![]() | The Improvement of Tropical and Subtropical Rangelands (BOSTID) |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Acknowledgements |
![]() | ![]() | Panel on the improvement of tropical and subtropical rangelands |
![]() | ![]() | Contributors |
![]() | ![]() | National research council staff |
![]() | ![]() | Preface |
![]() | ![]() | Overview: Dimensions of a worldwide environmental crisis |
![]() | ![]() | The geographical scope |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | Part I |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | The nature of tropical and subtropical rangelands |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Range classification |
![]() | ![]() | Social system-ecosystem interactions |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | The social context for rangeland improvement |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Production systems in tropical and subtropical regions |
![]() | ![]() | Context of environmental degradation |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | The economic context |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Range systems |
![]() | ![]() | The basis of range economics |
![]() | ![]() | Project analysis |
![]() | ![]() | Determining costs and benefits |
![]() | ![]() | Resource evaluation |
![]() | ![]() | Market price determination |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | Regional resource assessment |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Information needs |
![]() | ![]() | Information acquisition |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | Site evaluation |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | An ecosystem perspective |
![]() | ![]() | A systems approach to site evaluation |
![]() | ![]() | Evaluation of abiotic and biotic components |
![]() | ![]() | Integrated evaluations |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | Grazing management |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Grazing management concepts |
![]() | ![]() | Time of grazing |
![]() | ![]() | Distribution of grazing |
![]() | ![]() | Type of animal grazing |
![]() | ![]() | Number of animals grazing |
![]() | ![]() | Grazing management planning |
![]() | ![]() | Grazing management systems |
![]() | ![]() | Livestock management |
![]() | ![]() | The herima system in Mali |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | Rehabilitation techniques |
![]() | ![]() | Establishing plants on the range |
![]() | ![]() | Natural revegetation |
![]() | ![]() | Direct seeding |
![]() | ![]() | Improvement of tropical and subtropical rangelands |
![]() | ![]() | Selected practices |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | Criteria for plant selection |
![]() | ![]() | Project planning |
![]() | ![]() | Socioeconomic and management considerations in feasibility studies |
![]() | ![]() | Adaptation to ecoclimatic conditions |
![]() | ![]() | Adaptation to soils |
![]() | ![]() | Adaptation to physiography, geomorphology, topography, slope, and aspect |
![]() | ![]() | Ability of introduced species to compete with native vegetation |
![]() | ![]() | Use regimes |
![]() | ![]() | Availability of seeds and plant materials |
![]() | ![]() | Maintenance of biological diversity |
![]() | ![]() | Plant improvement |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | Part II |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction to the case studies |
![]() | ![]() | Pastoral regimes of Mauritania |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Physical geography |
![]() | ![]() | Migration cycle |
![]() | ![]() | The Beni Mguild of Morocco |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Physical geography |
![]() | ![]() | Migratory cycle |
![]() | ![]() | The Kel Tamasheq |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | Camp organization |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | Dromedary pastoralism in Africa and Arabia |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | Reproduction and risk |
![]() | ![]() | Management and labor |
![]() | ![]() | Subsistence production |
![]() | ![]() | Marketing |
![]() | ![]() | Predatory pastoralism |
![]() | ![]() | The future of camel pastoralism |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | The mountain nomads of Iran: Basseri and Bakhtiari |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | The physical environment |
![]() | ![]() | The basseri |
![]() | ![]() | The bakhtiari |
![]() | ![]() | The Marri Baluch of Pakistan |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Physical environment |
![]() | ![]() | Seasons and migrations |
![]() | ![]() | A mixed economic system |
![]() | ![]() | Conclusiones |
![]() | ![]() | Changing patterns of resource use in the Bedthi-Aghanashini valleys of Karnataka state, India |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | The setting |
![]() | ![]() | Human communities |
![]() | ![]() | Traditional patterns of resource management |
![]() | ![]() | Colonial period |
![]() | ![]() | After independence |
![]() | ![]() | Recent trends |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | Kenya: Seeking remedies for desert encroachment |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | Background |
![]() | ![]() | Traditional pastoralism |
![]() | ![]() | Baseline studies |
![]() | ![]() | Vegetation and livestock |
![]() | ![]() | Directions for the future |
![]() | ![]() | The hema system in the Arabian peninsula |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Rights of ownership or use |
![]() | ![]() | The hema system in Saudi Arabia |
![]() | ![]() | The mahmia or marah, and the koze system in Syria |
![]() | ![]() | Neglect of the hema and its consequences |
![]() | ![]() | Hema in the range improvement and conservation programs in the near east |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | Wildlife land use at the Athi River, Kenya |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Background |
![]() | ![]() | Some early findings |
![]() | ![]() | Conclusion |
![]() | ![]() | Camel husbandry in Kenya: Increasing the productivity of ranchland |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | Location |
![]() | ![]() | Vegetation |
![]() | ![]() | Livestock |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction of camels |
![]() | ![]() | Management and adaptability |
![]() | ![]() | Reproduction and lactation |
![]() | ![]() | Veterinary notes |
![]() | ![]() | Economics |
![]() | ![]() | Reference |
![]() | ![]() | The potential of faidherbia albida for desertification control and increased productivity in Chad |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Background |
![]() | ![]() | Characteristics of faidherbia albida |
![]() | ![]() | Project description |
![]() | ![]() | Project analysis and evaluation |
![]() | ![]() | Conclusions |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | Improving Nigeria's animal feed resources: Pastoralists and scientists cooperate in fodder bank research |
![]() | ![]() | Board on science technology for international development |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Members |
A number of problems confound the establishment of prices for use in project planning. Obtaining satisfactory price information is usually not a difficult problem in the United States. Merchants, dealers, and farm operators can usually provide satisfactory information on current levels of prices paid and received and wage rates. In developing countries, however, specific price information may be more difficult to obtain, and short-term price fluctuations are likely.
To the extent that markets exist and market price information is available, market prices should be used, but a few caveats must be considered. First, if market prices are generated from a location remote from the project area, then it would be necessary to make adjustments to account for differences from the project area because of transportation costs, any losses due to waste, spoilage, shrinkage, or death loss, and for transaction costs at the marketplace.
If prices tend to fluctuate in a completely irregular or random fashion or in a cyclical fashion, an average price or expected value may have to be used through a series of years.
Prices are one of the crucial assumptions in planning, and the importance of good price forecasting cannot be overemphasized. However, it is possible to become too fearful and exaggerate the consequences of errors. The effects of different prices can be ascertained quite easily by "sensitivity analysis" after the major budgets have been prepared. This may be desirable, both to test the stability of a particular budgeted solution against variations in prices, and also to ascertain the amount of possible loss if the price assumptions are in error. The probability of different occurrences may also be assessed.
In project planning, the determination of prices is a problem if satisfactory market or price reporting systems do not exist. Often the only valid way to place a value on forage is indirectly, by determining its value through the livestock production process. In that case, the costs of producing the forage as an intermediate product could be used. Placing a price on the forage directly is unnecessary.
As mentioned earlier in the chapter, valuation problems are very difficult for the so-called non market or social considerations involved in improvement and rehabilitation practices. For instance, it is very difficult to place values on such things as enhanced erosion or flood control, dune stabilization, or enhanced wildlife production. However, damage mitigation analysis (as used in water resource projects) can be applied. In such a situation, the before analysis would overstate the without analysis and the before-after comparisons would understate the benefits of the proposed project compared with the without-with comparison.
The analyses based on the without-with approach to projections is generally more complicated because it does require projections of two situations. The current before situation can only be taken as a data base or benchmark and guideline information. A before-after type comparison is based on the current situation as one projection and only one projection is required for the relatively unknown after situation.