![]() | Law in Humanitarian Crises Volume I : How Can International Humanitarian Law Be Made Effective in Armed Conflicts? (European Commission Humanitarian Office) |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | The Laws of War: Problems of Implementation in Contemporary Conflicts |
![]() | ![]() | I. Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | II. Implementation Provisions and Mechanisms |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | 1. From 1899 to the Second World War |
![]() | ![]() | 2. The Post-Second World War Trials |
![]() | ![]() | 3. The Post-1945 Conventions: General |
![]() | ![]() | 4. The Post-1945 Conventions: Humanitarian, Monitoring and Fact-Pinding Tasks |
![]() | ![]() | 5. The Post-1945 Conventions: Punishment and Compensation |
![]() | ![]() | 6. Other Mechanisms of Implementation |
![]() | ![]() | 7. The Involvement of the United Nations |
![]() | ![]() | 8. The International Court of Justice |
![]() | ![]() | III. Problems of Implementation in Wars since 1980 |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | 1. Iran-Iraq War 1980-88 |
![]() | ![]() | 2. The 1990-91 Gulf Conflict |
![]() | ![]() | 3. The Wars in the Former Yugoslavia since 1991 |
![]() | ![]() | 4. Civil War and Humanitarian Intervention in Somalia 1992-95 |
![]() | ![]() | 5. International Conference, Geneva, August-September 1993 |
![]() | ![]() | 6. Rwanda 1994 |
![]() | ![]() | IV. General Issues |
![]() | ![]() | 1. Woodrow Wilson's Dilemma in 1914 |
![]() | ![]() | 2. Successors' Responses to illegal Acts of Previous Regimes |
![]() | ![]() | 3. One Alternative Vision |
![]() | ![]() | V. Summary and Conclusions |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | 1. Realist and Idealist Images of the Laws of War |
![]() | ![]() | 2. Still a World of States |
![]() | ![]() | 3. Humanitarianism as a Substitute for Policy |
![]() | ![]() | 4. Application to Non-International Conflicts |
![]() | ![]() | 5. Mines |
![]() | ![]() | 6. Limits of Compliance Provisions |
![]() | ![]() | 7. Trials |
![]() | ![]() | 8. International Criminal Court |
![]() | ![]() | 9. Reparations |
![]() | ![]() | 10. The United Nations |
![]() | ![]() | 11. Barbarians? |
![]() | ![]() | 12. A Set of Professional Military Standards? |
![]() | ![]() | 13. Need to Keep Our Own Houses in Order |
![]() | ![]() | 14. The Relation between Ius in Bello and Ius ad Bellum |
![]() | ![]() | 15. Taking Implementation Seriously |
![]() | ![]() | The Implementation of International Humanitarian Law in the Framework of United Nations Peace-keeping Operations |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | I. The United Nations and Humanitarian Law |
![]() | ![]() | II. The failure of the UN in Constituting Enforcement Instruments and the Practice of the Security Council of Authorizing Enforcement Action by States |
![]() | ![]() | III. The Law of International Armed Conflicts and UN Enforcement Operations Under Chapter VII |
![]() | ![]() | IV. The Alternative Experience of Peace-keeping Operations |
![]() | ![]() | VI. The Applicability of International Humanitarian Law to Peace-keeping Operations in the Light of General Instruments of International Law |
![]() | ![]() | VII. The Practice of Specific Instruments Concerning the Applicability of International Humanitarian Law in Peace-keeping Operations |
![]() | ![]() | VIII. A Conclusion in the Light of the 1994 Convention on the Safety of United Nations Personnel |
![]() | ![]() | International Humanitarian Law and the Law of Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | I. Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | II. The Inadequacy of International Refugee Law in Situations of Armed Conflict |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | 1. The Need for Reconsidering the Refugee Definitions in International Law |
![]() | ![]() | 2. The Need for Improving the Substantive Rights of Refugees in Situations of Armed Conflict |
![]() | ![]() | 3. The Need for Improving International Co-operation with Regard to Refugees from Situations of Armed Conflict |
![]() | ![]() | 4. The Need for Further Consideration of International Action in Favour of Refugees from Situations of Armed Conflict |
![]() | ![]() | III. The Inadequacy of International Law in Respect of Internally Displaced Persons |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | 1. Existing Norms of International Law Applying to Internally Displaced Persons |
![]() | ![]() | 2. The Lacunae of International Law in Respect of Internally Displaced Persons |
![]() | ![]() | 3. Possible Ways of Improving the Legal Situation of Internally Displaced Persons |
![]() | ![]() | 4. The Need for Further Consideration of International Action in Favour of Internally Displaced Persons |
![]() | ![]() | IV. The Need for Comprehensive Approaches |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | 1. Overcoming the Differentiation Between Externally Displaced Persons (Refugees) and Internally Displaced Persons |
![]() | ![]() | 2. Overcoming the Still Existing Differentiation in International Law as Regards Norms Applicable Before, During and After Situations of Armed Conflicts Resulting in Forced Movements of Persons |
![]() | ![]() | V. Conclusions and Recommendations |
![]() | ![]() | Notes on the Contributors |
![]() | ![]() | Abbreviations |