Selection of examples
The meaning of low cost varies according to the
circumstances of the country and of the enterprise concerned. What may seem a
very minor expenditure in one case may represent a difficult financial decision
in another situation. Moreover, the actual cost depends on local wage and
materials costs, whether or not an outside supplier must be used and other
factors. It was therefore necessary to adopt a pragmatic definition of low cost
rather than a specific amount of money. The following cost criteria were used to
select examples:
- the actual financial outlay should be within the
day-to-day possibilities of most enterprises, including smaller enterprises;
- the materials and labour required should be easily available,
wherever possible within the enterprise itself;
- examples which increased productivity or work quality at the
same time they improved working conditions are emphasised, especially if the
gains are clearly identifiable.
A straightforward procedure was followed Fifteen institutions
from ten countries participated: Bangladesh, Burma, India, Indonesia, Malaysia,
Pakistan, the Philippines, Singapore, Sri Lanka and Thailand. Of these
institutions, five were university departments, two were independent research
institutes, five were labour inspectorates and three were governmental research
and training institutes. They are listed at the end of this Introduction. The
collaborating institutions were asked to report examples of low-cost
improvements for each of several aspects of conditions of work and occupational
safety and health. Case reports were made using a standardised form which
emphasised cost measurement. Photographs or drawings of the improvements were
also provided wherever possible. In all, 236 cases were reported. One hundred
selected cases are compiled in this book. In addition, brief information is
provided on additional similar cases at the end of some of the case
descriptions.