irrigation of Systems B and C. Also, a barrage (Kandakadu Anicut) may be
built in the Mahaweli Ganga near Manampitiya to divert Mahaweli water to System
A.
The areas which will be irrigated under the Accelerated Programme
could be tabulated. These data could be compiled from the most recent estimates
from ongoing feasibility studies for System A, B, C, and D. When fully
developed, the Accelerated Programme will provide irrigation supplies for the
cultivation of 80,800 hectares of new lands (mostly for paddy) and for the
improvement of 14,350 hectares which are in existing irrigation schemes.
The proposed settlement plan for the Accelerated Programme
includes the clustering of house lots into a hamlet which will be located not
more than 1-2 km from irrigated allotments. Each hamlet will be comprised of
about 100 settler family units, each allotted 0.4 hectares (one acre) of upland
as a house lot and vegetable garden and 1 hectare for paddy cultivation. About
four or five hamlets will be consolidated into a village, and four village
centres will form a township. All the necessary infrastructure such as roads,
schools, hospitals, etc. will be provided by the government, and it is expected
that the settlers will establish other facilities such as a shopping centre,
community centres, etc. through their own efforts. In addition to the present
inhabitants, the Accelerated Programme area will accommodate a population of
about one million people.
Pertinent reports
Two EIA reports were prepared relating to the Mahaweli project:
(a) "Environmental Assessment, Accelerated Mahaweli Development Programme'', by
TAMS for Ministry of Mahaweli Development of Sri Lanka/USAID, Oct. 1980; and (b)
"Environmental Assessment of Stage 11 of the Mahaweli Ganga Development
Project'', USAID, Sept. 1977.
The present study is based essentially on the former reference.
Environmental study area
The portion of the Mahaweli Ganga river basin which includes
Kotmale, Victoria, Randenigala, Ulhitiya Oya, and Madura Oya reservoirs and
their catchments and downstream irrigation areas, plus the Rotalavela and
Moragahakanda reservoir systems as applicable.
Environmental study team
Data not included in EIA report.
EIA budget adequacy
Data not included in EIA report.
Methodology
The EIA classifies the environmental resources of the study area
into three categories: (i) terrestrial environment, (ii) aquatic environment,
and (iii) human environment. The human environment category includes three
subcategories, "social profile'', "cultivation practices'' (including pest
control), and "public health''.
Existing environmental conditions
The EIA presents detailed information on the existing
environmental conditions. Some pertinent information, according to
classifications used, is as follows.
Terrestrial environment
The climate is hot and humid, with two annual monsoons of 1,650 mm
rain. In the dry zones (to be serviced by the proposed irrigation system)
evapotranspiration usually exceeds rain.
Over the past 25 years, community (town) areas increased from
1,000 to 4,000 ha, intensive agriculture decreased from 87,000 to 63,000 ha, and
forest areas have reduced by half. Present land uses indicate chena cropping
occupying 23 per cent of the land within the project irrigation service area
(ISA).
About 28 per cent of the proposed ISA is forested (tropical dry
mixed evergreen forest). All former forest reserves were released for
development and have been largely cleared, and rapid encroachment on the
remaining forest is continuing (and will be accelerated by the proposed
irrigation).
The region's wildlife has been exceptionally diverse with a
variety of habitat including marshes (villus) and grasslands as well as forests.
Several wildlife reserves are within the project area (wholly or partly) and
others are nearby. A number of the species are endemic and are threatened.
Aquatic environment
The Mahaweli Ganga is the largest river in Sri Lanka, and the
project is based on utilization of this resource. Groundwater is very limited in
the project area.
The water quality of project area rivers is well suited for
irrigation and other human use purposes (low salinity, low sodium absorption
ratios).
Most of the fish catch is from irrigation tanks (about 180
kg/ha/year). Inundation (floodplains) fisheries amount to about 50 kg/ha/year.
Riverine fishing is of the subsistence type. Total annual project area catch is
about 1,850 tons. In addition there are substantial fisheries on both the Maduru
Oya and Mahaweli Ganga rivers. Fish farming is very limited.
Per capita fish consumption has declined from 11.4 kg in 1972 to
10.4 kg in 1978. Because this is important to rural nutrition, one project goal
is to increase this to 20 kg/year. Another goal is to improve the income of
fishermen families, many of whom are landless.
The wetland in the project area includes some 60 villus (marshes)
ranging from 10 to 900 ha in size, distributed throughout the total Mahaweli
Ganga floodplains area of about 12,800 ha. The villus are highly productive
biologic communities and a high-quality wildlife habitat. They are commercially
important for the grasses produced, which are enough to support 1 head of
livestock per ha of villa.
Human environment
The project area is sparsely populated, and farmers are engaged
mostly in rice cropping below village tanks or upland crops grown in chena
cultivation. The population is predominantly Sinhalese, average family size is
about 5, and "encroachers'' are plentiful. More than half the families earn less
than Rs 3,000/year.
In traditional villages in the project area, farmers operate
usually a 0.2 to 0.6 hectare plot of lowland below the village tank, a small
rainfed homestead plot, and an area of rainfed upland shifting chena
cultivation. On the irrigated lowlands, rice farming is developed as a
predominant monoculture, especially within the large tank systems. On some
well-drained parts of the lowlands, chillies, onions, and vegetables are also
grown. Paddy yields from rainfed and irrigated sources average about 2.5
tons/hectare/year. The availability of water is a major factor affecting yield
levels as well as cropping intensity. Where a reliable water supply is
available, paddy yields are well above 3.0 tons/hectare, occasionally reaching
4.5 tons/hectare.
On the rainfed homestead plots, various perennials and vegetables
are grown along with bananas, pineapples, mangoes, papaya, and other tropical
fruits. The chena cultivation focuses on annuals, mainly cereal and root crops,
including pulses, millets, vegetables, tobacco, and often rainfed paddy. Most of
the encroachers who have entered the project area in the past few years are
subsisting on chena cultivation.
The most serious insect pest for rice in the project area is the
brown planthopper. Other major insect pests include rice thrips and paddy bug.
Sugarcane suffers considerable damage from shoot borers and smut. In addition,
the mania and rose ringed parakeets cause an estimated 5 per cent loss to rice
crops in the project area. Wild boar and elephants are also responsible for
substantial crop losses.
Diarrhoeal diseases are common, due to inadequate sanitation. Of
the vector-borne diseases, malaria is considered of primary project concern.
However, malaria incidence has been decreasing due to anti-malaria programmes
implemented over the past decade.
Significant environmental effects from project
Terrestrial environment
Watershed erosion is severe, but nevertheless reservoir siltation
will not be enough to impair reservoir operations over the project design period
(50 years).
Conversion of downstream forest/scrub land/chena areas to paddy
will of course eliminate considerable wildlife habitat. Also, decreased river
flood flows will convert much of the villus area into comparatively poor grazing
area.
Increased encroachment seems inevitable both for "squatter land''
and for fuel. Project implementation will also make use of new lands for
irrigation some of which has been valuable wildlife habitat. However, these same
encroachments seem likely to occur eventually in any case. The present project
will accelerate the process.
Aquatic environment
Under the Accelerated Programme, a large amount of the water
diverted from the Mahaweli Ganga will be delivered to irrigation systems outside
of the Mahaweli Basin. Of the remainder, only about 20 per cent is likely to
re-enter the Mahaweli as irrigation return flow. Overall, the volume of flow in
the river will be reduced by about 50 per cent. Wet as well as dry season flows
are expected to decrease in the Mahaweli; however, future flows during the dry
months should increase slightly in the Maduru Oya due to the planned transbasin
diversion into System B. Flood peaks in the Mahaweli Ganga will be considerably
reduced by the surcharge storage in the new reservoirs.
With the conversion of forests to agricultural land, the future
surface run-off is expected to increase. However, the effect on stream flows
should not be significant, because the forested area to be cleared is relatively
small in comparison with the total drainage area of the Mahaweli Basin. In
addition, the increased run-off will be retained by rice paddies and eventually
lost to evapotranspiration.
In a few localized areas water quality in return flows may
deteriorate significantly, preventing their immediate reuse for irrigation. This
may occur where salt accumulates due to improper drainage or where sonic
sub-soils exist which, when irrigated, release sodium into drainage waters.
However, in most of the project area, adequate drainage and the flushing action
of heavy monsoon rains should limit salt build-up in soils or high sodium
concentration problems.
Generally, surface water and groundwater in the project area
should be suitable for livestock drinking as well as for swimming, bathing,
clothes washing, and related domestic uses. However, the use of these waters for
bathing or swimming and for human consumption will depend upon the provision of
protected water supplies and adequate sanitation facilities.
Potential fish yields calculated for the proposed reservoirs
clearly indicate that the deep up-country reservoirs are likely to be much less
productive (20 to 30 kilograms/hectare/year) in terms of fish output than the
shallower low-country ones (100 to 300 kilograms/hectare). Yields from the
reservoirs will greatly exceed existing river yields both on a unit and total
area basis. The total nett yield for the major proposed reservoirs is estimated
at about 2,550 tons/year.
The presence of a series of dams on the main river will also block
upstream spawning migrations of the massier. This, combined with the inability
of the massier to adapt to reservoir habitats, will probably result in a
significant reduction in the population of this species within the Mahaweli
Ganga. Other species which may be adversely affected by interference with
migratory movements include eels, two species of barbs, the endemic mountain
labeo and the freshwater shrimp Macrobrachium.
The reduction of floodplain and associated villa areas will result
in a corresponding loss to fisheries resources. The total loss in terms of fish
yield is estimated at 320 tons/year. A further non-quantifiable adverse impact
would be the reduction of floodplain spawning and nursery grounds for a number
of fish species which inhabit rivers, streams backwaters, ponds, and tanks of
the entire Mahaweli Ganga system. Overall, there will be a nett increase in
potential fish yields from project area waters of about 2,140 tons, or a gross
economic benefit of about Rs 8.6 million annually.
There will be a reduction in area for livestock grazing in the
villus and a decrease in the villa carrying capacity from 1.0 to 0.75 animal
units per hectare. The total carrying capacity for the project area villus will
be decreased by more than 60 per cent, to a level of 2,880 animal units per
grazing period. The decrease in floodplain villa area will result in a total
loss in quantifiable economic benefits of about Rs 5.7 million annually. This
includes losses to fisheries, grazing, and associated dairy production.
Any of the new reservoirs, irrigation canals, drainage systems, or
paddy areas may be susceptible to aquatic weed infestation, chiefly from water
hyacinth, floating ferns, or cattails. Particular areas of concern would be
where eutrophication may be increased due to the accumulation of nutrients from
run-off or return flows. Consequently, small downstream tanks and villus, the
lower part of the Mahaweli Ganga with its reduced flow, and the shallow
Kandakadu Barrage are likely to experience a continued infestation of water
weeds.
Human environment
A major social impact of the Accelerated Programme will involve
the transition from small isolated village societies to production-oriented
large-scale colonization schemes. Implicit in the model of transition is the
modernization of rural society with the attendant loss of traditional values and
social cohesion within small kinship-based villages.
The population in the project area will be increased by about 1
million people. Current project area residents who are over eighteen years of
age and have an agricultural background will have priority in the resettlement
planning. The principal social benefits will accrue to settler families who
stand to gain land and irrigation waters; this is also the major benefit
perceived by project area residents as well as potential settlers from other
regions who are applying for allotments.
An important attitude prevailing among future settlers is that the
1 hectare paddy land allotment, irrigated for two full seasons, will represent
an improvement from present landholding. However, planning calls for traditional
inheritance and kinship roles to be abandoned with respect to the mechanisms for
landholding and its acquisition. This may prove difficult to enforce; studies
elsewhere indicated that allotted land was leased, mortgaged, and given in
tenancy to relatives within the first year of cultivation.
As in previous colonization schemes, the Accelerated Programme
will also face the problem of employment for the second generation of the farmer
settler families. Some of the second generation offspring can provide employment
in non-farm sectors; however, not all of them can be accommodated in this
manner. This may lead to fragmentation of paddy land and home plots or the
further encroachment on undeveloped lands within or adjacent to irrigation
blocks. Many of the present chena farmers in the area are second generation
settlers from other schemes who have encroached land in order to be in a
position of acceptance in the new programme.
At the proposed reservoir sites, especially Victoria and Kotmale,
a total of 25,000 to 30,000 residents will have to be relocated. The affected
people have accepted the inevitability of relocation, but there is a general
resentment and a sense of loss of ancestral homes for those who have experienced
little geographic mobility moving to nearby estates or into the Mahaweli area,
which would benefit smaller landholders. However, most are concerned about how
they can support themselves in the period it will take to replace their lost
tree crops and paddy.
A major benefit of the Accelerated Programme will be to increase
agricultural output. The main focus will be on rice production. The single rice
crop intensity presently achieved per year under rainfed conditions or small
tank irrigation will be increased to obtain double cropping. Approximately 8
tons per hectare of paddy will be produced from the two crops grown per year on
the newly cultivated lands. Moreover, much of the existing irrigated paddy land
will receive supplemental water to permit additional cropping intensity.
One constraint to the high intensity rice monoculture envisioned
will be the farm labour supply. Another problem will be pest control. Since
there are no geographical barriers to prevent the movement of any known insect
pest or plant disease, it is anticipated that the crops proposed for the project
area will be susceptible to damage from the same pests found in other parts of
the island. Intensity of pest activity for the new rice growing areas is
expected to be manifested by an increase of brown planthopper and sheath blight.
Extensive sections of wildlife habitat will be removed and thus
eliminate a substantial amount of natural predator control. This, coupled with
the increase in cultivated areas and the intensification through double
cropping, will necessitate a significant increase in the use of insecticides,
fungicides, and herbicides.
With the substantial increase in population which is anticipated
in the project area, there will be an inevitable spread of a number of viral and
parasitic water-borne communicable diseases. This will be exacerbated by the
lack of basic health education combined with the cultural practices of the
people. They would be expected to continue their present utilization of the same
water supply for drinking, bathing, and waste disposal which would be very
conducive to the spread of gastroenteritis, hepatitis, dysentery, and other
water-borne diseases. This condition will be worsened if suitable water supply
and sanitation facilities are not provided, or, perhaps more importantly, not
maintained.
Reduced river flows and seepage from irrigation channels in the
project area will enhance the formation of small pools which will increase the
breeding potential of the principal malaria vector, Anopheles
culicifacies. Malaria incidence will undoubtedly increase in the region. The
present intensive control programme involves the risk of producing
malathion-resistant A. culicifacies which could trigger an epidemic until
new controls are decided. This vector has already developed resistance to
malathion in India.
Among the other diseases, dengue fever, chikungunya virus, scrub
typhus and bed bugs are all likely to spread in the project area. For the
present, neither filariasis nor schistosomiasis would be expected to spread as a
result of project implementation.
Rabies, tetanus, accidents and snake bites are also likely to
increase, particularly in the early years of construction and clearing. Tetanus
may be a serious problem for construction workers due to its prevalence in the
project area soils. Existing health facilities in the Mahewali region will, of
course, be too limited to accommodate the health needs of the additional
population.
Overall, dietary patterns and nutritional quality should improve
for the incoming settlers due principally to increased food availability and an
increased standard of living. However, one potentially serious problem may be an
insufficient supply of animal protein to meet nutritional requirements for the
general maintenance of good health. The supply of dairy products to the project
area may be limited since the grazing area may be reduced. On the other hand,
increased freshwater fish production could contribute significantly to meet this
need for animal protein.
Measures for offsetting adverse effects
Coordinating agency
Establishment of a National Coordinating Agency for Natural
Resources, along with an Environmental Protection Agency, is recommended for
furnishing institutions capable for follow-up implementation of needed
environmental protection measures.
Watershed management/forests
A package of watershed soil conservation measures is recommended,
including reforestation, establishing timber and fuel wood plantations,
rehabilitating abandoned plantations by conversion to upland cropping, plus
engineering measures for erosion control. The fuelwood plantations would utilize
local village participation. A "Mahaweli Catchment Redevelopment Law'' would be
enacted for establishing a new National Forest Authority. Included in the
package would be the preparation of a systematic plan for continuing logging and
clearing operations.
Wildlife
New wildlife reserves are to be established in those "high quality
wildlife habitat'' areas not needed for agricultural purposes. In addition, to
compensate for loss of habitat in the Mahaweli region, a series of six large
continuous reserves/parks are recommended in and around the project area. These
include the Somawathie National Park (especially important for elephants),
Mahaweli Conservation Park (bird sanctuary), and Wasgomuwa National Park
(endangered vertebrate species). A package of institutional improvements is
recommended, including establishing a National Department of Wildlife
Conservation, and authorizing a detailed study for planning the proposed new
park and other reserve systems.
Wetlands and weed control
Within the context of the measures described above, the remaining
villus and mangrove swamps will be preserved to the extent possible. A programme
will also be developed for use of practicable methods for controlling aquatic
weeds.
Fisheries development
The recommended action programmes include: (i) establishing
fisheries management systems for the new reservoirs, (ii) a series of pilot
project fish farms to determine the best approach for achieving markedly
expanded aquaculture, and (iii) strengthening of the ongoing "tank'' type of
aquaculture using relatively low level technology including construction of a
centralized hatchery.
Downstream water and soil management
These recommendations include: (i) establishment of a water
management system in the ISA, (ii) control of land clearing operations to
minimize loss of topsoil and subsequent erosion, (iii) use of contour techniques
in upland areas including plantings and terracing, (iv) establishment of
riverbank forest reserves, (v) use of an integrated pest management approach,
and (vi) establishing a multipurpose water and soils monitoring programme
including a salinity intrusion survey and periodic water quality monitoring.
Health and sanitation
The recommendations include: (i) provision of an adequate rural
water supply system, (ii) control of malaria and other vector mosquitoes through
strengthening of the existing programmes, (iii) immunization procedures to be
used during the construction, and (iv) strengthening of primary health care
resources.
Social considerations
The recommendations include: (i) establishment of a regional
planning and socio-economic studies unit, (ii) establishment of a settler
orientation programme, (iii) studies for developing guidelines for managing a
variety of social problems, including special attention to the poorer population
sectors such as fishermen's families and agricultural labourers, and evaluation
of tourist potentials, and (iv) strengthening of agricultural extension
services.
Land use planning
This recommendation is for preparation of an optimal land use
scheme which allows maximum agricultural development commensurate with
preservation of forests/wildlife, including detailed mapping of non-arable lands
and associated studies including evaluation of grazing potentials.
Priorities and scheduling
A tentative scheduling is outlined, showing when the various
recommendations are to be undertaken as related to the various stages of project
implementation.
Environmental monitoring
While the study does not deal with the need for comprehensive
environmental monitoring, it does recommend a comprehensive "multipurpose soils
and water monitoring programme'' in the project irrigation service area. Other
monitoring is to be included under the various recommended sector programmes.
Concluding remarks
The recommendations of the EIA for achieving desired environmental
protection measures as part of the overall plan are very comprehensive, so much
so that implementing them will require major alterations in the existing
national government structure and
policies.