5. Making It Happen: Energy for Sustainable Development
a fundamental change in energy systems is
required: they must be oriented towards sustainable development
A fundamental change in energy systems is required to make them
compatible with sustainable development. This change is required due to the
social, economic, environmental and security issues discussed in Chapter 2
above.
The transition to sustainable energy systems will be shaped by
current trends sweeping the world and operating through, or in conjunction with,
strong constraints on traditional actors, and new opportunities. The major
trends include globalisation, marketisation, popular participation in
decision-making, the changing roles of government, restructuring (and
corporatisation) of energy utilities, and the changing magnitude and mix of
sources of external funding.
Most governments today work under increasingly austere fiscal
conditions. This seriously affects their role as investors in energy and in
R&D and as donors of Official Development Assistance (ODA).
In the mid-1990s, annual investments in the energy supply
sector world-wide are of the order of US$450 billion per year. With total annual
energy investment requirements projected to increase to around US$ 1,000 billion
dollars per year by 2020 (with two-thirds for electricity), mostly in developing
countries, it is unlikely that traditional sources of capital will be
sufficient. The limited levels of government investments and foreign aid imply
that increasing amounts of private sector capital and foreign direct investment
will be needed. This is an important driving force in many countries behind the
restructuring of utilities towards corporatisation in order to access financial
markets more efficiently.
ODA has declined or stagnated. The amount of available funding
for ODA is decreasing, even as a number of non-traditional country claimants are
emerging. In 1994, net total ODA financing amounted to US$67 billion compared
with US$74 billion in 1986 (based on 1993 constant dollars). Flows of private
capital to developing countries are increasing, from US$42 billion in 1990 to
US$170 billion in 1995. In 1995, foreign direct investment (FDI) in developing
countries reached US$100 billion. FDI is very unevenly distributed. The top 10
host developing countries attracted 76% of FDI in 1993-95, and China alone
received approximately 40%. In sharp contrast, all of Africa attracted only 5%.
it is unlikely that traditional sources of
capital will be sufficient to meet projected energy investment
requirements
Thus, the important new constraints are the declining
availability of traditional capital provided internally from governments and
externally from ODA and drastic reductions in government spending due to
cut-backs. Important new opportunities are offered by rapidly growing
private-sector activities.
These trends give rise to a set of considerations that must be
taken into account in formulating public policies to promote energy strategies
supportive of sustainable development. Such a set of considerations would
include:
· promoting access
to modern energy for all;
· a need for indigenous capacity
building;
· a focus on energy services
(rather than energy consumption);
· systematic introduction of a
mix of the next generation of cleaner fossil-fuel-using technologies, renewable
sources, and efficiency improvements;
· the establishment and
maintenance of a level playing field (elimination of permanent subsidies and
reflection of external (social and environmental) costs in energy pricing);
· the promotion and safeguarding
of competition;
· key roles for the private
sector;
· roles for stake-holders
(environmentalists, current and potential consumers, etc.) outside the private
sector; and
· utilisation of policy
instruments that are low-cost or no-cost to government treasuries.
High rates of innovation in the energy sector are needed to
bring about a sustainable energy future. Fortunately, many promising
technologies for reducing emissions, such as fuel cells and most renewable
energy technologies, require relatively modest investments in R&D and
commercial incentives. This is a reflection largely of the small scale and
modularity of these technologies and the fact that they are generally clean and
safe.
there are essential market and non-market
barriers to sustainable energy which must be identified and specific policies
designed to overcome them
A wide range of small-scale, modular technologies, including
most renewable energy technologies and fuel cells have favorable prospects for
cost reduction via learning by doing. This arises because for such
technologies energy costs are well-characterised by declining functions of the
cumulative volume of production. This technological characteristic implies that
the major aim of public policy should be to promote the rapid exploitation of
early market opportunities in order to hasten the broad competitiveness of these
new technologies.
In this context, it is to be noted that over the last decade,
public sector support for energy R&D in member states of the International
Energy Agency (IEA) has declined by one-third in absolute terms, and by one-half
as a percentage of GDP. Of this support for R&D, over 50% is allocated to
nuclear energy. On average, IEA member governments spend less than 10% of their
energy R&D expenditure on renewable energy technologies and less than 10% on
energy efficiency improvements. R&D expenditures are also falling in the
private sector. The declining trend in private sector investment in R&D
seems likely to continue in the present market place. Unless the decline in
R&D efforts is soon rectified, sustainable energy futures will be difficult
to realise.
Box 2. Examples of Measures to Create Early Markets for New
Technology
· the Indian
Renewable Energy Development Authority (IREDA) is a public bank that provides
soft loans to developers of renewable energy projects;
· the United States Public
Utilities Regulatory Policy Act (PURPA) obliges utilities to buy at fair prices
electricity generated by qualifying independent power producers and supplied to
the grid;
· the United Kingdoms
Non-fossil Fuel Obligation (NFFO) stipulates that producers have a minimum
supply capacity in non-fossil-fuel based generation;
· a proposed scheme being
examined in the United States under which electricity suppliers are required to
provide a minimum percentage of total sales from renewable sources either via
generation or via the purchase of renewable energy credits (RECs) from other
generators who can provide renewable energy supplies at lower cost;
and
· temporary subsidies to
lower consumer prices for new energy technologies. |
Box 3. Examples of Measures that Would Raise Funds for
Purposes Relevant to Sustainable Energy (e.g. Research and Development)
· California
legislation imposes a surcharge or System Benefits Charge (SBC) on all
electricity to raise funds for these purposes;
· taxes on externalities to support research on the
development, demonstration and commercialisation of new energy technologies (for
example a carbon tax of $1 US per tonne of carbon would raise, at the global
level of carbon dioxide emissions, revenues amounting to $6 billion per year.
While a tax of this magnitude would have a near negligible impact on consumer
energy prices - e.g., it would increase the retail energy price by about 0.35%
in the U.S. - the revenues would be adequate to support a near doubling of
global public-sector support for energy R&D expenditures, if these revenues
were devoted entirely to energy R&D). |
However well-crafted the generic energy strategies, they will
not succeed unless the barriers they face are identified and specific policies
designed to overcome them.
There is a sub-set of market barriers, including:
· Subsidies to
conventional energy (open and hidden): World-wide energy subsidies in the
mid-1990s amount to US$250-$300 billion per year, approximately 1% of world
gross domestic product, and more than half of the total annual investments in
the energy sector. Most of these subsidies are directed to reducing energy
prices paid by consumers and to enhancing the economic appeal of fossil fuels
and nuclear energy. In 1992, subsidies in developing countries amounted to
approximately US$50 billion, comparable to total ODA from all sources. These
subsidies constitute a barrier to new, sustainable energy options.
· Market prices that do not
reflect environmental damage: When market conditions do not fully take into
account external costs, the striking environmental advantages of the new and
cleaner energy options are not rewarded adequately in the marketplace. Such
environmental costs include air pollution affecting human health, land
degradation, acidification of soils and waters, and climate change. Against this
background, some countries have adopted energy taxes as well as taxes on certain
emissions (e.g., sulphur). Some governments also use emission standards that
must not be exceeded (e.g., for sulphur and nitrogen oxides and particulates) to
reflect some of the externalities not taken into account in market prices.
However, much remains to be done to adequately implement the polluter
pays principle agreed upon at the Rio Conference.
· Access to information:
Customers often have very limited information on the energy performance of
buildings and equipment, thereby effectively eliminating considerations of
energy efficiency in decision-making.
· First cost sensitivity:
Sustainable energy options are often initially expensive for the consumer. This
implies a barrier that can, however, be overcome if credit for borrowing capital
is available (and the life-cycle cost is lower than that of the alternatives).
· Split incentives: The
common landlord-tenant problem, whereby the landlord has no
incentive to invest in energy efficiency because it is the tenant who pays the
fuel bills.
· Indifference to energy
costs. Energy costs are often a small fraction of total costs, leading
to limited attention to alternative energy options.
Another sub-set of barriers consists of non-market barriers,
including:
· The
supply-biased paradigm: Producers and distributors of energy carriers tend
to be so focused on the supply of their products they tend to devote
little attention minimizing the cost of energy services that their products can
provide, and thus to improving efficiency. When increased sales of energy lead
to enhanced profits energy efficiency takes a back seat, even if it
would be beneficial to consumers or to society.
· Vested interests: These
interests, which exist both in the private and public sector, benefit from
business-as-usual approaches and practices and, therefore, resist change and
seek to belittle the opportunities which are emerging.
· Institutional
obstacles: These obstacles include the monopoly position of utilities and
the lack of appropriate fora for interaction between relevant stake-holders.
· Declining R&D
expenditures
There are encouraging examples of energy policies consistent
with major global trends that are designed to overcome market and non-market
barriers to the advancement of sustainable development objectives. The examples
in Boxes 2-5 represent a small selection of what can be considered.
environmental advantages of newer and cleaner
energy options are often not rewarded in the marketplace
Concerted efforts are needed at the international level between
multilateral institutions, private sector investors, government, civil society
and the energy industry to promote a sustainable energy path to ensure that
energy becomes an instrument for sustainable human development.
Internationally, no one organisation is responsible for energy.
Within the UN System there are numerous agencies that support diverse activities
in both conventional and renewable energy. The World Energy Council,
representing world energy industries, has called on various occasions for new
partnerships between government, the private sector and consumers to facilitate
the changes required to move the world to a path of sustainable development.
Many other NGOs, primarily motivated by environmental and social concerns, have
advanced similar propositions.
Box 4. Examples of Measures to Advance More Efficient Use of
Energy
· utility demand
side management programs (e.g., the Illuminex program in Mexico, where the
utility sells compact fluorescent light bulbs providing consumer credits as
needed). Utilities in many other countries have similar programmes;
· transformation of the market
through government-stimulated procurement of efficient end-use devices (e.g.,
the Swedish Energy Agency NUTEKs scheme to bring into the market more
energy-efficient technologies);
· the encouragement of energy
service companies (ESCOs) that invest in energy efficiency and deliver energy
services (rather than energy per se) to their customers;
· Ghanas Ministry of
Energy has contracted ESCOs to identify energy-efficiency opportunities in the
industrial sector, so that the industries involved would then implement with
their own financial resources or with support from a government-established
revolving fund;
· the
Building Measurement and Verification Protocol to measure and evaluate energy
efficiency improvements, especially in buildings. |
Box 5. Examples of Innovative Institutional Ideas
· a proposal to
stimulate large scale development of renewable energy resources by using
renewable energy resource development concessions similar to the non-renewable
energy resource development that has proved to be so successful historically in
developing oil and natural gas resources;
· providing consumer credits for sustainable energy
solutions in developing countries. |
a public sector-led reorientation to promote and
adopt sustainable energy is essential to meet the commitments of the global
conferences
The ability to move towards a sustainable energy future depends
on building coalitions around common development, economic, technological and
energy service interests that are part of a sustainable approach to energy. No
new international institutions need be established. Rather, a framework through
which sustainable energy strategies are promoted and interested parties
convened, could be developed to address common interests. A mechanism that
encourages better dialogue between governments, the private sector and NGOs on
the mobilisation of investment funds, technology transfer, management and
training is needed.
In contrast to the past, most investments in the future in
energy systems are likely to be in developing countries. It is of considerable
financial and environmental interest to developing countries that new
technological opportunities become available to them. If they were to have these
opportunities, they would be able to leapfrog to the new generation of cleaner
energy technologies, without going through the same unsustainable path that the
industrialised countries have followed.
This sets the stage for development cooperation. It can
contribute to implementing sustainable energy futures and thereby work toward
poverty reduction, job creation, the advancement of women and protection of the
environment. Key elements in this regard will be human capacity building, the
formulation of legal and institutional frameworks supportive of these
developments, the demonstration of key new technologies, and national action
programmes for sustainable energy.
The international community has dealt with numerous aspects of
social, economic and sustainable development through the UN global conferences
of the 1990s. They have identified targets and goals and concluded international
agreements, platforms of action, declarations and resolutions adopting these
commitments. Energy issues must be squarely dealt with if these commitments are
to be fulfilled, and the leadership must come from governments. Within an
appropriate framework, the private sector, energy companies, investors and civil
society can all contribute and support each other to meet the goals of
sustainable development. A public sector-led reorientation to promote and adopt
sustainable energy is essential to meet the commitments of the global
conferences.
Energy can become an instrument for sustainable development. The
point is, while the future may be difficult, a continuation of present trends
cannot be
sustained.